Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 10:46:33 -0400 From: Alejandro Imass <ait@p2ee.org> To: Xn Nooby <xnooby@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Over-whelmed by ports and package tools Message-ID: <BANLkTikkqgpBWQq0Fs_Ce9tW1Zrn=JD4DA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin=XGQvns15LupDXyRADSkkd8OgsQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <BANLkTi=tVL3BR%2BVrp6MBWc4t%2BNOsQCGzrw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimAx3BJ63aRCkAZQsrWvUrg5HfBGg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimCZ4PZ0MmgxsqRS-0bYzPAg1CnDQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin=XGQvns15LupDXyRADSkkd8OgsQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Xn Nooby <xnooby@gmail.com> wrote: >> Also try to go with portsnap for ports IMHO it's the path of least >> resistance ;-) > > I will try portsnap, and read about the pkgdb database. =A0If all these > tools ultimately resolve to pkgdb, I will try to learn about that. > > I have tried PC-BSD, and look forward to version 9.0. =A0I really don't > like KDE, though. =A0I hear some rumblings about a Gnome developer Jajajaja. THAT IS EXACTLY why I don't use PC-BSD ! > wanting to drop BSD support, so maybe I better start liking KDE. > PC-BSD seems to have done a great job reproducing the way Mac's > install software, by using self-contained bundles (PBI's). And next > version of PBI is supposed to not need a GUI. I'm sure I will be > trying the next version PC-BSD. Hopefully to be released soon. > > thanks! >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikkqgpBWQq0Fs_Ce9tW1Zrn=JD4DA>