From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 26 11:28:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA08069 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 26 May 1996 11:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA08047 for ; Sun, 26 May 1996 11:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0uNkXm-0003w6C; Sun, 26 May 96 11:27 PDT Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA03587; Sun, 26 May 1996 18:27:58 GMT To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: unix + asm In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 May 1996 19:31:24 +0200." <199605261731.TAA02680@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 18:27:58 +0000 Message-ID: <3585.833135278@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Depends on your point of view, of course. For the Zilog `ld' > mnemonic, ``ld dst, src'' sounds more reasonable to me (``load the dst > with src.''). For the Intel `mov' mnemonic, the other way round seems > better suited (``move src into dst.''). Principle of least asstonishment strikes again! I agree! -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.