Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 13:27:12 -0400 From: Zvezdan Petkovic <zvezdan@CS.WM.EDU> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SSH Problem Message-ID: <20011003132712.A27029@dali.cs.wm.edu> In-Reply-To: <001601c14c0d$c2ee2f80$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com>; from kutulu@kutulu.org on Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:17:30AM -0400 References: <OF40891511.811B6EE4-ON88256AD9.0038BC32@wr.usgs.gov> <7140000.1002030825@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net> <20011002205800.A24931@dali.cs.wm.edu> <001601c14c0d$c2ee2f80$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:17:30AM -0400, Kutulu wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Zvezdan Petkovic" <zvezdan@CS.WM.EDU> > To: <stable@FreeBSD.ORG> > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:58 PM > Subject: Re: SSH Problem > > > > I do not understand why FreeBSD still distributes OpenSSH 2.3.x as > > default and OpenSSH 2.9 as a port. As you can see it is already at 2.9.9 > > version. If you still use Protocol 1 you should be aware that your > > I asked this exact same question, on this list I beleive, about 2 weeks ago. > The answer at the time was that 2.9 was still being tested in -CURRENT. A > few days later it was merged back into -STABLE. I rebuilt my kernel/world > last night and now have OpenSSH 2.9, working like a champ. That's fast > service ;) > I tend to agree because I only mentioned last night the new 2.9.9 release and the maintainer of the port already replied that update is on the way as you can see from the thread. Thanks Dirk. Cheers, -- Zvezdan Petkovic <zvezdan@cs.wm.edu> http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011003132712.A27029>