Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 15:54:48 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is Thot (WYSIWIG editor) for you? Message-ID: <199705132254.PAA29845@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 May 1997 13:01:44 PDT." <3378C8A8.2A54@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Before even on deciding on a separate CDrom distribution , it is more appropriate to decide whether thot is useful or not. On the surface it looks really good , I just have to use thot more extensively over here to determine is goodness. Cheers, Amancio >From The Desk Of "Pedro F. Giffuni" : > Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > > "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> pointed me out to: > > http://opera.inrialpes.fr/thot/ > > .... > > > > If thot should prove to be useful and stable we can adopt it . > > Hey, if the code bloat bothers you it is well worth it to have a > > separate CDROM with tot and amaya, a web editor / browser. > > We can also include other OO packages such as ACE, ILU and a couple of > > CORBA ORBs 8) > > > It's not that much, besides thot's libraries are shared by Amaya. WC may > also be happy, some people prefer Linux because "it comes with more CDs" > :-). > > Pedro. > > > > Enjoy, > > Amancio > > > > > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705132254.PAA29845>