Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:22:42 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de>
To:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, simon@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: [simon@FreeBSD.org: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssl/ssl d1_both.c ?dtls1.h ssl.h ssl_err.c]
Message-ID:  <200710231622.l9NGMghL042088@lurza.secnetix.de>
In-Reply-To: <20071018223724.GA987@zaphod.nitro.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
 > RELENG_7 isn't -STABLE yet

Uhm, are you sure?  In the past, whenever a new RELENG
branch was created, it was implicitly the next -stable
branch, because -current moved on to the next version
number.  Did that policy change?

If it did change, I'm curious to know what the version
7 branch is called right now (6 being -stable and 8
being -current)?  I assume we do not have two -current
branches at the same time, do we?

Best regards
   Oliver

PS:  I do agree that the DTLS security fix doesn't need
a FreeBSD Security Advisory, for the reason that it
doesn't seem to affect any _released_ FreeBSD version.

-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606,  Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758,  Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart

FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr:  http://www.secnetix.de/bsd

"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.  However, this
is not necessarily a good idea.  It is hard to be sure where
they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting
under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200710231622.l9NGMghL042088>