Date: 14 Apr 99 12:34:11 NZST From: David Ferry <lamester@netscape.net> To: Paolo Di Francesco <paipai@tin.it> Cc: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Re: Finally a kernel discussion, yay!] Message-ID: <19990414003411.16721.qmail@ww184.netaddress.usa.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Paolo Di Francesco" <paipai@tin.it> wrote: > > = > > > = > > > Oh, well... Let's discuss about kernel. 8) > > > = > > > Actually I don't know which is the best version to start experiment= s = > > > with... = > > > = > > > The 3.1 version could be a good candidate, but I have seen a 4.0 ve= rsion > > > in the -current tree... > > > = > > = > > I'm not fussed. In fact I don't care. By the time we have this going = it won't > > matter. > > = > = > Ok. I'll buy the 3.1 CDRom, so I can start ... ;) > = Cool. About the compiler....egcs must work, it is used in linux/ultrasparc. The problem with second pahse building with gcc is that we require a /usr/include that is specific for the 64bit ultra. This defines stuff like the size of pointers (1 register) ie. 1 word size= ie 64 bits. This is where the compiler is breaking, so if anyone out there has a /usr/include (specifically stdio.h) for a 64bit machine, we can probably complete building of a cross compiler. lamester@netscape.net ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webm= ail.netscape.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990414003411.16721.qmail>