Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:57:59 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Lo=EFc_BLOT?= <loic.blot@unix-experience.fr> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: High Kernel Load with nfsv4 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412201355250.6852@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <1419070695.4549.6.camel@unix-experience.fr> References: <766911003.8048587.1418095910736.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <1e19554bc0d4eb3e8dab74e2056b5ec4@mail.unix-experience.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412192005130.6852@woozle.rinet.ru> <1419070695.4549.6.camel@unix-experience.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Lo?c BLOT wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > you mean less process improve performance ? I suppose yes, especially if you have small number of concurrently-accessing yout NFS server clients and/or client processes. Default of 4, of course, is ridiculously low nowadays; however, I'll start with, say, 4 per CPU core you have, as someone mentioned previously. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1412201355250.6852>