From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 17:34:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DAB16A4CE; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:34:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3743643D31; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:34:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6B4566C78; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:34:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:34:26 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sergey Matveychuk Message-ID: <20040121013426.GB22773@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1074590694.85583.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <400D2939.5090203@fillmore-labs.com> <1074617147.757.16.camel@gyros> <400D6379.5010602@ciam.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <400D6379.5010602@ciam.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Eivind Eklund cc: Oliver Eikemeier cc: Joe Marcus Clarke cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 01:34:28 -0000 --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:20:57PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > >>>Type: FEATURE > >>> > >>>Title: Add per-port persistent build options with a menu-driven > >>>front-end > [snipped] > >>>PR: > >>> > >>>Submitted by: eivind > [snipped] > >What's the general consensus on this (is there one)? What about ports >=20 > Sadly, we've seen no PR before and couldn't discuss it. It's been discussed off and on for several years. There were a couple of prototypes developed, all of which had various problems, including a prototype I wrote. Eivind did some more work on my code (and his initial version also had problems, as I recall), but I assume they were all cleaned up in the version that was committed. Kris --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFADdciWry0BWjoQKURAuVTAKD+t3pV5u++dyTn77BfkpKsd3tw1QCgqXyp +iY89ELxAULA4MCzaGIuQ44= =ltGm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6--