Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:41:31 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: BSD <bsd@shell-server.com> Cc: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) Message-ID: <20001001154131.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10010011401380.70294-100000@marvin.shell-server.com>; from bsd@shell-server.com on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 02:06:45PM -0500 References: <4.3.2.20001001132645.00cae340@207.227.119.2> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10010011401380.70294-100000@marvin.shell-server.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 02:06:45PM -0500, BSD wrote:
> > >cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm)
> > >options NO_F00F_HACK
> >
> > The F00F problem is only with Pentiums.
>
> Exactly why I disable the work-around code with NO_F00F_HACK
> option :)
That's like saying "I turn down the scsi probe time" without having any
scsi devices in your kernel. Every time NO_F00F_HACK is used is in conjunction
with I586_CPU.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001001154131.Y38472>