Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:12:53 +0000
From:      Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS}
Message-ID:  <CADLo838b0yny29Cg2aVUuiOt3U8PymtKP4T37-BRRavQqCrhFg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP74ECED3402212DEE835D2B93D70@phx.gbl>
References:  <BLU0-SMTP1842D2E337FA1B4F69DE46093D70@phx.gbl> <515079EE.4010001@FreeBSD.org> <BLU0-SMTP74ECED3402212DEE835D2B93D70@phx.gbl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Mar 2013 17:36, "Carmel" <carmel_ny@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:23:10 +0100
> Alex Dupre articulated:
>
> > Carmel ha scritto:
> > > I have a problem with updating a Makefile for an existing port. When
> > > running "portlint -a" on the Makefile, it pops up with this warning:
> > >
> > > WARN: Makefile: [53]: NOPORTDOCS found.  Consider using
> > > PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS
> > >
> > > So, I have tried doing what the Porters Handbook suggested, and it
> > > just bombs out with this useless message:
> >
> > You should add:
> >
> > .include <bsd.port.options.mk>
> >
> > before checking for ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS}
>
> Thanks, I don't recall seeing that even mentioned, although it
> probably was. It took awhile but I did finally figure out where to
> place it in the file.

Hm, it's not mentioned.

If the text "below the inclusion of bsd.port.options.mk" were included,
would that be helpful?

Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838b0yny29Cg2aVUuiOt3U8PymtKP4T37-BRRavQqCrhFg>