From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jul 21 15:19:14 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DE25437B401; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from renown.cnchost.com (renown.concentric.net [207.155.248.7])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4874143E31; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com)
Received: from bitblocks.com (adsl-209-204-185-216.sonic.net [209.204.185.216])
	by renown.cnchost.com
	id SAA16450; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 18:19:06 -0400 (EDT)
	[ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14]
Message-ID: <200207212219.SAA16450@renown.cnchost.com>
To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>
Subject: Re: MFC status for retransmit timer min/slop 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:55:26 PDT."
             <200207212155.g6LLtQdq033664@apollo.backplane.com> 
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:19:04 -0700
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>     Wow.  I'm flattered.  Everyone so far thinks 200ms will be ok!

I'd still prefer the default left at 1 sec until there is
enough real testing so that people not taking part in the
test don't get surprised.  That is, "dampen" any potential
future oscillations in this value.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message