From owner-freebsd-qa Sat Jul 13 15:20:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867A137B400; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thuvia.demon.co.uk (thuvia.demon.co.uk [193.237.34.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F66B43E31; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:20:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk) Received: from dotar.thuvia.org (dotar.thuvia.org [10.0.0.4]) by phaidor.thuvia.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6DMK6b41425; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:20:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk) Received: from dotar.thuvia.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dotar.thuvia.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6DMK6KC050407; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:20:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@dotar.thuvia.org) Received: (from mark@localhost) by dotar.thuvia.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6DMK6uM050406; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:20:06 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:20:06 +0100 (BST) From: Mark Valentine Message-Id: <200207132220.g6DMK6uM050406@dotar.thuvia.org> In-Reply-To: Cyrille Lefevre's message of Jul 13, 3:49am X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(5) 10/07/98) To: Cyrille Lefevre Subject: Re: docproj package and 4.6 CD-ROM Cc: qa@FreeBSD.ORG, nik@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > From: Cyrille Lefevre > Date: Sat 13 Jul, 2002 > Subject: Re: docproj package and 4.6 CD-ROM > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:29:53PM +0100, Mark Valentine wrote: > > Any idea why the docproj binary package didn't make it onto CD-ROM #3 for > > the 4.6 release (it's listed in src/release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh)? > > > > Is it because it's interactive unless JADETEX is defined? > > how about to have a subport such as docproj-jadetex which just > define JADETEX and to make docproj non-interactive in all cases ? I suggested docproj and docproj-nojadetex on the doc mailing list back in March. I don't particularly care which way around it is, but my preference would be to have jadetex by default. Is this what's needed to fix the missing package? Nik, is this a problem for the FreeBSD Services release too? Is fixing this within the scope of the 4.6.1 release? It's painful installing the docproj packages without it (I build the package with jadetex locally here and stash it on my install server for things to work - it would be nice just to use the DVD instead of my install server.) Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munch* and endorses FreeBSD -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message