From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 5 15:02:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADFE16A4D0 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 15:02:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B48043D1D for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 15:02:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i25N2EUA037745; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 01:02:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost)i25N2ELL037742; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 01:02:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 01:02:14 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi To: Chris Pressey In-Reply-To: <20040305145853.3a365f60.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20040306005744.T38020@haldjas.folklore.ee> References: <2EAEEFC4-6EEE-11D8-AE09-000A95DA58FE@jimz.net> <20040305145853.3a365f60.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on haldjas.folklore.ee cc: dgw@liwest.at cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org cc: jim@jimz.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD Most wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 23:02:59 -0000 On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Chris Pressey wrote: > On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:17:40 -0500 > Jim Zajkowski wrote: > > > On Mar 5, 2004, at 6:02 PM, Daniela wrote: > > > > > But I'm so into low-level programming, that it's (sometimes) easier > > > for me to code in ASM than in C. > > > > Like I said, may you have a long and successful career in writing > > device drivers and firmware. > > Or compilers. > The majority of speed in compilers does not come from assembler tricks. Especially in compilers, code correctness is much more important than speed (is there anybody still who is not sick of gcc causing problems?) followed by high level analysis and optimisation. Pick up a compiler book - any compiler book - and you will see relatively little about ASM. > -Chris >