From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 7 18:48:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC351065672 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:48:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nzp@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [204.13.164.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31158FC13 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fulvetta.riseup.net (fulvetta-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 129AE5F1AE for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 10:48:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: nzp@fulvetta.riseup.net) with ESMTPSA id 321C623D Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:48:01 +0100 From: Nikola =?utf-8?B?UGF2bG92acSH?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120207184801.GA31289@sputnjik.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3411412722-917504491@intranet.com.mx> <4F30849D.2020408@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <868vkfxqk1.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120207040649.GA28910@hemlock.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120207040649.GA28910@hemlock.hydra> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Software Development using Freebsd. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:48:07 -0000 On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 09:06:49PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 07:36:46PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > > > However, from personal experience, I know that Larry Wall understands > > Object Oriented Programming, and Guido definitely doesn't get it. > > Obviously, other people have worked on both languages, but keep that in > > mind. I can present my evidence of how Guido doesn't get it in a longer > > post, if prompted. > > I'm definitely curious. If you don't think this is the place for it, I'd > love to see your explanation in private email or by other means. > Me too. -- People will do tomorrow what they did today because that is what they did yesterday.