From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 24 19:52:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37CB10656C8; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccna.syl@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f134.google.com (mail-qy0-f134.google.com [209.85.221.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873E88FC16; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccna.syl@gmail.com) Received: by qyk40 with SMTP id 40so3930282qyk.3 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:52:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CQc6JpVMcmdYEPLGixYl5NoXgaTDuvlMOGLUG1c864Y=; b=uu7SjhXeeLrZWTObexxV4ap/TA3yDaSbz/SE27c8cA7vnNrRpcqx5HqYZ+v2QuQs4J wsLs2hrrrODj9HxcOEQpFJOAf8YgvmSEzneicZ8BGpOd4Kj7y1a98M4kzvntIKrLPnRW yfSBkJR1o/EXQeDWQirSZM3sU5YSLOcfBj1nc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ATzwhFpgamIbkVe3lPCdm/OJgQISlb2ln22yQqf8r4RZaf9igrBrH/xHMKaZWcjkiR ae5zMepqi1rNINlomEEQBtwfTDdwhn86U4VIFBpI4PCTd1izJtiCEtfJBSHkh5x/HV28 7cX8BgANMIMSmxFL3whPWpcjE+LJx/AScDO4s= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090324.084233.1626286031.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <8BC7AFF2-E0E1-4498-82E8-29C3F64C5E2E@FreeBSD.org> <164b4c9c0903240210v4d05770du1f02de26f42f6454@mail.gmail.com> <00675D70-A3F9-412F-BDB9-F9CF8C91D75A@freebsd.org> <20090324.084233.1626286031.imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:52:06 +0100 Received: by 10.231.15.130 with SMTP id k2mr2561129iba.3.1237924341658; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <164b4c9c0903241252y3f0f8958y88be873ae6c9664a@mail.gmail.com> From: Sylvestre Gallon To: "M. Warner Losh" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: antab@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, cognet@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Atmel at91sam9261-ek support. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:52:23 -0000 On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:42 PM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <00675D70-A3F9-412F-BDB9-F9CF8C91D75A@freebsd.org> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Arnar Mar Sig writes: > > All of this hand wringing is because we've boguslly collapsed the core > support, the SoC support and the board support into one file. =A0We have > to move away from that model and properly layer things to move > forward. =A0The means by which we load this or that thing isn't going to > matter so much until we adopt this better structure. > > Warner > Do you think that I can try to update the diff to separate the SoC code, the board code and the at91 generic code and re-submit it before the end of the week? Also I'm currently looking for google summer of code possible proposals and have access to a big range of different Atmel boards. Do you think that the improvement of the at91 architecture, and the adding of support for another SoC could be a potential subject ? And if so, is someone ready to be my mentor for this project ? Cheers --=20 Sylvestre Gallon (http://devsyl.blogspot.com) Fifth Grade Student @ Epitech & Researcher @ LSE R&D @ Rathaxes (http://www.rathaxes.org)