Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 May 2006 23:12:42 -0500
From:      linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
To:        Panagiotis Astithas <past@ebs.gr>
Cc:        fbsd@a1poweruser.com, ports@freebsd.org, "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Has the port collection become to large to handle.
Message-ID:  <20060515041242.GA30666@soaustin.net>
In-Reply-To: <44670ED7.7050602@ebs.gr>
References:  <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGIEPBHGAA.fbsd@a1poweruser.com> <44670ED7.7050602@ebs.gr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:04:55PM +0300, Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
> I believe that one solution to the scalability problem of creating and 
> maintaining updated packages, would be to decentralize it more. Each 
> time I submit an update for one of the ports I maintain, I've already 
> build the relevant packages, as a QA measure. There should be no need to 
> wait for the ports cluster to build the official version, instead of 
> using my own, modulo perhaps the higher quality assurance you'd get from 
> Kris's build infrastructure.

You have built the package for one build environment (buildenv).  There
are 12.  See http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portsoverall.py.

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060515041242.GA30666>