Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Jan 1998 08:47:30 -0600 (CST)
From:      Jim Bryant <jbryant@unix.tfs.net>
To:        jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Time to retire fetch?
Message-ID:  <199801051447.IAA11455@unix.tfs.net>
In-Reply-To: <4721.883994636@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Jan 5, 98 02:03:56 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply:
> I just noticed that FTP in -current now supports http:// style
> fetches, a feature which seems to have crept in under my nose during
> the sync with NetBSD's ftp client.  Given that, the questions now in
> my mind are:
> 
> 	1. Do we want to retire fetch and just use ftp now as our
> 	   FETCH_CMD in -current?  Would any fetch features be missed
> 	   that would also be overtly difficult to merge into the ftp
> 	   client?  Strengthening one tool rather than putting two
> 	   into competition is obviously a worthy goal if it's possible
> 	   to do it.
> 
> 	2. Do we simply want to ignore this new feature of ftp, perhaps
> 	   under the premise that having an ftp client fetch http URLs
> 	   is rather counter-intuitive if one is a stickler for naming
> 	   conventions, and just go on like we are now?
> 
> 	3. Given that ftp probably doesn't deal well with the file:/
> 	   URLs that can also be passed to fetch(1) from the ports
> 	   collection, does fetch(1) perhaps want to stick around but
> 	   simply become a smaller pre-parsing script which hands its
> 	   work off to other tools rather than doing it itself?
> 
> I've no clear preference right now, I'm just musing out loud.
> Comments?

i find fetch to be more reliable than either ncftp or ftp when it
comes to retreiving files from wcarchive in recent weeks.  also fetch
has the ability to resume a terminated transfer.  to give one example,
i transferred the last snapshot first with ncftp, then ftp, and then
fetch from a hand-built script [pain in the butt].  the only thing
that worked, even after approximately 37 script restarts, was the
fetch script.

my vote is to keep fetch.

jim
-- 
All opinions expressed are mine, if you    |  "I will not be pushed, stamped,
think otherwise, then go jump into turbid  |  briefed, debriefed, indexed, or
radioactive waters and yell WAHOO !!!      |  numbered!" - #1, "The Prisoner"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inet: jbryant@tfs.net    AX.25: kc5vdj@wv0t.#neks.ks.usa.noam     grid: EM28pw
voice: KC5VDJ - 6 & 2 Meters AM/FM/SSB, 70cm FM.   http://www.tfs.net/~jbryant
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HF/6M/2M: IC-706-MkII, 2M: HTX-212, 2M: HTX-202, 70cm: HTX-404, Packet: KPC-3+



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801051447.IAA11455>