From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 21 21:11:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4F71FD for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-x229.google.com (mail-ea0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28EF628F1 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f169.google.com with SMTP id k11so951491eaj.0 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 14:11:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=YBnKoZtlApKtv3pLHDFs3XY1Vtp092dszVwOX4xTi1w=; b=TUJsxCCvuK5lHVJRFO0IA3XHgnw5NgUcXqRKTCt2N99G3xt1A25t+3zDqkbUvc1Ik1 0OlaK2ZLk78OwgRgymeHQwHtvF6hSBK/u1mkVVjSpHeik42y6qHxJi3stG0VW1BJATik 50i5XBxdy192Mg8vaVfMDLGzYuFmC1ve5P3fYVtMYJi8jX8oFeggck4Ymn9t+rr3eyYO RFE1esGaJJtdDpct5b2S7BCm+eIa+zkDCX0n67rN+jAlhvTr0nyCbL3VY6pKBfJAIrpJ puoJpC4ClugOlI4Vsu35LljtAxnNx5ac3EUgMXANMeHbU5a3VpHuK84SvEc97+iKEEJ2 aaFg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.14.225.199 with SMTP id z47mr22462149eep.24.1379797876553; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 14:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.22.65 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 14:11:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:11:16 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Wildly different numbers of portsnap updates between i386 and amd64? From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:11:18 -0000 The update is a delta from what is already on your system. When you updated the older box, you pulled in lots of changes to get it current. The newer box needed fewer updates to get current. Or something is wrong. You can always delete the contents of /ports and the database in /var/db/portsnap. Then just portsnap fetch && portsnap extract. You will get a fresh ports tree. On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Christian Campbell wrote: > Hi. I run 9.1-RELEASE on two boxes: one i386 and the other amd64. I've run > the latter for a bit over a week. When I portsnap update, the 32-bit > machine typically gets several to dozens or hundreds of updates, while the > 64-bit machine typically gets none, or maybe a couple. What might be the > explanation for this behaviour? > > Thank you, > Christian > > _____________________________________________________ > 3425 SW 2nd Ave, #239 cell (352) 514-7411 > Gainesville, FL 32607-2813 > dcamp@alumni.ufl.edu > > On this perfect day / Nothing's standing in my way... -Hoku > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"