From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 5 22:02:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7F315DA; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7479F1FB0; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p5DCBC774.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.203.199.116]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s15M2Cht071679; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:02:13 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s15M2XnI091500; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 23:02:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s15M2Lha059200; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 23:02:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201402052202.s15M2Lha059200@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Time to bid farewell to the old pkg_ tools From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:38:45 GMT." <52F01A75.7050409@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 23:02:21 +0100 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:02:45 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 03/02/2014 21:24, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >> be beneficial in a very short amount of time. Even if you prefer to > >> compile from source, > >=20 > > I use source, rarely if ever use packages, (except pkg_delete > > to remove old broken dependencies). No opinion which scrips are better.= > > >=20 > >=20 > >> you will still reap the benefits of the modern > >> packaging system. > >=20 > > In 10.0 FreeBSD `reaped the benefit` of a default new horrible > > registry that smells like Microsoft with quasi binary local.sqlite > > needing special tools. (Yes I know there's an export function.) > >=20 > > For 2 decade we've poured scorn on Microsoft & its opaque easily > > damaged hard to access registry, & lauded how with FreeBSD we can > > examine & manipulate & repair our text based equivalent with any > > number of personal choice text tools, & now FreeSBD is burdened by > > this horrible Microsoft style registry. > > You're being absurd. Immediately personal criticism is a poor way to start convincing. ports/ is not just for package addicts. I never install packages, but only build & install from ports/. sqlite junk obstructs /var/db/pkg being accessed by find & grep to debug breaking ports builds. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Interleave replies below like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative.