From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 11 18:20:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76476299 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:20:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300A38FC17 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9BIK2lb051720; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:20:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q9BIK2PO051717; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:20:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:20:02 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Robert Fitzpatrick Subject: Re: gmirror degraded In-Reply-To: <5076DAA6.9070203@webtent.org> Message-ID: References: <5076DAA6.9070203@webtent.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:20:02 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:20:05 -0000 On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > Just looking for some advice, I had a server lock up that uses gmirror > for two RAID-1 arrays of the primary drive and a data drive. The data > drive was reported as degraded after a reset of the server, but is > rebuilding. It is comprised of two TB drives with one reporting ACTIVE > with no flags. The other synchronizing and taking days... You mean it does this repeatedly? > I ran the smartctl command below on the synchronizing drive and it seems > there are no errors? Should I trust this drive? 1,003 reallocated sectors is a bad sign. I would replace that drive.