From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 5 12:44:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA01005 for current-outgoing; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 12:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA00989 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 12:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA06593; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 12:42:11 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199708051942.MAA06593@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Make this a relese coordinator decision (was Re: ports-current/packages-current discontinued) To: mal@kairos.algonet.se (Mats Lofkvist) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 12:42:11 -0700 (MST) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199708051823.UAA15206@kairos.> from "Mats Lofkvist" at Aug 5, 97 08:23:44 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I can't remember trying cross-compiling though, when we got the 32's > the older ones were replaced. But since the NCR 32 was a 68020 machine > and the XP used a 68010 (*) (if I remember correctly), maybe the same tools > were used only with some flags to generate -010 code together with an > extra set of libraries? That would make it a bit to easy to qualify as > a cross environment imho. It was the same front end, but there was a cc and a cc16 that were invoked, as well as na ld and na ld16. That you thought there was one code generator shows how well the cross environment was integrated. 8-). Actually, I never used it, but you could also build for one of their cash register controllers, as well. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.