From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 15 02:48:16 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA12717 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 02:48:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA12710 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 02:48:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA06829; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:44:57 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol To: "Amancio Hasty Jr." cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch), freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: growing X server processes In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Dec 1995 02:03:58 PST." <199512151003.CAA00725@rah.star-gate.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 11:44:56 +0100 Message-ID: <6827.819024296@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Dumb question, > > If XFree86 is moving to their on efficient malloc shouldn't we be doing the > same ? 8) > 1. Not if it is tuned to X11 in particular. 2. Not if it isn't better than what we have. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.