Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:53:01 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: pgollucci@FreeBSD.org, apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: AP_FAST_BUILD problems Message-ID: <1277412781.8151.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <4C23AFE6.9080604@p6m7g8.com> References: <4C235CE4.3060800@FreeBSD.org> <4C23AFE6.9080604@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-c4ZiOGUXEdTj5PrvuRBD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Philip M. Gollucci p=ED=B9e v =E8t 24. 06. 2010 v 19:20 +0000:
> > your recent sweep to convert mod_* ports to AP_FAST_BUILD can lead to
> > hard to detect runtime problems, when the module consists from more tha=
n
> > one .c file. We just hit tis on mod_layout22 here at my job.
> >=20
> > You might want to do a pass over all ports you changed, and revert when
> > needed.
> >=20
> I don't disagree, but you'll have to give me more info for why. The
> whole point of apxs is that it can handle or or more .c files. The
> specific error you see in layout22 would be of much use.
The specific issue with layout22 was that ports framework only compiled
one .c file with apxs (mod_layout.c) which then failed on apache startup
due to missing symbols which would normally come from utility.c
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Alignment: Neutral Greedy
--=-c4ZiOGUXEdTj5PrvuRBD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAkwjxakACgkQntdYP8FOsoKb6wCfeV0nuojNNb0L7xQ3zA5cDy8Z
puIAn1GVSlYNtxt2X4WgRY7F/+MwcdcN
=AR6x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-c4ZiOGUXEdTj5PrvuRBD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1277412781.8151.0.camel>