Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:58:06 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, des@FreeBSD.org, tobez@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper Message-ID: <20021113075806.GM1278@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <3DD1EE5E.E268055A@FreeBSD.org> References: <20021107014750.GA18398@rot13.obsecurity.org> <200211080858.gA88wiCE029745@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20021112101236.GB8744@dragon.nuxi.com> <3DD1EE5E.E268055A@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2002/11/12 22:17), Doug Barton wrote: > In case another vote is needed, I've always been opposed to the wrapper. > tobez and I put some work into getting the use.perl script in the port > to DTRT shortly after the demise of base perl, and I'm still willing to > help fine tune it if needed. I hate to drag this out further, but nobody else seems to have mentioned something I think is important. Where are we with making lang/perl5's package default selected in sysinstall? While I've been opposed to the inclusion of the wrapper since before it was imported, I think its removal would be well accompanied by the sysinstall change. If there's already a precedent in sysinstall, I'll happily go cut-n-paste a solution myself. Just tell me what the precedent is. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021113075806.GM1278>