From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 03:41:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD9A16A4CE; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 03:41:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com (mailout04.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD96F43D41; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 03:41:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd03.aul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AdpaX-0004vO-00; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 12:41:33 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (Sa1veMZe8ejivXPavx9OHdRY7UHiPthDhd890T28tuX-xpENOaQZsW@[80.131.126.23]) by fmrl03.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1Adpa8-0QilfM0; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:41:08 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i06Bf3Jb012911; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:41:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i06BfCTL017255; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:41:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:41:12 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" Message-Id: <20040106124112.18ad385f@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040106015433.GU7617@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <200401051651.i05Gp6w14785@catwoman.cs.moravian.edu> <20040106015433.GU7617@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: Sa1veMZe8ejivXPavx9OHdRY7UHiPthDhd890T28tuX-xpENOaQZsW@t-dialin.net cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is vinum in current working for anyone X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 11:41:37 -0000 On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:24:33 +1030 "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" wrote: > On Monday, 5 January 2004 at 11:51:06 -0500, Stephen Corbesero wrote: > > > > I have been unable to use vinum in current since about 5.1. I have > > just sent debugging information to Greg Lehey, but I was wondering > > if it is working for anyone and how our configurations differ. > > > > If rc.conf specifies vinum_start="YES", my system usually crashes as > > soon as vinum loads and starts scanning disks. Sometimes it doesn't > > crash, but the vinum config is lost on at least one of the vinum > > drives. > > Yes, I have your backtrace, and I've been trying to make sense of it. > In the meantime I've had another one; together they give me the > feeling that something has gone funny just recently. I don't > understand from the backtrace how anything should have got trashed on > disk, though; I suspect that the data really was still there, and a > (the) bug gave the impression that it wasn't. FYI: I've a SATA system, which tells me the volume, plexe and subdisks are crashed on every boot. When I just do a "setstate up" I can fsck and use the volume just fine. It runs with an icc comiled kernel ATM, but I see the same behavior with a gcc compiled kernel. I also get spurious interrupts at a shutdown and I think this is the reason of this failure after booting the system... Am I right or should I try to dig into this? Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7