Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 08:50:30 -0400 From: Chip Morton <2m5mefx02@sneakemail.com> To: FreeBSD Chat <chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:09.signal Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20030813084614.0195ff40@threespace.com> In-Reply-To: <3F39DB0B.626A0457@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030811133518.66226B-100000@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030811133518.66226B-100000@fledge.watson.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20030812103946.01a5f008@threespace.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 02:30 AM 8/13/2003, Terry Lambert wrote: >So... how much SPAM will need to be sent from behind your NAT, >making it look like it's you who's SPAM'ming, before you close >the thing down? It would take enough spam to get a complaint sent to my ISP (whoever that is) which makes them take action against me. Until then, I'll take my chances. But honestly, I can't imagine that anybody serious about sending spam is waiting for somebody in this area to set up an open wireless network to wreak havoc. It just seems like a low probability event.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20030813084614.0195ff40>