From owner-freebsd-multimedia Mon Mar 24 16:12:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA22540 for multimedia-outgoing; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 16:12:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from xcf.berkeley.edu (scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.43.201]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA22527 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 16:12:50 -0800 (PST) From: grady@scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU Message-Id: <199703250012.QAA22527@freefall.freebsd.org> Received: (qmail 19326 invoked from network); 25 Mar 1997 00:04:50 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 1997 00:04:50 -0000 To: Amancio Hasty Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OSS In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 24 Mar 1997 15:52:30 -0800 <199703242352.PAA01669@rah.star-gate.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <19318.859248287.1@scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 16:04:49 -0800 Sender: owner-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Of course. If I were reporting a bug, I would report all of these things, and more. Unfortunately, I haven't had time to accumulate information appropriate to a bug report, so I haven't reported this yet. So I was simply providing my point of vie that having a choice between the OSS driver and the current VoxWare driver was not necessarily a bad thing. I will be reporting a bug when I have more information. Unfortunately, the code that casuses it to manifest is in Modula-3, and I'm currently only 98% convinced that it is a driver bug and not in my own code... Steven > From: Amancio Hasty > Subject: Re: OSS > Well, when posting reference to bugs with the sound driver > we got start by : > 1. OS version > > 2. Sound Driver version > > 3. Sound Card > > 4. relevant sound configuration from the kernel config file > > 5. cat /dev/sndstat > > 6. Be a bit more descriptive about bug desription and if possible > provide code snippet which can reproduce the bug. > > > Amancio > > > >From The Desk Of grady@scam.XCF.Berkeley.EDU : > > > From: Amancio Hasty > > > Subject: Re: OSS > > > Well, > > > what this means is that we have to concentrate more on our existing > > > sound driver. Set up a project and a few good hackers to volunteer > > > to work on the sound driver. Probably, after this week I will > > > kick off the project -- web page, cvs , etc... However I will need > > > help ! So if no one volunteers then we are stuck with the existing > > > driver and with the OSS stuff. > > > > > At least we got a choice. > > ------------------------- > > Exactly. I would prefer a working sound driver with source, but > > the current choices are apparently a non-working sound driver with source, > > or a working (?) sound driver without source. I am in the middle > > of developing a sound-effects program, and I am stalled right now > > because the driver apparently has a bug. If I had the time, I'd > > try to track down the driver problem, but I consider it worth $20 > > for someone else to get it to work. (And if they don't get it working, > > too bad for them -- the word would get around that they don't provide > > a worthwhile product.) When I upgrade to 2.2, I'll buy it. > > > > Meanwhile, the source is available for people who want to go that > > route. > > > > Steven > > > > > > > > Amancio > > > > > > >From The Desk Of Tony Kimball : > > > > > > > > Hmmm... it doesn't look good. The 4Front pres., Dev Mazumdar, tells > > > > me that they want $150,000.00 for a source license. That just doesn't > > > > seem worthwhile to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >