From owner-cvs-all  Wed May  5  1: 3:41 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 23DC515832; Wed,  5 May 1999 01:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id HAA27979; Wed, 5 May 1999 07:53:30 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199905050553.HAA27979@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: Informing MAINTAINER (was: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/mt mt.1)
To: eivind@FreeBSD.org (Eivind Eklund)
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 07:53:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: grog@lemis.com, mjacob@feral.com, ghelmer@scl.ameslab.gov,
	ken@plutotech.com, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <19990505095845.D49159@bitbox.follo.net> from "Eivind Eklund" at May 5, 99 09:58:27 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 692       
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> Now consider it from the view of somebody doing changes - and they're
> usually doing changes because the maintainer has in some way been
> negligent (no offence meant).
...
> documentation/comment changes), where my guesstimate is that it would
> halve the productivity of the integrator.  For other changes I fully
> agree that the maintainer should be mailed; I just don't agree that
> this should have a much larger priority than actually getting things
> done.

as one of the (often :)) negligent people, my two cents are for
giving priority to getting things done with a grain of salt --
occasional mistakes can always be fixed, and committers are
responsible people.

	cheers
	luigi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message