From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 12 15:14:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF88106564A for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 15:14:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andenore@start.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D318FC0C for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 15:14:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andenore@start.no) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-3.01 (built Jul 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0K0R003Y2GZNQ890@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:14:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from duckjen.nextgentel.no ([84.48.194.205]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-3.01 (built Jul 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0K0R0095MGZMM700@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:14:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:12:56 +0200 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Anders Nore References: <20080509124308.GA596@britannica.bec.de> <9FC19AC2-DAD8-418C-8B9C-F129DEC58CEF@gmail.com> <20080511190741.GB47383@lizzy.catnook.local> Message-id: In-reply-to: <20080511190741.GB47383@lizzy.catnook.local> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.27 (FreeBSD) Cc: Subject: Re: Adding .db support to pkg_tools X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 15:14:13 -0000 On Sun, 11 May 2008 21:07:41 +0200, Jos Backus wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 06:38:25AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> +1. BDB is quite easy to corrupt... > > If we're going to use a binary file format, please consider using SQLite > instead. It has the right license, a nice API (transactions!) and is > robust > enough for yum to use it for a similar purpose. > One of the reasons for using BDB is that it is in the base system, SQLite however is not.