Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:40:26 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Heads up --- Thinking about UDP and tunneling Message-ID: <20081213054026.GF58682@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20081213134248.W7599@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <D72E9703-C8E7-4A21-A71E-A4B4C2D7E8F4@lakerest.net> <49249443.8050707@elischer.org> <76CF7D15-251F-4E43-86BE-AD96F48AF123@lakerest.net> <200811201450.30016.max@love2party.net> <24BD4A21-E10D-4E09-8C33-3FCF930A0495@lakerest.net> <494157DF.6030802@FreeBSD.org> <13C9478E-CBF6-4EDA-8E78-AD76549EB844@lakerest.net> <20081213030449.F2405@delplex.bde.org> <E5493B85-6578-49C5-9BE8-41157FB2E26D@lakerest.net> <20081213134248.W7599@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ON0CT8LY+wgE1XqS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2008-Dec-13 13:55:18 +1100, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> wrote: >I guess submitting patches for style(9) is considered a suicide method? Not necessarily but you need to have very good justification for any change. It's much easier to read a large corpus of code where the code is all written in one style. I suspect that no-one is happy with everything in style(9) but consistency is seen as more important. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --ON0CT8LY+wgE1XqS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklDSsoACgkQ/opHv/APuIf+nACaAvzUjeHB3DK2d/DNRUMdyrpB tyIAn3G80VCst6ol4tMStCm8mGrS5PoI =9czW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ON0CT8LY+wgE1XqS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081213054026.GF58682>