From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 24 03:05:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011A016A420 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:05:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-5.paradise.net.nz (bm-5a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCE643D45 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:05:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-3.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-5.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0IV600L1R8LFJ1@linda-5.paradise.net.nz> for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:05:39 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-29-134.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.29.134]) by smtp-3.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D946F4B81F2; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:05:38 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:05:36 +1300 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <2154.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1140749016.squirrel@172.16.0.1> To: Mike Jakubik Message-id: <43FE7800.4040808@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20051106) References: <43FE6DBD.5000006@paradise.net.nz> <2154.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1140749016.squirrel@172.16.0.1> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Peter Fraser Subject: Re: Virtual memory consumption (both user and kernel) in modern CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:05:42 -0000 Mike Jakubik wrote: > On Thu, February 23, 2006 9:21 pm, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > > >>The most likely culprit is the fact that redzones are enabled at the >>moment in -CURRENT. >> >>On that note, Mike - did you try turning them off? > > > Yes, it lowered my swap space usage from 40MB to 1MB. Which is certainly > better, but even before, my system used no swap. > Hmm, that's not so great - any idea about how much free memory you had using the old malloc? I'm interested, as I run 6.0R on a PIII with 512MB RAM and have (right now) 193MB free, that's with Enlightment, Firefox, Thunderbird, xmms, and several Eterms running - so needless to say it runs great. I'm wondering what the situation will look like with -CURRENT.... regards Mark