Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:14:29 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@teledomenet.gr> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Anton Nikiforov <anton@nikiforov.ru> Subject: Re: carp+pfsync+freevrrpd+jail Message-ID: <200607071014.29700.nvass@teledomenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <44AD688A.6050408@nikiforov.ru> References: <44AD688A.6050408@nikiforov.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 06 July 2006 22:46, Anton Nikiforov wrote: > Dear all. [snip] > > That means that in case some service (provided by jail managed by > freevrrpd) will be accessed from outside - i cannot be sure what host > will answer the request. > You have vrrp on jails and carp on the host system? That's probably not a good idea, they both use the same ether-type. Who is gonna get the incoming packet? carp or freevrrpd? both? I guess both. Who is gonna reply? Do you know if a vrrp packet confuses carp or conversely? nik:0:~$ grep carp /etc/protocols carp 112 CARP vrrp # Common Address Redundancy Protocol
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607071014.29700.nvass>