From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 00:27:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E623E106566C for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 00:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA7C8FC0A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 00:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-64-49.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.64.49]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p840A7BS094969; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 02:10:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <4E62C1DE.3040404@bananmonarki.se> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:10:06 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110821 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brett Glass References: <201109031639.KAA25689@lariat.net> In-Reply-To: <201109031639.KAA25689@lariat.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "at" command and mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 00:27:09 -0000 2011-09-03 18:39, Brett Glass skrev: > I'm setting up a FreeBSD appliance that won't be running a mail daemon. > I'd like the at(8) command to be there for scheduling of commands, but > do not see any way to prevent it from trying to send mail after it > executes a command. (There's not even a command line option that says > "do not mail," or at least I can't find one.) Am I missing something, or > does at(8) always expect to be able to send mail? If so, would it be > worth implementing an atrun.conf configuration file that makes it > optional and possibly sets other defaults for at(8)? > This is quick AND dirty Put this in your crontab: MAILTO="" N.B You will not get ANY mail from cron jobs! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 01:44:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003251065670 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 01:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jordanbhandy@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF1A8FC13 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 01:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so12338971pzk.18 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:44:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=a/I9NxmRcQ75r1EBhkQkqbCNpZX8TghpHl9TrADA3I0=; b=Iqocp5c+eyIUopWYrw/gVB4PwuSRHPID8alW9DcaDQAZr4cmiazme5eI9aEiiLMK/i YwdjSe+NExvXOmIO42431i9Sj0CBd66mUKVHB0YFMHOeBCE3gX0iNpICm/VlUxyilIG3 wfaVQSCsvYfyJ+icdO1s9+Sah+P48FxPNgKPs= Received: by 10.68.20.197 with SMTP id p5mr1927053pbe.284.1315099007675; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (c-98-202-122-208.hsd1.ut.comcast.net. [98.202.122.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m1sm10148565pbf.3.2011.09.03.18.16.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:16:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Monkeyfoahead Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 19:16:44 -0600 Message-Id: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Routing Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 01:44:14 -0000 I have a question that I thought that you could probably answer. = I have setup a freebsd seedbox in my apartment. This box has two = internet connections (multi-homed server.). One is an ethernet = connection behind a firewall that is connected to a Comcast modem. The = other is my apartment's wifi. I desire to use the wifi for torrenting = and my connection for http,ftp, and ssh access. The proper ports have = been forwarded to the freebsd server from the firewall on the Comcast = connection. My problem is when the default route is set to go over the = wifi, i cannot access the server from the comcast modem address. When my = default route is set to go over the modem, my server is accessible to = the outside world. Due to the nature of the torrent-dameon i am using. I must have the = default route go over the wifi connection. Is there a route i can add = that will fix my problem?=20 Thanks for your help. Jordan = --------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------------ ifconfig output: fxp0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 1500 options=3D2009 ether 00:12:3f:a4:59:ef inet 10.0.1.5 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=3D8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3D3 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4=20 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128=20 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000=20 nd6 options=3D3 wlan0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 1500 ether 00:1e:e5:ff:1d:49 inet 1.1.3.153 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 1.1.3.255 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/11Mbps mode 11g status: associated ssid "Elms D South" channel 9 (2452 MHz 11g) bssid = 00:16:01:59:e4:c0 regdomain FCC indoor ecm authmode OPEN privacy ON deftxkey 1 wepkey 1:40-bit txpower 27 bmiss 7 scanvalid 450 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode = CTS wme burst roaming MANUAL = --------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------------ The boxes routing table is as follows: Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif = Expire default 1.1.3.1 UGS 2245 253352 wlan0 = <-------- Wireless=20 1.1.3.0/24 link#5 U 1 421 wlan0 1.1.3.153 link#5 UHS 0 0 lo0 10.0.1.0/24 link#2 U 2 6098 fxp0 10.0.1.5 link#2 UHS 0 0 lo0 = <--------- Comcast 127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 0 34 lo0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags = Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH = lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 link#4 U = lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#4 UHS = lo0 ff01:4::/32 fe80::1%lo0 U = lo0 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 U = lo0 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 02:26:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C9F106564A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 02:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFF18FC0A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 02:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so3481896fxe.13 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 19:26:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oB5WTcBP2ZU+GTXHxGXKupiATRwYfnJGr/ye5C8g4AI=; b=i7n6/sPc9l817hd8TtirweGglLsOq7omUVxXkYX4fsTVOQn5FC4+jYzqmjc86sRK11 MoDEcXfQHqpa9gAmJhGQwn3sq46dYHtoo4zqjleFatSXkFEbq3yEz9xvsF7ZpnBiObMC 8VTgIBb66OHUu2fp8ZW+9YcoV4bBFIvJfcyck= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.55.205 with SMTP id v13mr3072383fag.88.1315103216142; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 19:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.120.72 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 19:26:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201109032142.PAA27491@lariat.net> References: <201109031639.KAA25689@lariat.net> <201109032035.p83KZfse010717@mail.r-bonomi.com> <201109032142.PAA27491@lariat.net> Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 21:26:56 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Brett Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: "at" command and mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:26:57 -0000 On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > > One way to avoid problems would be to create a file name from a timestamp > and a pid. > > The key thing, though, is to avoid mailing on machines that don't have > mail. > Call a shell script which preforms the actions you want. Regular old /bin/sh scripting is a worthwhile skill: Something quick: #!/bin/sh OUTPUT=$(your/app) if [ -e /usr/sbin/sendmail ]; then echo $OUTPUT | mail -s "Subject" $USER else echo $OUTPUT > ${USER}_`date +\%Y\%m\%d`.log fi -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 03:05:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF48106566B for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 03:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0ED18FC14 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 03:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so3499156fxe.13 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 20:05:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4Wn/0uzDP7NKsEak2MfLYxMk/M3LKxHa8OVBv8E6tfc=; b=i2dH2HIRTcIg8pxVm8jyOLdPWy1ItbnMvjnUh76Y2sqHi86ktd9enBfYDxOFWC04X5 4M2ndEQsFj/7pFPjQML/6EkuBGYXDYDE+KFNhrJkExgDZFKZXfT7AJWegc5Zas9FgZm+ D9zIIZ0zq324lED4Ydn6SGw5bk4WoZvWgzK9c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.6.91 with SMTP id 27mr2121540fay.145.1315105557796; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 20:05:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.120.72 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 20:05:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:05:57 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Monkeyfoahead Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routing Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 03:05:59 -0000 On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Monkeyfoahead wrote: > I have a question that I thought that you could probably answer. I > have setup a freebsd seedbox in my apartment. This box has two internet > connections (multi-homed server.). One is an ethernet connection behind a > firewall that is connected to a Comcast modem. The other is my apartment's > wifi. I desire to use the wifi for torrenting and my connection for > http,ftp, and ssh access. The proper ports have been forwarded to the > freebsd server from the firewall on the Comcast connection. My problem is > when the default route is set to go over the wifi, i cannot access the > server from the comcast modem address. When my default route is set to go > over the modem, my server is accessible to the outside world. > > Due to the nature of the torrent-dameon i am using. I must have the default > route go over the wifi connection. Is there a route i can add that will fix > my problem? > I believe you'll want to use fib's eg setfib(1) and assign your torrent client to use the fib associated with your wifi. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 04:28:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241CD1065670 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 04:28:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy3.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7F738FC16 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 04:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10681 invoked by uid 0); 4 Sep 2011 04:28:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 4 Sep 2011 04:28:27 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=S9LsY6uWqdiJRtHl/lmcPtcuMSqQ7DtiHvyu5y9gz3Y=; b=fB15vekiynBJKVPHZ0jJJDjZkx5kxfOXoZvHvUnvqbnPF5u4p5shc9xK2JFbQtx7aSOtdvLJlltbWGlFyvTDDOZAsXCmg8Xh6Kg8yIcLN98Bx9A2Opti58wMVBJqBk3F; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R04Jm-0008JB-BD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 22:28:27 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 03 Sep 2011 22:09:48 -0600 Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:09:48 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110904040948.GC89500@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD References: <20110902165636.64533247@scorpio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xesSdrSSBC0PokLI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: [OT] pfSense Book Publisher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 04:28:28 -0000 --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 05:33:40PM -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote: >=20 > Thanks. I knew it was published in Amazon but I want to purchase > another format other than Kindle because I use B&N's nook. > I want to locate the publisher to see if they have other formats like > ePub or PDF. I think the point of giving you that URI is to get you to click through to the specific book you want and check the publisher's name on the relevant page. It should look something like this: Publisher: Reed Media Services; 1st edition (November 1, 2009) Note that this is the publisher for "pfSense: The Definitive Guide", which I chose based on the fact it was the first pfSense book on that page. It's not the publisher for any other pfSense books such as the pfSense 2 Cookbook. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk5i+gwACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKX5XQCgmLzCWYQZrqW6AGnZw1oYmJlQ pLYAni8hYBrRfhRG2fV3myvDjxXw/nBK =5p3L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 05:12:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BC2106566C for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 05:12:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3B98FC20 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 05:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WildRover.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA29689 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 23:12:50 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201109040512.XAA29689@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:12:52 -0600 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Huge interrupt overhead reported after RAM added to Atom-based system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 05:12:55 -0000 Have been doing more experimentation regarding this problem. It doesn't occur with a 1 GB memory module in the machine, nor with a 2 GB module -- only a 4 GB module. This makes me wonder if there's some sort of memory bank switching or extended addressing mechanism here (like PAE). Perhaps it's causing some sort of interrupt every time a certain area of memory (perhaps the topmost portion) is accessed? I'd like to experiment with having FreeBSD try to use less than the full 4 GB (e.g., to make it act as if memory ended at, say, 3 GB) but I'm not sure how to tell the kernel to do that. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 05:46:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2785E1065677 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 05:46:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BB18FC1F for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 05:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WildRover.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA29825; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 23:46:21 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201109040546.XAA29825@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:46:25 -0600 To: Adam Vande More From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: References: <201109031639.KAA25689@lariat.net> <201109032035.p83KZfse010717@mail.r-bonomi.com> <201109032142.PAA27491@lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: "at" command and mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 05:46:32 -0000 At 08:26 PM 9/3/2011, Adam Vande More wrote: >Call a shell script which preforms the actions you want. Needlessly complex, and doesn't handle the case of stderr. Since the utility has the ability to force mail to be sent, it should also have an option not to send it, IMHO. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 05:51:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052FD1065673 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 05:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0221c872c2=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50888FC12 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 05:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69018 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2011 05:24:26 -0000 Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 4 Sep 2011 05:24:26 -0000 Date: 4 Sep 2011 05:24:04 -0000 Message-ID: <20110904052404.79122.qmail@joyce.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <201109040512.XAA29689@lariat.net> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: brett@lariat.net Subject: Re: Huge interrupt overhead reported after RAM added to Atom-based system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 05:51:08 -0000 >I'd like to experiment with having FreeBSD try to use less than the >full 4 GB (e.g., to make it act as if memory ended at, say, 3 GB) >but I'm not sure how to tell the kernel to do that. In /boot/loader.conf set "hw.physmem" to whatever size you want it to use. "man loader" for more info R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 06:20:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B13106564A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 06:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jordanbhandy@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4D18FC16 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 06:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so12620100pzk.18 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:20:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=4A1JnpROW6p6rspj7VeHFpjyBRT/g8O/e/2fF1WEmf0=; b=pXtdnO1vfJCRa3KCMBeSBmesdsuiXczahp+i3v7nY/65ATlN/D3RxiqEdNsTRXR8NV vxtBt6KqEl/Ye9UQ4krdR5FS3hAwrX0yx7Vn+Gq70L7LR4XrbZE66M7ETalLcwKJlsn3 nEToMuxPm8jkTffkk3x47hL1wXEfSG7+j9lN0= Received: by 10.68.155.242 with SMTP id vz18mr5433994pbb.322.1315117242368; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (c-98-202-122-208.hsd1.ut.comcast.net. [98.202.122.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e3sm11851098pbi.7.2011.09.03.23.20.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:20:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Monkeyfoahead Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 00:20:38 -0600 Message-Id: <1ACC86BC-CCEC-4BAB-A637-012657FDD56E@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: setfib help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 06:20:43 -0000 Hello, I wish to torrent (with transmission) over one interface and = access my server from the web over another interface. I have compiled my = kernel with 2 routing tables. Is there a way I can configure each table = for each interface automatically? Thanks=20 Jordan= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 10:17:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15D21065672 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from richard@blueapex.co.uk) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686728FC14 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.66.2.54] (82-68-0-20.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.68.0.20]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M5gZk-1ROQgZ2tjc-00xrzP; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:05:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4E634D5D.5010209@blueapex.co.uk> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:05:17 +0100 From: Richard Collyer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110830 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:r+mZ3xADCIl9/i8jr7uxH0M9LEFbMStdU4c4p+MzGgx QwGEvSPaFlmiLsLjZ0eLV6bBwIZ5e2/uMD6B3SXaKz8tW1vdtW 4LBBJfr+HQCnhiWu/Dx/DHshpc9dVrOZY1pkfHCsm7LgYxv5zY fjtgduncAvgsg2mairRsmQXj2JKYAzD+4Jx4863iJzgyiCwxEz PvfQtjiuF/xpI8DOHCbn7m7026RsLjHSmO6mPL+cLSZIlqXyST aAQwzWb0HzyJVN3LOUxFXSqwtFtjAad+H++h6oIPXrmdB2gGLl uRHpbADRoaUBQomN4OkOcd8q/2FilgB6vg/yW3KLmY5bnE0snZ xfOutsgq/btn3xgs/wXc= Subject: Date Ports Installed or Install Log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:17:57 -0000 Hi all, I was trying to get CUPS working last night and installed gutenprint-cups but the make failed half way through - managed to get the printer working without it so no longer need it. As a result its installed a fair number of packaged (mostly X11 related) that I don't need on this headless server so I'd like to tidy them up. Is there a way of finding out what date/order ports have been installed or is the output that is sent over ssh logged anywhere so I can trace back and find out what packages I need to nerf. I've run cutleaves and portmaster to show ports that have are not referenced by others but as this was the only thing I installed yesterday might be quicker/easier to do it via examining logs. Thanks in advance, Richard __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6434 (20110903) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 11:03:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32091065673 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8D88FC12 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p84B37Fw027680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:03:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p84B37Fw027680 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315134187; bh=TWPJFjwnCt2BS6335AN3OgAmuGfiJ9Gn3XDbTQn4PTQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E635AE3.6050505@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S un,=2004=20Sep=202011=2012:02:59=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.1)=20Gecko/2 0110830=20Thunderbird/6.0.1|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Richard=20Co llyer=20|CC:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.o rg|Subject:=20Re:=20Date=20Ports=20Installed=20or=20Install=20Log| References:=20<4E634D5D.5010209@blueapex.co.uk>|In-Reply-To:=20<4E 634D5D.5010209@blueapex.co.uk>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.3.1|OpenPGP :=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dp gp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A =20boundary=3D"------------enigC65006AB510CAFDEAB8A8641"; b=lLEAOHTGH7kewW7i7BVHnjg6iq8m0s6NaBjsoxrfoqtBCvrlcYJhQhhMLOZP7s6ll wfX0a52b304eeicfFlgCJ9W6Nh93t0fY9KIbyDaX4FCAEHfAHY3Y5j6FkpfwO01rbV 6lRQ9cxNWNqAej6WPUWLs+OAz1Qpdje/mQ6VvNZ0= Message-ID: <4E635AE3.6050505@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:02:59 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Collyer References: <4E634D5D.5010209@blueapex.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E634D5D.5010209@blueapex.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC65006AB510CAFDEAB8A8641" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Date Ports Installed or Install Log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:03:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC65006AB510CAFDEAB8A8641 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/09/2011 11:05, Richard Collyer wrote: > I was trying to get CUPS working last night and installed > gutenprint-cups but the make failed half way through - managed to get > the printer working without it so no longer need it. As a result its > installed a fair number of packaged (mostly X11 related) that I don't > need on this headless server so I'd like to tidy them up. >=20 > Is there a way of finding out what date/order ports have been installed= > or is the output that is sent over ssh logged anywhere so I can trace > back and find out what packages I need to nerf. Look at the file modification times in the directories under /var/db/pkg -- that will tell you the last time the port was updated or installed. Note: you can't rely on the modification time of the port directory itself. Tools like portmaster(1) will create additional files within the directory, which affects that timestamp. An example -- choosing one of my installed ports pretty much arbitrarily: lucid-nonsense:/var/db/pkg:% ls -la postgresql-client-9.0.4_1/ total 107 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 29 Jun 11 23:22 +COMMENT -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 112912 Jul 9 10:23 +CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1282 Jun 11 23:22 +DESC -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 831 Jun 11 23:22 +DISPLAY -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 17550 Jun 11 23:22 +MTREE_DIRS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 771 Sep 3 09:19 +REQUIRED_BY drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 8 Sep 3 09:19 ./ drwxr-xr-x 377 root wheel 377 Sep 3 09:22 ../ You can see that there are 3 different dates here: Sept 3rd at 09:19 -- this is the last time I ran portmaster to update my ports. Note that its the +REQUIRED_BY file that has been updated. One of the ports that requires postgresql-client was updated then. Jul 11 at 23:22 -- most of the files were modified at this time, and it is in fact when I last updated postgresql-client on that machine. Jul 9 at 10:23 -- +CONTENTS is a few days older than the other files. This is because I installed postgresql-client from a package I'd built in a separate jail a slightly earlier. This is the date the package was built. Therefore, in order to see the packages installed during your abortive attempt to deal with gutenprint-cups, try: # cd /usr/ports/packages # ls -lrt */+COMMENT That will list all your installed ports in order of the last time they were updated, most recent ones last. You should be able to identify the appropriate date range and work from there. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigC65006AB510CAFDEAB8A8641 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5jWusACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwIrQCePL05e8KVkoOP3gMQSJWMyCy5 B+gAnRmLZhcHbUmg2RX9uf2ZL3ZJb00u =P9/D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC65006AB510CAFDEAB8A8641-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 11:10:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCDC106567C for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from richard@blueapex.co.uk) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34C38FC14 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.66.2.54] (82-68-0-20.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.68.0.20]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M8opw-1Qugws1DGW-00CTAk; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 13:09:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4E635C84.7020608@blueapex.co.uk> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:09:56 +0100 From: Richard Collyer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110830 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4E634D5D.5010209@blueapex.co.uk> <4E635AE3.6050505@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E635AE3.6050505@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:m7QJlZzi/CqurkoWpAdgU2FKgt6AejGXJvyq5wbnwUw p3lOxbShpdWSOcP2eDA0/cbOsXlhhh41lM2cnm1DmcL1ZUE3Nq HZzXNYRzSJz9368XIOu4WtvufC/SlUiD3c1zdwKUhFLODg8MDR d2Ob+7tfdRwgi5bPcwJJd9bqbgzPc8YeM6Eq+wIbT++4cbwhfY 1OLjdFPbmG/eAqCRb1s5jvQe5rKjE1MLuYQBc5RQ5qZDuUmyfs /EvXL0D86B8A0JergF4yhI6jM2SPjYBeWwkyLvqdKiw21QHliw 8mFxDMOUyZQ/OppAzPLIGUMyqliooROY9PR2hCx0nd1Ehs53fA /icMA8CKMCEj6qiCscAA= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Date Ports Installed or Install Log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:10:12 -0000 On 04/09/2011 12:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 04/09/2011 11:05, Richard Collyer wrote: >> I was trying to get CUPS working last night and installed >> gutenprint-cups but the make failed half way through - managed to get >> the printer working without it so no longer need it. As a result its >> installed a fair number of packaged (mostly X11 related) that I don't >> need on this headless server so I'd like to tidy them up. >> >> Is there a way of finding out what date/order ports have been installed >> or is the output that is sent over ssh logged anywhere so I can trace >> back and find out what packages I need to nerf. > Look at the file modification times in the directories under /var/db/pkg > -- that will tell you the last time the port was updated or installed. > > Note: you can't rely on the modification time of the port directory > itself. Tools like portmaster(1) will create additional files within > the directory, which affects that timestamp. An example -- choosing one > of my installed ports pretty much arbitrarily: > > lucid-nonsense:/var/db/pkg:% ls -la postgresql-client-9.0.4_1/ > total 107 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 29 Jun 11 23:22 +COMMENT > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 112912 Jul 9 10:23 +CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1282 Jun 11 23:22 +DESC > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 831 Jun 11 23:22 +DISPLAY > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 17550 Jun 11 23:22 +MTREE_DIRS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 771 Sep 3 09:19 +REQUIRED_BY > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 8 Sep 3 09:19 ./ > drwxr-xr-x 377 root wheel 377 Sep 3 09:22 ../ > > You can see that there are 3 different dates here: > > Sept 3rd at 09:19 -- this is the last time I ran portmaster to > update my ports. Note that its the +REQUIRED_BY file that > has been updated. One of the ports that requires > postgresql-client was updated then. > > Jul 11 at 23:22 -- most of the files were modified at this > time, and it is in fact when I last updated postgresql-client > on that machine. > > Jul 9 at 10:23 -- +CONTENTS is a few days older than the other > files. This is because I installed postgresql-client from a > package I'd built in a separate jail a slightly earlier. This > is the date the package was built. > > Therefore, in order to see the packages installed during your abortive > attempt to deal with gutenprint-cups, try: > > # cd /usr/ports/packages > # ls -lrt */+COMMENT > > That will list all your installed ports in order of the last time they > were updated, most recent ones last. You should be able to identify the > appropriate date range and work from there. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > Thanks Matthew you are a star. Just incase anyone else reads this for a solution I think the cd /usr/ports/packages line near the bottom was a typo and should have been /var/db/pkg which confused me for a while as I wasn't getting any packages listed using the first dir. Many thanks for the help, Richard __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6434 (20110903) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 11:27:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193FD1065672 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s5.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s5.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC708FC0A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP165 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s5.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 4 Sep 2011 04:27:31 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.105.57] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.105.57]) by BLU0-SMTP165.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 4 Sep 2011 04:27:29 -0700 Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3RsBk867g4z2CG4t for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 07:27:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 07:27:28 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Sep 2011 11:27:29.0977 (UTC) FILETIME=[A1BA3A90:01CC6AF5] Subject: Possible obsolete entries in /etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:27:32 -0000 A while ago, at least a year or more I would guess, I saw something about placing a couple of entries in the "/etc/make.conf" file to correct a problem with "Firefox". I am currently using Firefox-6.0.1 on FreeBSD-8.2. These are the entries I am wondering about: WITH_MOZILLA=firefox WITH_GECKO=libxul Are they still relevant, or can I just remove them. Honestly, I do not remember exactly what they do anymore, anyway. Thanks! -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com If Google is all about openness, where is the public repository for the search engine? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 11:38:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172151065670 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:38:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE568FC1C for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p84BcEWo028086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:38:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p84BcEWo028086 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315136294; bh=e8t4qUVytN3KVe+BFvCuBCQQ5W0dP+MsGmaE82/xJkk=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E63631F.8030807@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S un,=2004=20Sep=202011=2012:38:07=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.1)=20Gecko/2 0110830=20Thunderbird/6.0.1|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Richard=20Co llyer=20|CC:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.o rg|Subject:=20Re:=20Date=20Ports=20Installed=20or=20Install=20Log| References:=20<4E634D5D.5010209@blueapex.co.uk>=20<4E635AE3.605050 5@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20<4E635C84.7020608@blueapex.co.uk>|In-R eply-To:=20<4E635C84.7020608@blueapex.co.uk>|X-Enigmail-Version:=2 01.3.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3 B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signa ture"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig848836A6C169FB7597EB6 6F6"; b=GOIHA26iOeXOJ5X4Twd3deexPGCWqrYAo1yAjKsMYfphd6loVQka7ODkA0G8Lu4Ky LnnII09kuZGee7+kF2GK71zIjcvQlgYkBOSFxhnwwHRCO53L6y6Vsq0SerE0WA+i8K 9r9Mw1pSHdYDr2Y2JmHoUoPE5TCAEzaJ1w6ymHZI= Message-ID: <4E63631F.8030807@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:38:07 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Collyer References: <4E634D5D.5010209@blueapex.co.uk> <4E635AE3.6050505@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4E635C84.7020608@blueapex.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E635C84.7020608@blueapex.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig848836A6C169FB7597EB66F6" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Date Ports Installed or Install Log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:38:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig848836A6C169FB7597EB66F6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/09/2011 12:09, Richard Collyer wrote: > Just incase anyone else reads this for a solution I think the cd > /usr/ports/packages line near the bottom was a typo and should have bee= n > /var/db/pkg Yes. Dammit. One of these days I'll perfect the art of writing down exactly what I want to say. Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig848836A6C169FB7597EB66F6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5jYyUACgkQ8Mjk52CukIygqwCfUOmC2wOBOOdW3AlxoD3CrKuL WhgAmgJeiHknwN4x/k6scawEx/mbyHN5 =6dwe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig848836A6C169FB7597EB66F6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 11:42:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7998106564A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:42:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B96F8FC13 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16C61DD7F; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 13:42:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p84BgI7w002039; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 13:42:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 13:42:18 +0200 From: Polytropon To: FreeBSD Message-Id: <20110904134218.16da794a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Carmel Subject: Re: Possible obsolete entries in /etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:42:20 -0000 On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 07:27:28 -0400, Carmel wrote: > A while ago, at least a year or more I would guess, I saw something > about placing a couple of entries in the "/etc/make.conf" file to > correct a problem with "Firefox". I am currently using Firefox-6.0.1 on > FreeBSD-8.2. These are the entries I am wondering about: > > WITH_MOZILLA=firefox > WITH_GECKO=libxul > > Are they still relevant, or can I just remove them. Honestly, I do not > remember exactly what they do anymore, anyway. I can't name the particular port, but I think I remember that some port required Mozilla (!= Firefox!) as a dependency for using its HTML engine for its help system. Those options prevented the installation of Mozilla and made the port use Firefox instead. This situation appeared when the port that was not seen to have anything to do with web browsing caused the installation of Mozilla, even if Firefox was already installed (and also if it was not). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 11:56:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30313106564A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B638FC0A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p84Btqvp028349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:55:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p84Btqvp028349 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315137353; bh=x1L6T4xR/QvtuhaE/ByEo8sYlDjBP0KPwp9QSLH9+Cw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E636742.8040802@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S un,=2004=20Sep=202011=2012:55:46=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.1)=20Gecko/2 0110830=20Thunderbird/6.0.1|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20FreeBSD=20|CC:=20Carmel=20|Subject:=20Re:=20Possible=20obsolete=20entries=20in=20/etc/make .conf|References:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|X -Enigmail-Version:=201.3.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:= 20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"a pplication/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigE FB95288D3AAB1DAB1D5659B"; b=GRnOsCN7vi8ozx1uk3zibF+ZhV9/Zq1GnLviFRUdCFSrGrW0PZe9wB4jf8aMKxj/G kZCy1SSEcEIkIaU7ZxTgcSfe4xFxKp+ZI2g4PQiG2dLf8Dzblc3db3ZIUHTR3cJmJo ZNUjAcTH3wwP6AP4b7n86pGVdSCgh5fW9ryGTvXM= Message-ID: <4E636742.8040802@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:55:46 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEFB95288D3AAB1DAB1D5659B" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Carmel Subject: Re: Possible obsolete entries in /etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:56:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEFB95288D3AAB1DAB1D5659B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/09/2011 12:27, Carmel wrote: > WITH_MOZILLA=3Dfirefox This seems to be obsolete -- there's no choice to use firefox available. Grepping the ports tree produces only 2 ports that mention WITH_MOZILLA (mail/mail-notification and deskutils/google-gadgets) and in those cases, WITH_MOZILLA is an OPTIONS setting, ie. effectively a boolean. > WITH_GECKO=3Dlibxul This is the default, and the only choice at the moment. There is meant to be an option to use libxul-devel if desired, but there isn't actually a libxul-devel port in the tree right now, so it won't do anything for yo= u. > Are they still relevant, or can I just remove them. Honestly, I do not > remember exactly what they do anymore, anyway. You can just delete them. If you want to see what WITH_GECKO does in mre detail, look at /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigEFB95288D3AAB1DAB1D5659B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5jZ0gACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzojACglcB+ErSZfl2aPx6XKDyto3DV POAAn2JDoWK4Mf824sRBKpifbVxD3EX1 =UIwX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEFB95288D3AAB1DAB1D5659B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 17:31:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA121065670 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 17:31:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven.e.friedrich@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A478FC08 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 17:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxh11 with SMTP id 11so4295106vxh.13 for ; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:31:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=T/ByCxSBwb9RhRXt8AISJb+ySL3CvhQ34JXcLgoVet0=; b=kGd6S+dmGsIBzwJUR4aSZapukGo9Z3puFc+KUYH4WiTIc5WP1HCuTGpDcOmkJfECLA RTb6gtb17QZtweEfqvybUTvSA9K8Tb4bV1QCRldMGBsnWU+li3HHlPAGSqmc0Ds+fKkl qubyseIPydJidsMFroi9UDPRPqoB154TtHqL4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.188.193 with SMTP id gc1mr3185888vdc.209.1315157464964; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.164.1 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:31:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 13:31:04 -0400 Message-ID: From: Steven Friedrich To: Alejandro Imass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: [OT] pfSense Book Publisher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:31:06 -0000 Product Details - *Paperback:* 516 pages - *Publisher:* Reed Media Services; 1st edition (November 1, 2009) - *Language:* English - *ISBN-10:* 0979034280 - *ISBN-13:* 978-0979034282 - *Product Dimensions: *9.6 x 7.5 x 1.1 inches - *Shipping Weight:* 2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies) On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Hi, > > Anybody know the editorial/publisher of the psSense book? > > Thanks, > > -- > Alejandro Imass > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 18:01:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909AA106566B for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4248FC16 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WildRover.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA04495 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:01:01 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201109041801.MAA04495@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:01:03 -0600 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Cutting sendmail out of the loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 18:01:04 -0000 I'm creating some small FreeBSD servers that shouldn't be able to send mail to, or receive mail from, the outside world. I was originally just going to set sendmail_enable="NONE" in /etc/rc.conf and turn off the mailing of output from various utilities (e.g. cron), but alas there seem to be a few programs I may need to run that insist upon sending mail. So, I'd like to see if I can set up local delivery of mail without invoking the memory- and cpu-hungry program that is sendmail. I'm therefore wondering what would happen if I just put /usr/libexec.mail.local in as "sendmail" and "send-mail" in mailer.conf and leaving out the rest of the entries. Does anyone on the list have experience with doing this or something similar? Sendmail has a lot of command line options that mail.local does not, but they seem to be rarely invoked by programs that do things such as mail output to a local user. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 21:02:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BD2106566C for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:02:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D468FC1B for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so2481914ewy.13 for ; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 14:02:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vBpJA8ZRakh7FguIpGyYuFWgLmIpG55yIH5MGG30SmM=; b=FBAgHWtogeDRWepu3+ZaPycwzOBEIBcs8xYedJZVuHr/fW/EclAOhP5wgvZ0orThUB ZaCCNW+0j8yXaaRrTPVm7fG2zaBL36gHLz5j6YYBihURKP4yoGVXpyrUlPlYDwpkkvLy dsTTKmMwa6AcjtSDynt71Qf4HOrxWAeRVgAs0= Received: by 10.213.17.210 with SMTP id t18mr540142eba.0.1315168544386; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 13:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (5ED0E470.cm-7-1d.dynamic.ziggo.nl [94.208.228.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u14sm6962451eeh.1.2011.09.04.13.35.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Sep 2011 13:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E63E11C.4040408@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:35:40 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brett Glass References: <201109041801.MAA04495@lariat.net> In-Reply-To: <201109041801.MAA04495@lariat.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cutting sendmail out of the loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 21:02:07 -0000 Brett Glass schreef: > I'm creating some small FreeBSD servers that shouldn't be able to send > mail to, or receive mail from, the outside world. I was originally > just going to set sendmail_enable="NONE" in /etc/rc.conf and turn off > the mailing of output from various utilities (e.g. cron), but alas > there seem to be a few programs I may need to run that insist upon > sending mail. So, I'd like to see if I can set up local delivery of > mail without invoking the memory- and cpu-hungry program that is > sendmail. I'm therefore wondering what would happen if I just put > /usr/libexec.mail.local in as "sendmail" and "send-mail" in > mailer.conf and leaving out the rest of the entries. Does anyone on > the list have experience with doing this or something similar? > Sendmail has a lot of command line options that mail.local does not, > but they seem to be rarely invoked by programs that do things such as > mail output to a local user. > > --Brett Glass > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Maybe ssmtp is something you can use. It is in ports, it does get mail out of the system. I use it on all of my servers so i can receive the cron mails and so on. Personaly i think sendmail should be replaced by such small mailer. Also Dragonfly has removed Sendmail for there own small and clean mailer called DMA. DMA - DragonFly Mail Agent Gr Johan Hendriks Double L From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 21:58:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DF0106564A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:58:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65CE8FC0C for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WildRover.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA05877; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:44:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201109042144.PAA05877@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:44:45 -0600 To: Johan Hendriks From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <4E63E11C.4040408@gmail.com> References: <201109041801.MAA04495@lariat.net> <4E63E11C.4040408@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cutting sendmail out of the loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 21:58:39 -0000 Johan: Actually, since the system I'm building is meant to be very secure and appliance-like, it doesn't ever need to get mail "out of the system." And it has limited memory, so it shouldn't be running a mail daemon. At most, it needs a mail system that can ONLY mail locally, solely for the purpose of satisfying programs that want to send users status via mail. (The mail files will be trimmed by newsyslog, so they can't consume infinite space.) Even the Dragonfly mail daemon would be overkill. I've tried putting mail.local(8) in as the "sendmail" program in mailer.conf, but it turns out that there are problems with command line options. Not only doesn't mail.local(8) understand all of the fancy options that Sendmail accepts; it doesn't even understand some of the simpler ones that are emitted by mail(8)! For example, mail(8) uses the -i option when invoking sendmail, to keep it from treating lines with just a dot as an end of file marker. mail.local(8) doesn't even have that "feature;" it always waits for EOF. So, it doesn't have that command line option and balks if you include it. I'm thinking that a simple wrapper around mail.local(8) that processed the command line options (Has anyone written one? I find it hard to believe that no one has) would allow mail.local to serve as a local mailer and bypass sendmail(8). If someone handed it an address with an "@" (or, for that matter, anything else that wasn't the name of a local user), mail.local(8) would just reject it. --Brett Glass At 02:35 PM 9/4/2011, Johan Hendriks wrote: >Maybe ssmtp is something you can use. >It is in ports, it does get mail out of the system. >I use it on all of my servers so i can receive the cron mails and so on. > >Personaly i think sendmail should be replaced by such small mailer. >Also Dragonfly has removed Sendmail for there own small and clean >mailer called DMA. >DMA - DragonFly Mail Agent > >Gr >Johan Hendriks >Double L > > > >----- >No virus found in this message. >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3876 - Release Date: 09/04/11 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 22:08:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68681065672 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999B78FC13 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadx2 with SMTP id x2so7312737iad.13 for ; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:08:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.47.193 with SMTP id ut1mr3125781icb.219.1315174091880; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.131.67 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:08:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201109042144.PAA05877@lariat.net> References: <201109041801.MAA04495@lariat.net> <4E63E11C.4040408@gmail.com> <201109042144.PAA05877@lariat.net> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:08:11 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: Brett Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Johan Hendriks , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cutting sendmail out of the loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:08:12 -0000 I might suggest installing qmail, and running qmail-send only. This involves moving /usr/sbin/sendmail out of the way, and ln -s /var/qmail/bin/sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail which satisfies every invocation of sendmail I've seen. YMMV. - M On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > Johan: > > Actually, since the system I'm building is meant to be very secure and > appliance-like, it doesn't ever need to get mail "out of the system." And it > has limited memory, so it shouldn't be running a mail daemon. At most, it > needs a mail system that can ONLY mail locally, solely for the purpose of > satisfying programs that want to send users status via mail. (The mail files > will be trimmed by newsyslog, so they can't consume infinite space.) Even > the Dragonfly mail daemon would be overkill. > > I've tried putting mail.local(8) in as the "sendmail" program in > mailer.conf, but it turns out that there are problems with command line > options. Not only doesn't mail.local(8) understand all of the fancy options > that Sendmail accepts; it doesn't even understand some of the simpler ones > that are emitted by mail(8)! For example, mail(8) uses the -i option when > invoking sendmail, to keep it from treating lines with just a dot as an end > of file marker. mail.local(8) doesn't even have that "feature;" it always > waits for EOF. So, it doesn't have that command line option and balks if you > include it. > > I'm thinking that a simple wrapper around mail.local(8) that processed the > command line options (Has anyone written one? I find it hard to believe that > no one has) would allow mail.local to serve as a local mailer and bypass > sendmail(8). If someone handed it an address with an "@" (or, for that > matter, anything else that wasn't the name of a local user), mail.local(8) > would just reject it. > > --Brett Glass > > At 02:35 PM 9/4/2011, Johan Hendriks wrote: > >> Maybe ssmtp is something you can use. >> It is in ports, it does get mail out of the system. >> I use it on all of my servers so i can receive the cron mails and so on. >> >> Personaly i think sendmail should be replaced by such small mailer. >> Also Dragonfly has removed Sendmail for there own small and clean mailer >> called DMA. >> DMA - DragonFly Mail Agent >> >> Gr >> Johan Hendriks >> Double L >> >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3876 - Release Date: 09/04/11 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 22:19:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A904E106564A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:19:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414438FC08 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyh15 with SMTP id 15so4313639wyh.13 for ; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:19:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZkO5u1R9xYt7xBIIQR/WWM732+jJrsjB35+zwi02mvw=; b=ur4QhTUyQ9so9RIBPMfptDzMF6YqhM/zBrHsiQsHmPWunDjnZK6gAOv1jk6t9Jw8N9 z45dvM68VAnL127AZ1w04fOSre6aNaactWWqOO17LKiBfRpxw3BOZ6PiEzlJ/Gd1PEOc blb6qBodpfvOH0bj6n17aIIp6BptxRIxn8kNE= Received: by 10.227.39.24 with SMTP id d24mr3165623wbe.65.1315174777396; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ev5sm6218220wbb.11.2011.09.04.15.19.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:19:28 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110904231928.1e624e1b@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <201109041801.MAA04495@lariat.net> References: <201109041801.MAA04495@lariat.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Cutting sendmail out of the loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:19:38 -0000 On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:01:03 -0600 Brett Glass wrote: > I'd like to see if I can set up > local delivery of mail without invoking the memory- and cpu-hungry > program that is sendmail. I have the default settings and have 2 sendmail process with 3MB of resident memory each, and I've never noticed a significant amount of CPU time used. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 22:55:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116B51065674 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D398FC0A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyh15 with SMTP id 15so4324003wyh.13 for ; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:55:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3+YILwKkLwt9ZZWftnkBZVzOn8crr78M2Hy0clBh9vU=; b=KkljKvoQokiZEk4heC71wwusxyXi4hD20S+o09rgJRCi8gq7oK1aPoe84IO2VDGKCV bmFYgvC5C5BJYzmtR0UibDnKEKP76ZdqHXehxBT6YlF1Si9+ZF/U4K8DYDRhgA0zGLPg dQ5qj6aCBH0g5h4GbHasuYfGZOC7ygcO2UKrE= Received: by 10.227.72.200 with SMTP id n8mr3268227wbj.19.1315176936436; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fp17sm6296886wbb.6.2011.09.04.15.55.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:55:25 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110904235525.5ecec986@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <201109041801.MAA04495@lariat.net> <4E63E11C.4040408@gmail.com> <201109042144.PAA05877@lariat.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Cutting sendmail out of the loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:55:38 -0000 On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:08:11 -0700 Michael Sierchio wrote: > I might suggest installing qmail, and running qmail-send only. This > involves moving /usr/sbin/sendmail out of the way, and > > ln -s /var/qmail/bin/sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail > > which satisfies every invocation of sendmail I've seen. YMMV. > See mailer.conf(5) and mailwrapper(8) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 22:58:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91E01065670 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:58:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward10.mail.yandex.net (forward10.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:202::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16FE8FC0C for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp7.mail.yandex.net (smtp7.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.55]) by forward10.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 47CD51021589; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 02:58:49 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1315177129; bh=AQsP8UxyZz/jrXvFWE138cNGmoAClEvJBlnmzhVmyGY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Wz5NkyHPWu7/jUwA7CUtg659LMSbH/YucJdveTbaeFiacsGCb8Dw5c6XM0yUMOWgq uppWqj/+zXveJ/b/qg6PxhfQc1zPkH8fAVVJGJgvEJitn2cayb/lUNveSn6OVHGSj8 RRn5IPEsxwAehLlh6pJ+Eb3Yi5BGtuTur5Qnn/Ig= Received: from smtp7.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp7.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 29EC615803AE; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 02:58:49 +0400 (MSD) Received: from 46-185-28-188-mltp.broadband.kyivstar.net (46-185-28-188-mltp.broadband.kyivstar.net [46.185.28.188]) by smtp7.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id wmt8Wq6n; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 02:58:48 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 01:58:48 +0300 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <279795679.20110905015848@yandex.ru> To: Marco Beishuizen In-Reply-To: References: <4E5E8A93.1010006@sentex.net> <123778406.20110901225021@yandex.ru> <638737527.20110902093153@yandex.ru> <523859952.20110903211416@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa Subject: Re[5]: vpn using pptpclient in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:58:51 -0000 Çäðàâñòâóéòå, Marco. Âû ïèñàëè 3 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2011 ã., 21:55:37: MB> On Sat, 3 Sep 2011, the wise Êîíüêîâ Åâãåíèé wrote: >> Please describe your networks fully >> >> also I ask to send output of: >> ifconfig >> netstat -nr MB> My computer has IP 192.168.1.11, and sits behind a ADSL router which has MB> IP 192.168.1.1, the router is the gateway to the internet. IP adresses are MB> assigned by DHCP. The vpn network of the university I would like to MB> connect to has the adress vpn-eur-pptp.eur.nl. The IP range of the MB> university is 130.115.x.x. MB> My ifconfig and netstat when mpd5 is not running: MB> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 MB> options=209b MB> ether 00:0e:0c:3d:e1:6d MB> inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fe3d:e16d%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 MB> inet 192.168.1.11 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 MB> nd6 options=3 MB> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) MB> status: active MB> fwe0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 MB> options=8 MB> ether 02:02:3c:06:08:57 MB> ch 1 dma -1 MB> fwip0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 MB> lladdr 0.2.3c.1.1.6.8.57.a.2.ff.fe.0.0.0.0 MB> lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 MB> options=3 MB> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 MB> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 MB> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 MB> nd6 options=3 MB> Internet: MB> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire MB> default 192.168.1.1 UGS 0 59590 em0 MB> 127.0.0.1 link#7 UH 0 354 lo0 MB> 192.168.1.0/24 link#4 U 0 92 em0 MB> 192.168.1.11 link#4 UHS 0 0 lo0 MB> My ifconfig and netstat when mpd5 is running: MB> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 MB> options=209b MB> ether 00:0e:0c:3d:e1:6d MB> inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fe3d:e16d%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 MB> inet 192.168.1.11 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 MB> nd6 options=3 MB> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) MB> status: active MB> fwe0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 MB> options=8 MB> ether 02:02:3c:06:08:57 MB> ch 1 dma -1 MB> fwip0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 MB> lladdr 0.2.3c.1.1.6.8.57.a.2.ff.fe.0.0.0.0 MB> lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 MB> options=3 MB> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 MB> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 MB> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 MB> nd6 options=3 MB> ng0: flags=88d1 metric 0 MB> mtu 1456 MB> inet 130.115.77.12 --> 130.115.3.34 netmask 0xffffffff MB> inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fe3d:e16d%ng0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 MB> nd6 options=3 MB> Internet: MB> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire MB> default 192.168.1.1 UGS 0 59807 em0 MB> 127.0.0.1 link#7 UH 0 354 lo0 MB> 130.115.0.0/16 130.115.3.34 UGS 0 0 ng0 MB> 130.115.3.34 link#8 UH 0 4 ng0 MB> 130.115.77.12 link#8 UHS 0 0 lo0 MB> 192.168.1.0/24 link#4 U 0 92 em0 MB> 192.168.1.11 link#4 UHS 0 0 lo0 MB> Hope this clears things up. MB> Regards, MB> Marco As I have so, you 1. Successfully connect to university MB> ng0: flags=88d1 metric 0 MB> mtu 1456 MB> inet 130.115.77.12 --> 130.115.3.34 netmask 0xffffffff MB> inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fe3d:e16d%ng0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 MB> nd6 options=3 2. You also have route to it MB> 130.115.0.0/16 130.115.3.34 UGS 0 0 ng0 so you are done, are not? -- Ñ óâàæåíèåì, Êîíüêîâ mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 23:10:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE191065672 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8D58FC1D for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan (a80-101-78-208.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.78.208]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p84N9UWa095411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 01:09:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from yokozuna.lan (yokozuna.lan [IPv6:::1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p84N9Uqt016135; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 01:09:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 01:09:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Beishuizen To: =?KOI8-R?B?68/O2MvP1yDl18fFzsnK?= In-Reply-To: <279795679.20110905015848@yandex.ru> Message-ID: References: <4E5E8A93.1010006@sentex.net> <123778406.20110901225021@yandex.ru> <638737527.20110902093153@yandex.ru> <523859952.20110903211416@yandex.ru> <279795679.20110905015848@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="394277907-1947549756-1315177770=:3048" X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa Subject: Re[5]: vpn using pptpclient in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:10:03 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --394277907-1947549756-1315177770=:3048 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, the wise =CA=EE=ED=FC=EA=EE=E2 =C5=E2=E3=E5=ED=E8=E9 wr= ote: > As I have so, you > 1. Successfully connect to university > MB> ng0: flags=3D88d1 met= ric 0 > MB> mtu 1456 > MB> inet 130.115.77.12 --> 130.115.3.34 netmask 0xffffffff > MB> inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fe3d:e16d%ng0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 > MB> nd6 options=3D3 > > 2. You also have route to it > MB> 130.115.0.0/16 130.115.3.34 UGS 0 0 ng0 > > so you are done, are not? Unfortunately not, because it looks like I have a connection, but in fact= =20 I cannot log in to the university through the tunnel. With the above=20 settings and running mpd, the university site is not pingable and=20 unreachable by a browser. Marco --=20 Volcanoes have a grandeur that is grim And earthquakes only terrify the dolts, And to him who's scientific There is nothing that's terrific In the pattern of a flight of thunderbolts! =09=09-- W. S. Gilbert, "The Mikado" --394277907-1947549756-1315177770=:3048-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 23:38:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEA41065670 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2588FC0C for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadx2 with SMTP id x2so7390901iad.13 for ; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:38:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.29.136 with SMTP id r8mr2830352icc.286.1315179508756; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.131.67 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:38:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110904235525.5ecec986@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <201109041801.MAA04495@lariat.net> <4E63E11C.4040408@gmail.com> <201109042144.PAA05877@lariat.net> <20110904235525.5ecec986@gumby.homeunix.com> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:38:28 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: RW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cutting sendmail out of the loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:38:30 -0000 Doesn't work in practice, since there are programs that don't honor this and invoke sendmail directly. On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:55 PM, RW wrote: > On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:08:11 -0700 > Michael Sierchio wrote: > >> I might suggest installing qmail, and running qmail-send only. =A0This >> involves moving /usr/sbin/sendmail out of the way, and >> >> ln -s /var/qmail/bin/sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail >> >> which satisfies every invocation of sendmail I've seen. =A0YMMV. >> > > See mailer.conf(5) and mailwrapper(8) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 00:39:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B8E106566C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907758FC0A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyh15 with SMTP id 15so4354794wyh.13 for ; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:39:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z0yHg0Ln1UX+hPnXvFXHzWUAkbicLZMXHd44LMFI6uA=; b=H4mxyhQzCAS8n5hCP+xStJsITCk9xzs4ZHTWV/7lRYaKtKD0U7hvXPWREbohV8f0qE Ypsa0q5L0f3DsuJFCwrP/m8vnX1UlthWQ8GGPIgvjrm7AKqjG+tgpv7wYDkMUk8BVYOK IGvrkK7f1YRhWKCUWcEecHGYuLpEI3P77tKfs= Received: by 10.227.208.17 with SMTP id ga17mr35516wbb.84.1315183157368; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fq2sm6448508wbb.24.2011.09.04.17.39.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:39:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 01:39:07 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110905013907.5439ce30@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <201109041801.MAA04495@lariat.net> <4E63E11C.4040408@gmail.com> <201109042144.PAA05877@lariat.net> <20110904235525.5ecec986@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Cutting sendmail out of the loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:39:19 -0000 On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:38:28 -0700 Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > > See mailer.conf(5) and mailwrapper(8) > > > Doesn't work in practice, since there are programs that don't honor > this and invoke sendmail directly. They're supposed to, /usr/sbin/sendmail is a symlink to mailwrapper. The real sendmail is at /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 01:11:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6EF1065670 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 01:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC068FC12 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 01:11:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WildRover.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA07025; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 19:11:30 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201109050111.TAA07025@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:11:30 -0600 To: Robert Bonomi From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <201109042333.p84NXkiK002887@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201109041814.MAA04568@lariat.net> <201109042333.p84NXkiK002887@mail.r-bonomi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Huge interrupt overhead reported after RAM added to Atom-based system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 01:11:46 -0000 At 05:33 PM 9/4/2011, Robert Bonomi wrote: >Does sound sorta-like VM thrashing. > >Could it be hardware based _bank-switching_ on memory? > >This would cause an intterrupt every time successive memory accesses were in >differnt 'banks'. Indeed. In fact, when you put in a 4GB module, the BIOS reports that you have 1GB of "4GB+ memory" (a possible indication that the last gigabyte is mapped into some special space). Maybe there's something like PAE going on. Anyone know what might be up? (Copying this message back to the list thread) --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 04:04:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1159B106566C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 04:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@pldrouin.net) Received: from ran.physics.carleton.ca (ran.physics.carleton.ca [134.117.14.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5188FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 04:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (CPE0023695b905f-CM001a666aca96.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.245.231.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ran.physics.carleton.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CEC39F8A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:47:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:47:03 -0400 From: Pierre-Luc Drouin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 04:04:35 -0000 Hi, so I have a friend who is looking for the best OS for a web server, that allows to configure services (I guess HTTP, PHP, MySQL and web content) and do the OS maintenance (OS & package updates, firewall configuration) without having to touch a shell. I was wondering if something like PC-BSD + CPanel would be the way to go. Would there be other BSD-based alternatives? I always do upgrades and configure services through the shell and I am not aware too much about the GUI alternatives... Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 05:55:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94168106564A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 05:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave-lists-freebsd-questions@weller-fahy.com) Received: from tigger.weller-fahy.com (sinecure.xen.prgmr.com [64.71.167.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7218FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 05:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2802 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2011 22:42:55 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO weller-fahy.com) (dave@weller-fahy.com@24.209.97.191) by tigger.weller-fahy.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 4 Sep 2011 22:42:55 -0700 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 01:29:03 -0400 From: "David J. Weller-Fahy" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110905052902.GB4255@weller-fahy.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+46 (b01d63af6fea) (2011-07-01) Subject: Accounting "disabled/enabled" messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 05:55:48 -0000 --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I noticed today the following entries in my dmesg. #v+ Accounting enabled Accounting disabled Accounting enabled Accounting disabled Accounting enabled Accounting disabled Accounting enabled #v- The uname -a follows. FreeBSD NAStie 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #0: Thu Jul 28 16:34:16 UTC 2011= root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 I tracked the actual messages down to /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_acct.c, but am not familiar enough with kernel internals to figure out why its happening. It *looks* like its happening every time I reboot the system (been playing around with the power). However, I want to be sure, and figured I'd check with the list. So - are these messages something to be concerned about? Or something to ignore? Or something to ignore in a BETA environment, and not in a production environment? Regards, --=20 dave [ please don't CC me ] --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk5kXh0ACgkQzahokXOb2UwRXgCfQ3GvcAvldLk9toQk7Zr9LECk lLcAn2V60srEmfRMFqUTz1KQVdBLewBa =KtbZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 07:10:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2623106564A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 07:10:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CF78FC12 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 07:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p857APZf046702 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 02:10:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p857AOYN071060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 02:10:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p857AOW1071059 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 02:10:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 02:10:24 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110905071024.GB9801@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20110905052902.GB4255@weller-fahy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110905052902.GB4255@weller-fahy.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (email2.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Mon, 05 Sep 2011 02:10:25 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 199.67.51.78 Subject: Re: Accounting "disabled/enabled" messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 07:10:28 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 05), David J. Weller-Fahy said: > I noticed today the following entries in my dmesg. > > #v+ > Accounting enabled > Accounting disabled > Accounting enabled > Accounting disabled > Accounting enabled > Accounting disabled > Accounting enabled > #v- > > The uname -a follows. > > FreeBSD NAStie 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #0: Thu Jul 28 16:34:16 UTC 2011 root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > I tracked the actual messages down to /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_acct.c, but > am not familiar enough with kernel internals to figure out why its > happening. It *looks* like its happening every time I reboot the system > (been playing around with the power). However, I want to be sure, and > figured I'd check with the list. > > So - are these messages something to be concerned about? Or something > to ignore? Or something to ignore in a BETA environment, and not in a > production environment? Assuming you have accounting enabled in /etc/rc.conf, that's to be expected. Accounting is enabled on boot, disabled on shutdown, and cycled twice during /var/account/acct rotation at 3am. See /etc/rc.d/accounting and /etc/periodic/daily/310.accounting . -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 08:59:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AE71065674 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:59:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52538FC14 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id p858wtY4007045 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 03:58:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 03:58:55 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201109050858.p858wtY4007045@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <201109042144.PAA05877@lariat.net> Subject: Re: Cutting sendmail out of the loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 08:59:36 -0000 > Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:44:45 -0600 > From: Brett Glass > Subject: Re: Cutting sendmail out of the loop > > Johan: > > Actually, since the system I'm building is meant to be very secure and > appliance-like, it doesn't ever need to get mail "out of the system." And > it has limited memory, so it shouldn't be running a mail daemon. At most, > it needs a mail system that can ONLY mail locally, solely for the purpose > of satisfying programs that want to send users status via mail. (The mail > files will be trimmed by newsyslog, so they can't consume infinite > space.) Even the Dragonfly mail daemon would be overkill. How about a simple _shell_script_ that simply finds the addressee in the command-line parameters, and appends the content from stdin to that addressee's mailbox? If you want to get fancy, you add calls to lockfile to prevent potentially intermixed output. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 10:01:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C58B1065672 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724EF8FC15 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:01:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp14.mail.yandex.net (smtp14.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.192]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 07661C21387; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:01:11 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1315216871; bh=rPVDM8VM90p0vF3o54TA1s9oV+PJ0TDsZIXCoMZmRSM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AQAwy6sisi+q6XEJX9pHHH6YNyvemrVsJ+Kx0Lo6T1BU8RlQ+SmkdpbOU6o/I8DcN emYp7j+hPINBAIiaERrSYD5R/kOrI9pfWtNaAwnIu6ZTiA+j1vVo+1J5qYXUlCU6NW 9QjPgCVnfIvq7Mc5c2B7KSANLeMz7OY9eDLfnK0g= Received: from smtp14.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp14.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DDB6A1B60214; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:01:10 +0400 (MSD) Received: from 46-185-28-188-mltp.broadband.kyivstar.net (46-185-28-188-mltp.broadband.kyivstar.net [46.185.28.188]) by smtp14.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 1AUKahfU; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:01:10 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:01:10 +0300 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <7010256522.20110905130110@yandex.ru> To: Marco Beishuizen In-Reply-To: References: <4E5E8A93.1010006@sentex.net> <123778406.20110901225021@yandex.ru> <638737527.20110902093153@yandex.ru> <523859952.20110903211416@yandex.ru> <279795679.20110905015848@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa Subject: Re[6]: vpn using pptpclient in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:01:14 -0000 Çäðàâñòâóéòå, Marco. Âû ïèñàëè 5 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2011 ã., 2:09:30: MB> On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, the wise Êîíüêîâ Åâãåíèé wrote: >> As I have so, you >> 1. Successfully connect to university >> MB> ng0: flags=88d1 metric 0 >> MB> mtu 1456 >> MB> inet 130.115.77.12 --> 130.115.3.34 netmask 0xffffffff >> MB> inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fe3d:e16d%ng0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 >> MB> nd6 options=3 >> >> 2. You also have route to it >> MB> 130.115.0.0/16 130.115.3.34 UGS 0 0 ng0 >> >> so you are done, are not? MB> Unfortunately not, because it looks like I have a connection, but in fact MB> I cannot log in to the university through the tunnel. With the above MB> settings and running mpd, the university site is not pingable and MB> unreachable by a browser. may be you have a problem with firewall. try #traceroute -- Ñ óâàæåíèåì, Êîíüêîâ mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 12:31:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D21106564A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54ED58FC0C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969013D018; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:31:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p85CV26V001870; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:31:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:31:02 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Pierre-Luc Drouin Message-Id: <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 12:31:06 -0000 On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:47:03 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: > Hi, > > so I have a friend who is looking for the best OS for a web server, that > allows to configure services (I guess HTTP, PHP, MySQL and web content) > and do the OS maintenance (OS & package updates, firewall configuration) > without having to touch a shell. I was wondering if something like > PC-BSD + CPanel would be the way to go. Would there be other BSD-based > alternatives? I always do upgrades and configure services through the > shell and I am not aware too much about the GUI alternatives... There are webbased configuration tools that run on common service combinations (like Apache + MySQL + PHP) that can be installed. However _installing_ them requires a skilled person who is able to administrate a server, which in turn traditionally implies the ability to use the command line, even if it's just for that "abstraction job". FreeBSD can be the OS running such a combination. PC-BSD primarily aims at desktop usage, so for example it defaults to KDE, office applications, multimedia stuff and all the things you traditionally won't want on a server. Software solutions that come to mind are CPanel or WebMin. Maybe there are others? I'm not sure as I void those mostly inflexible, error-prone, overcomplicated and dangerous piles of bloat whenever possible. :-) For managing installed applications (ports), there are KDE tools for that (at least _have been_ in the past, not sure if they are still being maintained). The system cannot be updated by a GUI tool (why should it?), but it should be a job of max. 30 minutes to create a Tcl/Tk GUI wrapper for those things. And firewall configuration: I'm quite sure PC-BSD has something for that, except that it probably won't give you the flexibility to automatically change firewall rules depending on different kinds of attacks the server will encounter. Please keep in mind: If you're running a web server, you're part of the target group of thousands of "villains" across the Internet who will happily exploit any weakness you are presenting to them, depending on the services and software you run. What's possible to run will also depend on what kind of server you have. For example if you run a server without any GPU, but PC-BSD depends on hardware-accellerated 3D graphics for managing the firewall, then... you know. :-) There still is a question that your friend should give an answer to himself: Wouldn't it be worth investing in basic UNIX skills and command line operations to gain knowledge and experience to professionally administer a server instead of relying on abstracted layers of abstracted abstractions that GUIs provide here, maybe paying with speed and security loss? It's like driving a car; you _can_ pay a driver to drive your car all the time, but maybe you should consider to learn how to drive yourself. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 12:27:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AC41065674 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net (relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net [212.159.7.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A657E8FC13 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:27:02 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvUGANK/ZE5UXeb0/2dsb2JhbABCihmOfoEpjVd4gUEBBQEFCAEBTQEsAgMFAiUlFAEEGiQGGwIBAgMBh1wIuSkOhXxgBIc8kQGLfw Received: from outmx03.plus.net ([84.93.230.244]) by relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2011 13:26:42 +0100 Received: from [212.159.115.167] (helo=admin) by outmx03.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1R0YGA-0005yH-1T for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:26:42 +0100 Message-ID: <45FC473B20A540FB8BC59D14A35989D2@admin> From: "Graham Bentley" To: References: <20110905120034.969251065832@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:26:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 12:44:54 +0000 Subject: Re-create MBR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 12:27:03 -0000 Hi All, I had to install Linux to participate in a project I was involved with. Now is all finished I have restored the partition but now need a 3bsd boot sector back. Scheme is ; 0 Primary XP 0 Extended FAT32 1 Primary FreeBSD Approx 1/3 disc for each. How can I restore the 3bsd boot sector? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 13:13:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C130D106566B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@brightstar.bomgardner.net) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (brightstar.bomgardner.net [209.240.79.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F268FC14 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brightstar.bomgardner.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58D7216 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:13:52 -0500 (CDT) From: "Gene" To: "Freebsd Questions" Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:13:52 -0500 Message-Id: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.53 X-OriginatingIP: 127.0.0.1 (fbsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Subject: Help Finding ZFS snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:13:43 -0000 Hi All: Using FreeBSD 8.1, amd64 - I wanted to recover files from a snapshot of usr/home. Everything I've found via googling refers to a link such as "path/zfs/.snapshot" However, I'll be darned if I can find any such link. Snapshots existing are: NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zroot/usr@2011-01-02 1.06G - 10.2G - zroot/usr/home@2011-07-09 419M - 11.9G - zroot/usr/ports@2011-01-02 720M - 723M - zroot/usr/ports/distfiles@2011-01-02 310K - 2.72G - zroot/usr/ports/packages@2011-01-02 20.0K - 24.0K - zroot/usr/src@2011-01-02 159M - 310M - And ZFS is version 3: This system is currently running ZFS filesystem version 3. All filesystems are formatted with the current version. === Either 1) I'm looking in all the wrong places, 2) the link was somehow deleted, 3) ZFS has changed TWTAD (the way things are done). Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks. -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 13:18:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA3A1065670 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@pldrouin.net) Received: from ran.physics.carleton.ca (ran.physics.carleton.ca [134.117.14.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B828F8FC17 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (CPE0023695b905f-CM001a666aca96.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.245.231.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ran.physics.carleton.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6854139F95; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:18:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:18:21 -0400 From: Pierre-Luc Drouin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:18:26 -0000 On 09/05/2011 08:31 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:47:03 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> so I have a friend who is looking for the best OS for a web server, that >> allows to configure services (I guess HTTP, PHP, MySQL and web content) >> and do the OS maintenance (OS& package updates, firewall configuration) >> without having to touch a shell. I was wondering if something like >> PC-BSD + CPanel would be the way to go. Would there be other BSD-based >> alternatives? I always do upgrades and configure services through the >> shell and I am not aware too much about the GUI alternatives... > There are webbased configuration tools that run on common > service combinations (like Apache + MySQL + PHP) that can > be installed. However _installing_ them requires a skilled > person who is able to administrate a server, which in turn > traditionally implies the ability to use the command line, > even if it's just for that "abstraction job". Well, this part is not an issue, as he will not be the one doing the initial install of the system > FreeBSD can be the OS running such a combination. > > PC-BSD primarily aims at desktop usage, so for example it > defaults to KDE, office applications, multimedia stuff and > all the things you traditionally won't want on a server. But all these can be removed quite easily I guess... > Software solutions that come to mind are CPanel or WebMin. > Maybe there are others? I'm not sure as I void those mostly > inflexible, error-prone, overcomplicated and dangerous > piles of bloat whenever possible. :-) How much security risk do these represent compared to using a Windows server? > For managing installed applications (ports), there are > KDE tools for that (at least _have been_ in the past, > not sure if they are still being maintained). Do the PC-BSD package management tools still require KDE? I though they were removing this dependency? > The system > cannot be updated by a GUI tool (why should it?), but > it should be a job of max. 30 minutes to create a Tcl/Tk > GUI wrapper for those things. Can PC-BSD OS be updated through a gui? > And firewall configuration: > I'm quite sure PC-BSD has something for that, except that > it probably won't give you the flexibility to automatically > change firewall rules depending on different kinds of > attacks the server will encounter. > > Please keep in mind: If you're running a web server, you're > part of the target group of thousands of "villains" across > the Internet who will happily exploit any weakness you are > presenting to them, depending on the services and software > you run. > > What's possible to run will also depend on what kind of > server you have. For example if you run a server without > any GPU, but PC-BSD depends on hardware-accellerated 3D > graphics for managing the firewall, then... you know. :-) > > There still is a question that your friend should give an > answer to himself: Wouldn't it be worth investing in basic > UNIX skills and command line operations to gain knowledge > and experience to professionally administer a server instead > of relying on abstracted layers of abstracted abstractions > that GUIs provide here, maybe paying with speed and security > loss? Well, I know that. I can try convincing him... Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 13:22:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A10106564A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09BC8FC17 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan (a80-101-78-208.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.78.208]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p85DLZe2058359 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:21:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from yokozuna.lan (yokozuna.lan [IPv6:::1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p85DLY6m005336; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:21:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:21:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Beishuizen To: =?KOI8-R?B?68/O2MvP1yDl18fFzsnK?= In-Reply-To: <7010256522.20110905130110@yandex.ru> Message-ID: References: <4E5E8A93.1010006@sentex.net> <123778406.20110901225021@yandex.ru> <638737527.20110902093153@yandex.ru> <523859952.20110903211416@yandex.ru> <279795679.20110905015848@yandex.ru> <7010256522.20110905130110@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="394277907-314311441-1315228894=:3096" X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa Subject: Re[6]: vpn using pptpclient in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:22:08 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --394277907-314311441-1315228894=:3096 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, the wise =CA=EE=ED=FC=EA=EE=E2 =C5=E2=E3=E5=ED=E8=E9 wr= ote: > may be you have a problem with firewall. > try > #traceroute Traceroute gives: =2E.. traceroute vpn-eur-pptp.eur.nl traceroute: Warning: vpn-eur-pptp.eur.nl has multiple addresses; using=20 130.115.3.35 traceroute to vpn-eur-pptp.eur.nl (130.115.3.35), 64 hops max, 40 byte=20 packets 1 * * * 2 * * * 3 * * * 4 * * * 5 * * * =2E.. May I also add that I also have a laptop behind the ADSL router=20 running windows that has no problems at all with the vpn connection. That= =20 is why I think the problem is with FreeBSD or the vpn software. Marco --=20 If there really was a Jewish conspiracy to run the world, my rabbi would have let me in on it by now. I contribute enough to the shule. =09=09-- Saul Goodman --394277907-314311441-1315228894=:3096-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 13:23:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75083106567A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49D48FC19 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from russet.local (reflex.squiz.co.uk [83.217.109.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p85DMtGM049276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:23:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p85DMtGM049276 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315228983; bh=cXHZki0yMfsDsVx4WVxCxS+yO98UPQ2OLybtlWgqBKY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E64CD25.2070401@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20M on,=2005=20Sep=202011=2014:22:45=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.1)=20Gecko/2 0110830=20Thunderbird/6.0.1|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20freebsd-ques tions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Help=20Finding=20ZFS=20snapshot s|References:=20<20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net>| In-Reply-To:=20<20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net>|X -Enigmail-Version:=201.3.1|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20m icalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature" =3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig79B60740FDFADD4B3176697B"; b=pCz2fGUaatPwPqp5Yg09f0I9Eh8aHbNeefY8Y5JxpIyHHs5CVIjwaYe2D7DmYEbVV /5pnSs4YPQU36crvEhyj4lNLQK2OvAsKO23oJHEITJOKDfieLQQfKpuzKuNyqqzryD JjlhnRg8tBzlmvpWR/j637QCBj361ki8NuQC4aZ4= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host reflex.squiz.co.uk [83.217.109.164] claimed to be russet.local Message-ID: <4E64CD25.2070401@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:22:45 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> In-Reply-To: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig79B60740FDFADD4B3176697B" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Help Finding ZFS snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:23:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig79B60740FDFADD4B3176697B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/09/2011 14:13, Gene wrote: > Either 1) I'm looking in all the wrong places, 2) the link was somehow > deleted, 3) ZFS has changed TWTAD (the way things are done). >=20 > Can anyone point me in the right direction? >=20 ZFS snapshots automount themselves when you cd to the snapshot directory.= Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig79B60740FDFADD4B3176697B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5kzS0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwURgCgh4wsWRZNagEmKXYBziOYau44 x78AnAzvzVKumLMzqlaw60SIIJlCqNyk =OrCp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig79B60740FDFADD4B3176697B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 13:44:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8C81065674 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:44:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1C78FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DB63D1B2; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:43:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p85Dhwtq002066; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:43:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:43:58 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Pierre-Luc Drouin Message-Id: <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:44:00 -0000 On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:18:21 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: > On 09/05/2011 08:31 AM, Polytropon wrote: > > On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:47:03 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> so I have a friend who is looking for the best OS for a web server, that > >> allows to configure services (I guess HTTP, PHP, MySQL and web content) > >> and do the OS maintenance (OS& package updates, firewall configuration) > >> without having to touch a shell. I was wondering if something like > >> PC-BSD + CPanel would be the way to go. Would there be other BSD-based > >> alternatives? I always do upgrades and configure services through the > >> shell and I am not aware too much about the GUI alternatives... > > There are webbased configuration tools that run on common > > service combinations (like Apache + MySQL + PHP) that can > > be installed. However _installing_ them requires a skilled > > person who is able to administrate a server, which in turn > > traditionally implies the ability to use the command line, > > even if it's just for that "abstraction job". > > Well, this part is not an issue, as he will not be the one doing the > initial install of the system Okay, in this case FreeBSD can provide an excellent OS for that purpose. > > PC-BSD primarily aims at desktop usage, so for example it > > defaults to KDE, office applications, multimedia stuff and > > all the things you traditionally won't want on a server. > > But all these can be removed quite easily I guess... I'm not sure about that as those are essential parts of that FreeBSD derivate. It's like you would say to intend to strip all GUI components from "Windows"... :-) However, I think it would be much easier to start with a FreeBSD install and then add those tools you want. I assume this will consume less time (and will be less complicated as you're not about to break something unintendedly). > > Software solutions that come to mind are CPanel or WebMin. > > Maybe there are others? I'm not sure as I void those mostly > > inflexible, error-prone, overcomplicated and dangerous > > piles of bloat whenever possible. :-) > How much security risk do these represent compared to using a Windows > server? What's a "'Windows' server"? Really, I've not come to the conclusion that "Windows" is to be used on _any_ servers, and as I'm not a "Windows" person, I'm the wrong one to ask for details here. >From my own experiences in dealing with the _problems_ "Windows" servers traditionally impose on a network (consisting of UNIX and Linux primarily) that those who have to administer those "Windows" boxes are either in constant trouble (fixing things here and there, rebooting), or just don't care (which often turns their systems into targets for spammers, botnets and all the other unwanted stuff that increases your costs). The main problem of GUI in general is that it _might_ remove control you want, because it basically maps just a subset of possibilities to a "point & grunt" interface. A SUBset - this means that you can encounter a case where you need something, but it can't be achieved per GUI interaction. Oh, that's can also be a downside: With GUI, you are tied to interactive management. You cannot script a GUI thing, you can't automate things. You have to do them yourself, in a linear way. Depending on _what_ you want to do, this should be considered in making an educated choice. > > For managing installed applications (ports), there are > > KDE tools for that (at least _have been_ in the past, > > not sure if they are still being maintained). > Do the PC-BSD package management tools still require KDE? I though they > were removing this dependency? I also thought there would be a tool to manage PBIs from the command line. However, you're free to use the standard FreeBSD installation methods on FreeBSD, which are: binary packages (pkg_add -r), ports subsystem and ports management (like portmaster, portmanager, portupgrade). > > The system > > cannot be updated by a GUI tool (why should it?), but > > it should be a job of max. 30 minutes to create a Tcl/Tk > > GUI wrapper for those things. > > Can PC-BSD OS be updated through a gui? Yes. They do updating per PBI, i. e. you download something using a web browser (ouch!) and then "push da button". In some regards, this is comparable to how Linux manages the "system" (as it makes no difference between "the operating system" and "installed 3rd party software", as _all_ of them are packages, managed by the system's package installer tool). Furthermore I assume there will be an automated notification. So if you chosse to run PC-BSD, you encounter a typical strength of FreeBSD (as a multi-functional OS): You end up with a desktop system that exposes server functionality (in your case: web server with PHP and MySQL), and that's a completely valid approach, even though it _might_ cause problems later on, as depending on GUI tools can lead you to a point where functionality you need is dropped from the "GUI abstraction layer" and you _have to_ deal with the CLI in order to keep things running. But time will tell you if this will happen, and how. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 13:48:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE3F106566B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@brightstar.bomgardner.net) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (brightstar.bomgardner.net [209.240.79.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509008FC18 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:48:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brightstar.bomgardner.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B88221 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:48:32 -0500 (CDT) From: "Gene" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:48:32 -0500 Message-Id: <20110905134720.M26059@brightstar.bomgardner.net> In-Reply-To: <4E64CD25.2070401@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> <4E64CD25.2070401@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.53 X-OriginatingIP: 127.0.0.1 (fbsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Subject: Re: Help Finding ZFS snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:48:22 -0000 On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:22:45 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote > On 05/09/2011 14:13, Gene wrote: > > Either 1) I'm looking in all the wrong places, 2) the link was somehow > > deleted, 3) ZFS has changed TWTAD (the way things are done). > > > > Can anyone point me in the right direction? > > > > ZFS snapshots automount themselves when you cd to the snapshot directory. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > The problem is finding the snapshot directory to cd into... -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 13:53:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E6D1065732 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B3D8FC16 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A13A3D05D; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:53:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p85DrRo7002103; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:53:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:53:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Graham Bentley" Message-Id: <20110905155327.c5265ff1.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <45FC473B20A540FB8BC59D14A35989D2@admin> References: <20110905120034.969251065832@hub.freebsd.org> <45FC473B20A540FB8BC59D14A35989D2@admin> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re-create MBR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:53:29 -0000 On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:26:38 +0100, Graham Bentley wrote: > Hi All, > > I had to install Linux to participate in a project I was involved with. > Now is all finished I have restored the partition but now > need a 3bsd boot sector back. Scheme is ; > > 0 Primary XP > 0 Extended FAT32 > 1 Primary FreeBSD > > Approx 1/3 disc for each. How can I restore the 3bsd > boot sector? See "man fdisk". In your case - depending on device names you are currently using - something _like this_ should do the trick: # fdisk -B /dev/ad0s2 I think you can also use the sysinstall Partition screen to update the boot sector (make no change to the slice listing, maybe mark the FreeBSD slice as "active", then exit the screen and choose either "standard MBR" or the "boot manager" depending on your requirements). As I'm not a multi-boot person, I can't be more specific, sorry. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 13:59:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF370106566B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@pldrouin.net) Received: from ran.physics.carleton.ca (ran.physics.carleton.ca [134.117.14.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D7C8FC0C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (CPE0023695b905f-CM001a666aca96.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.245.231.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ran.physics.carleton.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7044239F88; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:59:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E64D5BB.4030509@pldrouin.net> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:59:23 -0400 From: Pierre-Luc Drouin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:59:25 -0000 I just took a look at PBDir and the choice of PBIs for server-related softwares seems to be rather limited. They have a PBI for Apache, but I could not even find one for PHP... To me it seems that if not all the required softwares are available through PBI, it would be better to drop the whole PBI idea all together and fall back to the FreeBSD port/package system. But to go with the FreeBSD route, I will need to convince my friend of using the command line at least to update the packages and the OS. I am not sure if he will enjoy the usage of tools such as mergemaster, given that this requires to have a good idea of what is going on in the config files. This might make an OS like Ubuntu easier to use for my friend, although this is probably not the most stable and secure OS for a server. It might be a necessary compromise in this case though... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 14:08:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAB91065670 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.warl0ck.1989@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BA28FC0A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so14760539pzk.18 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 07:08:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=l2s9vgsTTOWx68zkuus45249U0hs2oolRUYzhXqRHSk=; b=jycF+B2m0Cm4MRetu2nDmD4MkmhJWSARGK7Jb86xlneaci9t3TKw+SFdCzmUEOm/2B h6lvFNnQV1Jo3oQ4RfXPg0k1SjzYMeUQP95MC5pHkz2N6hQAXVOqre3UdUGBNlWQlwhU EyHCy70cUEU5By+2RANEGtb1OLn8+BRyW++tY= Received: by 10.68.20.99 with SMTP id m3mr7992473pbe.444.1315229947105; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 06:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([117.136.9.232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e8sm22174439pbc.8.2011.09.05.06.39.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Sep 2011 06:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:39:07 +0800 From: Aaron Lewis To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20110905133907.GA13289@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: A workable RSS feed for BSDTalk ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:08:39 -0000 Hi, Is there any workable RSS feeds for BSDTalk channel ? Both *.blogspot.com and *.feedburner.com are blocked in my country. -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0xDFE6C29E ( http://pgp.mit.edu/ ) Finger Print: 9482 448F C7C3 896C 1DFE 7DD3 2492 A7D0 DFE6 C29E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 14:14:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569E71065678 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:14:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F423C8FC16 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0381E6FA; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:14:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p85EEHsw002215; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:14:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:14:17 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Pierre-Luc Drouin Message-Id: <20110905161417.44aabcdc.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4E64D5BB.4030509@pldrouin.net> References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64D5BB.4030509@pldrouin.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:14:20 -0000 On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:59:23 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: > I just took a look at PBDir and the choice of PBIs for server-related > softwares seems to be rather limited. Okay, that's understandable, as servers are not their main target. In fact, what do you need a GUI for on a server? - This is a typical question in such a setting, even though it is _possible_ to run a desktop with server functionality. > They have a PBI for Apache, but I > could not even find one for PHP... To me it seems that if not all the > required softwares are available through PBI, it would be better to drop > the whole PBI idea all together and fall back to the FreeBSD > port/package system. Yes, I would agree with that. PBIs are primarily used to distribute desktop-oriented software in a fashion that a web browser is involved in obtaining them (instead of using comfortable tools like pkg_add or portmaster). > But to go with the FreeBSD route, I will need to > convince my friend of using the command line at least to update the > packages and the OS. That's not a problem! You can easily write a short script that performs the required steps. Really, what's so hard about entering "portmaster -a"? I know it's a bit more complicated to update the system (i. e. following the 11 steps in /usr/src/Makefile), but it's also possible to make a Tcl/Tk GUI wrapper for that. In fact, it's even possible to make a desktop icon for a shell script that performs the required steps. Oh, and just in case you do not intend to update from source, why not use freebsd-update? It's _very_ easy to use, and it can also be included in a GUI wrapper. That would be the way I'd suggest: Install desired packages first with portmaster, keep the system up to date using both portmaster (for ports) and freebsd-update for the OS. (Of course you can choose a different port management tool if you like.) > I am not sure if he will enjoy the usage of tools > such as mergemaster, given that this requires to have a good idea of > what is going on in the config files. The person who runs and administers a server is supposed to know what's going on on the system he is responsible for. You may call me old-fashioned for having such an opinion. :-) But as I mentioned above, you can omit mergemaster use if you keep using the -RELEASE-pX OS branch and use the binary method of freebsd-update. It's as simple as "pkg_add -r". > This might make an OS like Ubuntu > easier to use for my friend, although this is probably not the most > stable and secure OS for a server. There _are_ Linux distributions that provide a lot of GUI even for their server systems. I'm not sure which one it was... Red Hat maybe? Or SuSE? Their server and PC systems are designed to be "compatible" (in terms of GUI presented to the user and the administrator). Regarding Ubuntu, it's a quite nice desktop Linux, but I'm not sure how well it does _perform_ (see: performance) on a server. Maybe you can do some research on Linux server operating systems that emphasize an administration GUI? As I said, I think SuSE or Red Hat has something like that. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 14:20:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0412C106564A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:20:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@pldrouin.net) Received: from ran.physics.carleton.ca (ran.physics.carleton.ca [134.117.14.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE208FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (CPE0023695b905f-CM001a666aca96.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.245.231.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ran.physics.carleton.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2280239F95 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:20:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E64DAA6.60006@pldrouin.net> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:20:22 -0400 From: Pierre-Luc Drouin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:20:26 -0000 How well does it work to use binary packages only to maintain a FreeBSD web server in general (I am thinking of package availability, but also and in particular as a quasi-automated updating tool)? I noticed that in the past few years, updating softwares through ports has been requiring more user intervention, due to the way some dependencies are being updated from one version to the next. Would using binary packages allow to avoid more such user intervention? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 14:20:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB112106566C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:20:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave-lists-freebsd-questions@weller-fahy.com) Received: from tigger.weller-fahy.com (sinecure.xen.prgmr.com [64.71.167.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98618FC0C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20167 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2011 07:34:21 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO weller-fahy.com) (dave@weller-fahy.com@24.209.97.191) by tigger.weller-fahy.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 5 Sep 2011 07:34:21 -0700 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:20:28 -0400 From: "David J. Weller-Fahy" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110905142027.GC4255@weller-fahy.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110905052902.GB4255@weller-fahy.com> <20110905071024.GB9801@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110905071024.GB9801@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+46 (b01d63af6fea) (2011-07-01) Subject: Re: Accounting "disabled/enabled" messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:20:32 -0000 --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Dan Nelson [2011-09-05 03:26 -0400]: > Assuming you have accounting enabled in /etc/rc.conf, that's to be > expected. Accounting is enabled on boot, disabled on shutdown, and > cycled twice during /var/account/acct rotation at 3am. See > /etc/rc.d/accounting and /etc/periodic/daily/310.accounting . Thanks! Apparently my digging in the source precluded me from looking in the normal places one would look to find these things out. ;) Appreciate the nudge. Regards, --=20 dave [ please don't CC me ] --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk5k2qsACgkQzahokXOb2Uyh8ACeJUfFXLfV3Vatndhc1TxyShaY jXEAnR2EyryOo9V7sJJss5Sk1wngTdz7 =oOEU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 14:31:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3952106566C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:31:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FB88FC19 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.142] (helo=smtp11.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R0aDB-0005Q7-SY for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:31:45 +0200 Received: from 524944af.cm-4-2b.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([82.73.68.175] helo=mail.nagual.nl) by smtp11.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R0aD6-0004ZZ-Uv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:31:40 +0200 Received: from [10.26.94.201] (62.133.68.21) by yanta (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 3A62D1; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:33:04 +0200 References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> User-Agent: K-9 Mail voor Android In-Reply-To: <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dick Hoogendijk Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:29:18 +0200 To: Pierre-Luc Drouin ,freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-AxigenSpam-Level: 7 X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1R0aD6-0004ZZ-Uv X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (cached, score=0.478, vereist 5, BAYES_00 -1.90, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D 0.67, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, KHOP_DYNAMIC 0.73, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.98) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: dick@nagual.nl X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:31:47 -0000 If you really want. GUI based server, go for a Windows one. It will cost you but security has improved. I would never do it though but I manage my server with shell tools. I love the easiness of textbased config files ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 14:36:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFC61065674 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:36:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0630F8FC18 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847811E70C; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:36:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p85EaNGS002284; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:36:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:36:23 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Pierre-Luc Drouin Message-Id: <20110905163623.98ebca0a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4E64DAA6.60006@pldrouin.net> References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64DAA6.60006@pldrouin.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:36:26 -0000 On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:20:22 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: > How well does it work to use binary packages only to maintain a FreeBSD > web server in general (I am thinking of package availability, but also > and in particular as a quasi-automated updating tool)? Quite well - as long as you're satisfied with the default building options. You know that a binary package is a port, compiled with the default set of options. This is okay in most cases, but there may be situations where you explicitely need to enable or disable a certain feature at compile time. You also may encounter a situation where _no_ package is available for a port (e. g. too many options, or licensing restrictions). This can be solved by portmaster which has an option to go through all interactive configuration screens _before_ starting any action. Those settings can be saved for the next update run. The portmaster program itself can be instructed to _use_ binary packages (just as pkg_add -r would do) with the -P and -PP options. In this case, binary packages will be used as long as possible, and only those ports that require building (as no package exists) will be compiled. See "man portmaster" for details. This is a good approach in combination with freebsd-update. I have used that concept on some servers myself (especially on smaller ones with low resources where compiling would be too problematic). > I noticed that in > the past few years, updating softwares through ports has been requiring > more user intervention, due to the way some dependencies are being > updated from one version to the next. Would using binary packages allow > to avoid more such user intervention? Yes. All dependencies would be incorporated automatically. Only ports without equivalent package that additionally have OPTIONS to set would invoke a configuration screen, and this screen would have to be dealt with only in the first run of the updating process. There are also options for portmaster that can be used to control program behaviour in case of problems (e. g. some package not found, conflicting ports, versioning problem, or port marked "broken"). Those solutions can also easily be scripted, e. g. check one a week for possible updates and get the packages, but do not install them automatically (which can be a security requirement). If the list is approved, the updates will be installed during night, creating a "fallback copy" just in case something went wrong (e. g. malfunctioning new software). Reports can be generated automatically and mailed to the system administrator. I would also suggest to frequently check the mailing lists of the software in use for bugs and security updates that might be interesting in terms of system security. This sould be done for any "major server software" (Apache, PHP, MySQL and the services utilizing those software, whatever you want to run on the server). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 14:43:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECA31065670 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523AE8FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadx2 with SMTP id x2so8359190iad.13 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 07:43:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.82.10 with SMTP id z10mr2969553ibk.77.1315233825616; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 07:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.231.33.10 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 07:43:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:43:45 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9je8R62ZoSGbz1jUT9JGIZVKH4c Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Steven Friedrich Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: [OT] pfSense Book Publisher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:43:46 -0000 On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Steven Friedrich wrote: > Product Details > Thank you! -- Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 14:48:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46998106566B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:48:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DStaal@usa.net) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDFC8FC0A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DAEEBA; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:48:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:48:22 -0400 From: Daniel Staal To: Gene , Freebsd Questions Message-ID: <0FE472B72B858F5A6EF0FD01@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> In-Reply-To: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> References: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Help Finding ZFS snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:48:23 -0000 --As of September 5, 2011 8:13:52 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have said: > Using FreeBSD 8.1, amd64 - I wanted to recover files from a snapshot of > usr/home. Everything I've found via googling refers to a link such as > "path/zfs/.snapshot" --As for the rest, it is mine. Try "path/.zfs". ;) (Which, on my system, then has a 'snapshot' directory, which holds all the snapshots.) Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 14:50:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC550106566B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@pldrouin.net) Received: from ran.physics.carleton.ca (ran.physics.carleton.ca [134.117.14.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03728FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (CPE0023695b905f-CM001a666aca96.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.245.231.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ran.physics.carleton.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F0F39F88; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:50:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E64E1AB.9050607@pldrouin.net> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:50:19 -0400 From: Pierre-Luc Drouin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64DAA6.60006@pldrouin.net> <20110905163623.98ebca0a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110905163623.98ebca0a.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:50:21 -0000 >> I noticed that in >> the past few years, updating softwares through ports has been requiring >> more user intervention, due to the way some dependencies are being >> updated from one version to the next. Would using binary packages allow >> to avoid more such user intervention? > Yes. All dependencies would be incorporated automatically. > Only ports without equivalent package that additionally have > OPTIONS to set would invoke a configuration screen, and this > screen would have to be dealt with only in the first run of > the updating process. > > There are also options for portmaster that can be used to > control program behaviour in case of problems (e. g. some > package not found, conflicting ports, versioning problem, > or port marked "broken"). > So, what I was referring to in particulars was special updates like this: 20110517: AFFECTS: users of lang/perl* AUTHOR: skv@FreeBSD.org lang/perl5.14 is out. If you want to switch to it from, for example lang/perl5.12, that is: Portupgrade users: 0) Fix pkgdb.db (for safety): pkgdb -Ff 1) Reinstall new version of Perl (5.14): env DISABLE_CONFLICTS=1 portupgrade -o lang/perl5.14 -f perl-5.12.\* 2) Reinstall everything that depends on Perl: portupgrade -fr perl So you are saying that this type of special interventions is not necessary when using only binary packages, right? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 14:56:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A410106564A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jherman@dichotomia.fr) Received: from mail.dichotomia.fr (hydrogen.dichotomia.net [91.121.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18C28FC15 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.84] (unknown [178.208.2.9]) (Authenticated sender: kha) by mail.dichotomia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 457A23DD06D for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:53:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E64E30E.9000309@dichotomia.fr> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:56:14 +0200 From: Jerome Herman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> In-Reply-To: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mail.dichotomia.fr); Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:53:06 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:56:46 -0000 Le 05/09/2011 05:47, Pierre-Luc Drouin a écrit : > Hi, > > so I have a friend who is looking for the best OS for a web server, > that allows to configure services (I guess HTTP, PHP, MySQL and web > content) and do the OS maintenance (OS & package updates, firewall > configuration) without having to touch a shell. I was wondering if > something like PC-BSD + CPanel would be the way to go. Would there be > other BSD-based alternatives? I always do upgrades and configure > services through the shell and I am not aware too much about the GUI > alternatives... > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello, If your friend prefer to use a GUI rather than command line interface, why not. But I am a little affraid that is real goal is to avoid reading the documentation, and keeping up to date with good practices and security alerts. Truly it doesn't matter what OS you are using and what use you make of it, when your server is exposed to the internet, you must read the doc and check for security alerts. If it is what your friend is trying to avoid, then I would strongly advise him to subscribe to a fully maintained platform, software as a service, or a mutualized box. Any other option will lead to a disaster. On the other hand, if your friend is willing to accept a bit of shell here and there, and a good deal of doc reading, I would recommand using FreeBSD or Debian as the underlying server (lowest maintenance/usage ratio I know). If you go for FreeBSD I would advise to use this doc http://www.bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/security/harden.php The only easy to configure and to maintain web server I know is Cherokee (http://www.cherokee-project.com/ ). The web admin is quite easy to use, and a lot more intuitive than Apache. Jerome Herman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 15:10:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9789E106566C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:10:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448918FC1B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674591E711; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:10:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p85FApxS002399; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:10:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:10:51 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Pierre-Luc Drouin Message-Id: <20110905171051.601e1484.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4E64E1AB.9050607@pldrouin.net> References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64DAA6.60006@pldrouin.net> <20110905163623.98ebca0a.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64E1AB.9050607@pldrouin.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:10:53 -0000 On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:50:19 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: > > >> I noticed that in > >> the past few years, updating softwares through ports has been requiring > >> more user intervention, due to the way some dependencies are being > >> updated from one version to the next. Would using binary packages allow > >> to avoid more such user intervention? > > Yes. All dependencies would be incorporated automatically. > > Only ports without equivalent package that additionally have > > OPTIONS to set would invoke a configuration screen, and this > > screen would have to be dealt with only in the first run of > > the updating process. > > > > There are also options for portmaster that can be used to > > control program behaviour in case of problems (e. g. some > > package not found, conflicting ports, versioning problem, > > or port marked "broken"). > > > So, what I was referring to in particulars was special updates like this: > 20110517: > AFFECTS: users of lang/perl* > AUTHOR: skv@FreeBSD.org > > lang/perl5.14 is out. If you want to switch to it from, for example > lang/perl5.12, that is: > > Portupgrade users: > 0) Fix pkgdb.db (for safety): > pkgdb -Ff > > 1) Reinstall new version of Perl (5.14): > env DISABLE_CONFLICTS=1 portupgrade -o lang/perl5.14 -f > perl-5.12.\* > > 2) Reinstall everything that depends on Perl: > portupgrade -fr perl > > So you are saying that this type of special interventions is not > necessary when using only binary packages, right? Erm... no, or basically yes. :-) First of all, the example here refers to portupgrade, not to portmaster. The DISABLE_CONFLICTS variable is only required where something is built from source. By using packages, you can even _force_ installation of (maybe conflicting) packages, implying of course that this may cause damage. In _worst_ cases, there's the option to forcedly deinstall packages and then re-install them (in a newer version), this may be useful when the upgrade path is too much trouble. Coming back to that example: If you order portmaster to upgrade perl, you will traditionally also upgrade all ports depending on it. And if this is possible via packages (-P, -PP), it will "reconstruct" the dependencies properly so all programs can use the new perl version. However, as I've turned into a "compile guy" due to sufficient hardware, I usually use source-based updates when needed. I don't update my home system very often, because I'd like to keep it in a functional state. :-) So I've not come across that particular update yet, as I still have perl-threaded-5.10.1_4 installed, and there's nothing here that requires 5.12 or 5.14. When you choose to use portupgrade instead of portmaster, it's a good choice to always run "pkgdb -aF" before and after anything you do (e. g. also "around" a pkg_add -r command). I've been using portupgrade in the past, but today I prefer "just ports" (home) and portmaster (work). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 15:23:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E41106566B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@brightstar.bomgardner.net) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (brightstar.bomgardner.net [209.240.79.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886188FC0C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brightstar.bomgardner.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E8C23E; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:23:32 -0500 (CDT) From: "Gene" To: Daniel Staal , Freebsd Questions Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:23:32 -0500 Message-Id: <20110905152046.M44028@brightstar.bomgardner.net> In-Reply-To: <0FE472B72B858F5A6EF0FD01@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> References: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> <0FE472B72B858F5A6EF0FD01@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.53 X-OriginatingIP: 127.0.0.1 (fbsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Subject: Re: Help Finding ZFS snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:23:22 -0000 On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:48:22 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote > --As of September 5, 2011 8:13:52 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have said: > > > Using FreeBSD 8.1, amd64 - I wanted to recover files from a snapshot of > > usr/home. Everything I've found via googling refers to a link such as > > "path/zfs/.snapshot" > > --As for the rest, it is mine. > > Try "path/.zfs". ;) > > (Which, on my system, then has a 'snapshot' directory, which holds > all the snapshots.) > > Daniel T. Staal > No such luck. The following: cd / ls -R | grep -i "zfs" finds only 'zfs' directories in the source tree and ports. Other ideas? I know the snapshots exist, I can see 'em with "zfs list -t snapshot". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 15:35:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CF81065676 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:35:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DStaal@usa.net) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD968FC15 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F71ED4; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:35:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:35:34 -0400 From: Daniel Staal To: Gene , Freebsd Questions Message-ID: <562EFE312E210988D299516F@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> In-Reply-To: <20110905152046.M44028@brightstar.bomgardner.net> References: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> <0FE472B72B858F5A6EF0FD01@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> <20110905152046.M44028@brightstar.bomgardner.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Help Finding ZFS snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:35:36 -0000 --As of September 5, 2011 10:23:32 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have said: > On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:48:22 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote >> --As of September 5, 2011 8:13:52 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have said: >> >> > Using FreeBSD 8.1, amd64 - I wanted to recover files from a snapshot of >> > usr/home. Everything I've found via googling refers to a link such as >> > "path/zfs/.snapshot" >> >> --As for the rest, it is mine. >> >> Try "path/.zfs". ;) >> >> (Which, on my system, then has a 'snapshot' directory, which holds >> all the snapshots.) >> >> Daniel T. Staal >> > > No such luck. The following: > > cd / > ls -R | grep -i "zfs" > > finds only 'zfs' directories in the source tree and ports. > > Other ideas? I know the snapshots exist, I can see 'em with > "zfs list -t snapshot". --As for the rest, it is mine. Don't check if the directory is there first. It isn't. Just 'cd' to it, and it will exist. Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 15:49:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CC9106566B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joeb1@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806BD8FC0A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:49:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=TekjxiyzSb/SZ4Uj/+gJEbnpmNmSigvGXgu+6KgNduA=; b=goVS9GH7KPWvP+c+152+dk+luaEoId10rJZfS6DJR5adagvaHL/QCgN0ynez7jHEtGrOJhszlNQvOglcc/Obzo96nxnw/Y0JuFSxAs4bBil4U8SB4Zs0HoOUGU0c2t6YRBWzlXemODyA5DUsl+iCVNrysKAB4p/fIYnpPkpewX0= Received: from laptop ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:32:01 -0700 From: "joeb1" To: "Questions@Freebsd. Org" Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:32:05 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6090 Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2011 15:32:01.0685 (UTC) FILETIME=[F528F450:01CC6BE0] X-Sender: joeb1@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: joeb1*a1poweruser.com Cc: Subject: cpio command and schg flags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joeb1@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:49:01 -0000 I am trying to use this code sequence to clone a directory tree. mkdir /usr/test1 cd /var find . | cpio -dmp /usr/test1 The result is /usr/test1 gets populated with the directory tree but all the schg flags get stripped off. How can I keep the schg flags in the cloned directory? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 15:58:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBD41065674 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D519A8FC13 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DA31DEFA; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:58:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p85Fw9bb002678; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:58:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:58:08 +0200 From: Polytropon To: joeb1@a1poweruser.com Message-Id: <20110905175808.6b534002.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Questions@Freebsd. Org" Subject: Re: cpio command and schg flags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:58:11 -0000 On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:32:05 -0400, joeb1 wrote: > I am trying to use this code sequence to clone a directory tree. > mkdir /usr/test1 > cd /var > find . | cpio -dmp /usr/test1 > > The result is /usr/test1 gets populated with the directory tree but > all the schg flags get stripped off. > > How can I keep the schg flags in the cloned directory? As far as I remember, cpio doesn't copy flags. But you can use either dump + restore, or dpdup (from ports). >From "man cpdup": The cpdup utility makes an exact mirror copy of the source in the destination, creating and deleting files and directories as necessary. UTimes, hardlinks, softlinks, devices, permissions, and flags are mirrored. Flags are explicitely mentioned here. Maybe you can give this program a try? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 15:58:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60221065675 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:58:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@brightstar.bomgardner.net) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (brightstar.bomgardner.net [209.240.79.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843E58FC13 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:58:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brightstar.bomgardner.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3B0244; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:58:44 -0500 (CDT) From: "Gene" To: FreeBSD Questions , Freebsd Questions Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:58:44 -0500 Message-Id: <20110905155803.M77497@brightstar.bomgardner.net> In-Reply-To: <562EFE312E210988D299516F@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> References: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> <0FE472B72B858F5A6EF0FD01@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> <20110905152046.M44028@brightstar.bomgardner.net> <562EFE312E210988D299516F@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.53 X-OriginatingIP: 127.0.0.1 (fbsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Subject: Re: Help Finding ZFS snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:58:34 -0000 On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:35:34 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote > --As of September 5, 2011 10:23:32 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have > said: > > > On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:48:22 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote > >> --As of September 5, 2011 8:13:52 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have said: > >> > >> > Using FreeBSD 8.1, amd64 - I wanted to recover files from a snapshot of > >> > usr/home. Everything I've found via googling refers to a link such as > >> > "path/zfs/.snapshot" > >> > >> --As for the rest, it is mine. > >> > >> Try "path/.zfs". ;) > >> > >> (Which, on my system, then has a 'snapshot' directory, which holds > >> all the snapshots.) > >> > >> Daniel T. Staal > >> > > > > No such luck. The following: > > > > cd / > > ls -R | grep -i "zfs" > > > > finds only 'zfs' directories in the source tree and ports. > > > > Other ideas? I know the snapshots exist, I can see 'em with > > "zfs list -t snapshot". > > --As for the rest, it is mine. > > Don't check if the directory is there first. It isn't. Just 'cd' > to it, and it will exist. > > Daniel T. Staal Well I'll be hornswaggled ... Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 15:59:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA201065675 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:59:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862A18FC1F for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id p85FxKMM009306 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201109051559.p85FxKMM009306@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20110905133907.GA13289@localhost> Subject: Re: A workable RSS feed for BSDTalk ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:59:59 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Sep 5 09:08:27 2011 > Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:39:07 +0800 > From: Aaron Lewis > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: A workable RSS feed for BSDTalk ? > > Hi, > Is there any workable RSS feeds for BSDTalk channel ? Eiher of *.blogspot.com and *.feedburner.com work just fine > Both *.blogspot.com and *.feedburner.com are blocked in my country. Oh. you need a feed you can access in ${UNNAMED_COUNTRY}. And, apparently the State of 'Confusion'. Hint: if you don't specify the coutry, nobody has a _hope_ of being able what might be 'not blocked' here. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 16:03:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323D1106564A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:03:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rolnie@bredband.net) Received: from smtprelay-b11.telenor.se (smtprelay-b11.telenor.se [62.127.194.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9E28FC0A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipb3.telenor.se (ipb3.telenor.se [195.54.127.166]) by smtprelay-b11.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DD8EA207 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:32:58 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [85.227.132.203] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqtqAB7rZE5V44TLPGdsb2JhbABDhE2ERp8ECwEBAQE3M4FGAQEFIxUeIgEQCxoCBRYLAgIJAwIBAgEbDAoUBg0BBwEBh3GnHJEcgSyELYERBKQ9 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,334,1312149600"; d="scan'208";a="38392507" Received: from c-cb84e355.09-42-6e6b7010.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO lazlar.kicks-ass.net) ([85.227.132.203]) by ipb3.telenor.se with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2011 17:32:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4E64EBA8.3030208@bredband.net> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:32:56 +0200 From: Rolf Nielsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110729 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gene References: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> <0FE472B72B858F5A6EF0FD01@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> <20110905152046.M44028@brightstar.bomgardner.net> In-Reply-To: <20110905152046.M44028@brightstar.bomgardner.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Freebsd Questions Subject: Re: Help Finding ZFS snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:03:12 -0000 2011-09-05 17:23, Gene skrev: > On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:48:22 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote >> --As of September 5, 2011 8:13:52 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have said: >> >>> Using FreeBSD 8.1, amd64 - I wanted to recover files from a snapshot of >>> usr/home. Everything I've found via googling refers to a link such as >>> "path/zfs/.snapshot" >> >> --As for the rest, it is mine. >> >> Try "path/.zfs". ;) >> >> (Which, on my system, then has a 'snapshot' directory, which holds >> all the snapshots.) >> >> Daniel T. Staal >> > > No such luck. The following: > > cd / > ls -R | grep -i "zfs" > > finds only 'zfs' directories in the source tree and ports. > > Other ideas? I know the snapshots exist, I can see 'em with > "zfs list -t snapshot". The .zfs directory is normally hidden, so it won't even show up on ls -a output. You have to either explicitly cd to it or make it visible by zfs set snapdir=visible From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 16:16:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD99C106566B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:16:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7558C8FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so4749988fxe.13 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:16:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1pandR0pa1Z5elx2DyXFEix2ZuH+noUh7Q8nf2iS6tM=; b=ddiqF4uSHpXzrlvnhvuv8xqyUuq8LO6ghTjxefPqbEWnMrEmS2MkP/OJdyMWWFd+7h Uo234FiovoY0VtmGaglE6R8njVER4TIQP4wn62MxMOW4XiGPlEKDITAtI9jJNUM+bBoV 99Hmiax7V5SGE08zrlJHUur2whfA1T9otXQpQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.88.214 with SMTP id b22mr259384fam.5.1315239366366; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.23.135 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:16:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:16:06 -0400 Message-ID: From: Outback Dingo To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Pierre-Luc Drouin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:16:08 -0000 FreeBSD On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:47:03 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> so I have a friend who is looking for the best OS for a web server, that >> allows to configure services (I guess HTTP, PHP, MySQL and web content) >> and do the OS maintenance (OS & package updates, firewall configuration) >> without having to touch a shell. I was wondering if something like >> PC-BSD + CPanel would be the way to go. Would there be other BSD-based >> alternatives? I always do upgrades and configure services through the >> shell and I am not aware too much about the GUI alternatives... > FreeBSD and ISPCP do wonders and its not bloated like cpanel, source available and it just works, webmin is junk, and cpanel is resource intensive > There are webbased configuration tools that run on common > service combinations (like Apache + MySQL + PHP) that can > be installed. However _installing_ them requires a skilled > person who is able to administrate a server, which in turn > traditionally implies the ability to use the command line, > even if it's just for that "abstraction job". > > FreeBSD can be the OS running such a combination. > > PC-BSD primarily aims at desktop usage, so for example it > defaults to KDE, office applications, multimedia stuff and > all the things you traditionally won't want on a server. > > Software solutions that come to mind are CPanel or WebMin. > Maybe there are others? I'm not sure as I void those mostly > inflexible, error-prone, overcomplicated and dangerous > piles of bloat whenever possible. :-) > > For managing installed applications (ports), there are > KDE tools for that (at least _have been_ in the past, > not sure if they are still being maintained). The system > cannot be updated by a GUI tool (why should it?), but > it should be a job of max. 30 minutes to create a Tcl/Tk > GUI wrapper for those things. And firewall configuration: > I'm quite sure PC-BSD has something for that, except that > it probably won't give you the flexibility to automatically > change firewall rules depending on different kinds of > attacks the server will encounter. > > Please keep in mind: If you're running a web server, you're > part of the target group of thousands of "villains" across > the Internet who will happily exploit any weakness you are > presenting to them, depending on the services and software > you run. > > What's possible to run will also depend on what kind of > server you have. For example if you run a server without > any GPU, but PC-BSD depends on hardware-accellerated 3D > graphics for managing the firewall, then... you know. :-) > > There still is a question that your friend should give an > answer to himself: Wouldn't it be worth investing in basic > UNIX skills and command line operations to gain knowledge > and experience to professionally administer a server instead > of relying on abstracted layers of abstracted abstractions > that GUIs provide here, maybe paying with speed and security > loss? > > It's like driving a car; you _can_ pay a driver to drive > your car all the time, but maybe you should consider to learn > how to drive yourself. :-) > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 16:29:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4C11065673 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:29:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from redcondor1.peak.org (redcondor1.peak.org [69.59.192.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8BD8FC17 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail-mta01.peak.org ([207.55.16.111]) by redcondor1.peak.org ({e03e86cd-14ae-47ce-9578-3c080ce9c462}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20110905162932006 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:29:32 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from maple.localnet (unknown [207.55.106.132]) by zmail-mta01.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF1F2492036 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oak.localnet (oak.localnet [IPv6:2001:1938:266::6f:616b]) by maple.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id C634661F9B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41405C18C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p85GTTRD080384; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:29:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> <0FE472B72B858F5A6EF0FD01@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> <20110905152046.M44028@brightstar.bomgardner.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:29:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20110905152046.M44028@brightstar.bomgardner.net> (Gene's message of "Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:23:32 -0500") Message-ID: <87mxej54wn.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Help Finding ZFS snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:29:32 -0000 "Gene" writes: > On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:48:22 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote >> --As of September 5, 2011 8:13:52 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have said: >> >> > Using FreeBSD 8.1, amd64 - I wanted to recover files from a snapshot of >> > usr/home. Everything I've found via googling refers to a link such as >> > "path/zfs/.snapshot" >> >> --As for the rest, it is mine. >> >> Try "path/.zfs". ;) >> >> (Which, on my system, then has a 'snapshot' directory, which holds >> all the snapshots.) >> >> Daniel T. Staal >> > > No such luck. The following: > > cd / > ls -R | grep -i "zfs" > > finds only 'zfs' directories in the source tree and ports. > > Other ideas? I know the snapshots exist, I can see 'em with > "zfs list -t snapshot". The .zfs directory is hidden by default so you have to specifically ls or go into them. Do a 'ls' on the base directory of any zfs file system, and then add .zfs to the end and you should see the .snapshots directory. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 17:21:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270C41065672 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74458FC17 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p85HLIKw008295; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:21:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p85HLI6H008292; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:21:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:21:18 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Graham Bentley In-Reply-To: <45FC473B20A540FB8BC59D14A35989D2@admin> Message-ID: References: <20110905120034.969251065832@hub.freebsd.org> <45FC473B20A540FB8BC59D14A35989D2@admin> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:21:18 -0600 (MDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter devel-20110704-exp at wonkity.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re-create MBR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:21:23 -0000 On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, Graham Bentley wrote: > I had to install Linux to participate in a project I was involved with. > Now is all finished I have restored the partition but now > need a 3bsd boot sector back. Scheme is ; > > 0 Primary XP > 0 Extended FAT32 > 1 Primary FreeBSD > > Approx 1/3 disc for each. How can I restore the 3bsd > boot sector? If you mean the FreeBSD boot0 multi-boot loader, see boot0cfg(8). It can be run from a live CD like mfsBSD (http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 19:25:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88877106564A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 19:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moritz@barfooze.de) Received: from barfooze.de (barfooze.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:7d:200:0:4e2e:75d4:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540968FC0C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 19:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moritz by barfooze.de with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R0en7-00082r-KZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:25:09 +0200 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:25:09 +0200 From: Moritz Wilhelmy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110905192509.GF22957@barfooze.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: weekly_status_pkg_enable and vulnerabilities X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:25:11 -0000 Hi, is there a way to show only ports where security advisories have been posted in the weekly output, similar to enabling weekly_status_pkg_enable in periodic.conf? Moritz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 20:09:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A5D1065673 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2682F8FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p85K9t3N054557 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:09:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p85K9t3N054557 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315253395; bh=5tRb8juz8lHWWt6zgS9eT4cPGdkDEc4OXE4By9nQRc8=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E652C8C.6070800@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20M on,=2005=20Sep=202011=2021:09:48=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.1)=20Gecko/2 0110830=20Thunderbird/6.0.1|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Moritz=20Wil helmy=20|CC:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subje ct:=20Re:=20weekly_status_pkg_enable=20and=20vulnerabilities|Refer ences:=20<20110905192509.GF22957@barfooze.de>|In-Reply-To:=20<2011 0905192509.GF22957@barfooze.de>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.3.1|OpenPG P:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3D pgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0 A=20boundary=3D"------------enig0BE61BF690723D45257C7B20"; b=gafYqFgYV5m2uPwzKjOq982fTY1g79/qdBRgvfAnR7JUlrXCWSvJ55dxy3MirTA+Z CDSZjUP56h+rNz6pUUxpwcLCbMfV4S7MWLTXbvd0wANpZbK5aDTMSNFsqb/vB9JIx/ Gv5A+fxQFaq3vGsFqqYy3WG4AP9JZ/uaRYFzwG6w= Message-ID: <4E652C8C.6070800@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:09:48 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Moritz Wilhelmy References: <20110905192509.GF22957@barfooze.de> In-Reply-To: <20110905192509.GF22957@barfooze.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0BE61BF690723D45257C7B20" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: weekly_status_pkg_enable and vulnerabilities X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:09:59 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0BE61BF690723D45257C7B20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/09/2011 20:25, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > is there a way to show only ports where security advisories have been > posted in the weekly output, similar to enabling > weekly_status_pkg_enable in periodic.conf? Not specifically weekly. There's a *daily* security check on installed ports if you install ports-mgmt/portaudit If you really want a weekly rather than a daily report, you could adapt ${LOCALBASE}/etc/periodic/security/410.portaudit into ${LOCALBASE}/etc/periodic/weekly/410.portaudit pretty easily. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig0BE61BF690723D45257C7B20 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5lLJMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwLjQCfZox2jVGOTWGayol2mooaITUu qvIAn2B12s/WrS3Ghu/hTevgAv1+9i31 =asu0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0BE61BF690723D45257C7B20-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 20:31:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278B71065670 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:31:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moritz@barfooze.de) Received: from barfooze.de (barfooze.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:7d:200:0:4e2e:75d4:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD43F8FC1C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moritz by barfooze.de with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R0foz-0006NT-Ul for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 22:31:09 +0200 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 22:31:09 +0200 From: Moritz Wilhelmy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110905203109.GG22957@barfooze.de> References: <20110905192509.GF22957@barfooze.de> <4E652C8C.6070800@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E652C8C.6070800@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: weekly_status_pkg_enable and vulnerabilities X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:31:11 -0000 Hi, On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 21:09:48 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 05/09/2011 20:25, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > > is there a way to show only ports where security advisories have been > > posted in the weekly output, similar to enabling > > weekly_status_pkg_enable in periodic.conf? > > Not specifically weekly. There's a *daily* security check on installed > ports if you install ports-mgmt/portaudit > > If you really want a weekly rather than a daily report, you could adapt > ${LOCALBASE}/etc/periodic/security/410.portaudit into > ${LOCALBASE}/etc/periodic/weekly/410.portaudit pretty easily. Thanks, Matthew, portaudit is what I was looking for. Moritz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 21:49:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5A31065675 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:49:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from redcondor2.peak.org (redcondor2.peak.org [69.59.192.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8148FC12 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail-mta02.peak.org ([207.55.16.112]) by redcondor2.peak.org ({6c724cae-de34-4c5f-b615-3072b86419fa}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20110905214931370 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:49:31 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from maple.localnet (unknown [207.55.106.132]) by zmail-mta02.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD4AF6C8831 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:49:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oak.localnet (oak.localnet [IPv6:2001:1938:266::6f:616b]) by maple.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD0461F9B for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9605BCF8D for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p85LnTDw081746; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:49:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110905175808.6b534002.freebsd@edvax.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:49:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20110905175808.6b534002.freebsd@edvax.de> (Polytropon's message of "Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:58:08 +0200") Message-ID: <87ipp664nq.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: cpio command and schg flags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:49:32 -0000 Polytropon writes: > On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:32:05 -0400, joeb1 wrote: >> I am trying to use this code sequence to clone a directory tree. >> mkdir /usr/test1 >> cd /var >> find . | cpio -dmp /usr/test1 >> >> The result is /usr/test1 gets populated with the directory tree but >> all the schg flags get stripped off. >> >> How can I keep the schg flags in the cloned directory? > > As far as I remember, cpio doesn't copy flags. But you > can use either dump + restore, or dpdup (from ports). > >>>From "man cpdup": > > The cpdup utility makes an exact mirror copy of > the source in the destination, creating and > deleting files and directories as necessary. > UTimes, hardlinks, softlinks, devices, permissions, > and flags are mirrored. > > Flags are explicitely mentioned here. Maybe you can give > this program a try? I think that tar will also work (but not gnu tar), and it is part of the base system. The manpage does show an example of how to do this, but calls it moving the file heirarchy. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 22:17:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3D6106564A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 22:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: from mailhost.ssr.com (mailhost.ssr.com [199.4.235.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C2B78FC1A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 22:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81561 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2011 21:45:43 -0000 Received: from pool-71-167-240-59.nycmny.east.verizon.net (HELO irelay.ssr.com) (sdb@71.167.240.59) by 199.4.235.5 with SMTP; 5 Sep 2011 21:45:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 91892 invoked by uid 103); 5 Sep 2011 21:35:52 -0000 Date: 5 Sep 2011 21:35:52 -0000 Message-ID: <20110905213552.91891.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> From: Scott Ballantyne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Evolution problems... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 22:17:11 -0000 Hope someone can help... I finally upgraded firefox, and in the course of this, libnotify.so.1 seems to have been deleted, which is required by "evolution". So I tried deinstalling evolution, and then reinstalling: ------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if graphics/gtk-update-icon-cache already installed ===> gtk-update-icon-cache-2.24.6 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of graphics/gtk-update-icon-cache without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gtk-update-icon-cache. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gtk-update-icon-cache. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/evolution. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/evolution. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/evolution. ----------------------------------------------------- make deinstall: ===> Deinstalling for mail/evolution ===> evolution not installed, skipping ------------------------------------------------------- portmaster is not helpful. Any clues would be most welcome. Thanks so much. Scott -- sdb@ssr.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 23:27:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B94A106564A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694FB8FC0A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadx2 with SMTP id x2so8893709iad.13 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:27:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BuWnTreVESf9iPEghsrK8cIKGEmhAi7dYy2y0oMz5IM=; b=H1zjmJmhJTE3KeoaSsZq41zcFyr7xUz+c2JJhJBqgQF6pAbiucWEFmnOgbiMQV58mq n1PzI0YtXUtQiCGabxhnIIi5Yv23TmAHGSqJkAbAelZyGHk6jkmfXAxyDYIvX1QPxP3g Ts5dNqF1gcVzd8rpgAk8XdGqbOujwKcFDpsZ0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.49.69 with SMTP id uz5mr4008104icb.446.1315265266747; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.177.3 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:27:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 18:27:46 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:27:47 -0000 Dear folks, sorry to bother you guys, but I am encountering a problem updating I need 4 ports only, but can't get past the error above: Building new INDEX files... done. ===>>> New version available: ca_root_nss-3.12.11_1 ===>>> New version available: gtk-2.24.6 ===>>> New version available: gtk-update-icon-cache-2.24.6 ===>>> New version available: firefox-6.0.1,1 ===>>> 402 total installed ports ===>>> 4 have new versions available grullahighschool# portmaster -a ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Found saved configuration for ca_root_nss-3.12.9 => nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: No address record => Attempting to fetch http://mirror3.mirrors.tds.net/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://mirror3.mirrors.tds.net/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch http://mozilla.isc.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://mozilla.isc.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: No route to host => Attempting to fetch http://kyoto-mz-dl.sinet.ad.jp/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://kyoto-mz-dl.sinet.ad.jp/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch http://jp-nii01.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://jp-nii01.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch http://jp-nii02.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://jp-nii02.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch http://mozilla.mtk.nao.ac.jp/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://mozilla.mtk.nao.ac.jp/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/mozilla/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/mozilla/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Moved Temporarily => Attempting to fetch http://mozilla.c3sl.ufpr.br/releases/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://mozilla.c3sl.ufpr.br/releases/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: No address record => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/pub/www/mozilla/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: ftp://ftp.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/pub/www/mozilla/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/mirror/ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: ftp://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/mirror/ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch http://ring.nict.go.jp/archives/net/www/mozilla/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://ring.nict.go.jp/archives/net/www/mozilla/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.twaren.net/Unix/Mozilla/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: http://ftp.twaren.net/Unix/Mozilla/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles// and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/ca_root_nss. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/ca_root_nss. ===>>> make failed for security/ca_root_nss ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for security/ca_root_nss failed ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line: portmaster security/ca_root_nss x11-toolkits/gtk20 graphics/gtk-update-icon-cache www/firefox I tried to get the file manually, but it does not exist. Thanks for advice/suggestions/comments. Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 23:40:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF55D106567D for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:40:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528A78FC0C for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan (a80-101-78-208.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.78.208]) by smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p85NdcRO043293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:39:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from yokozuna.lan (yokozuna.lan [IPv6:::1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p85Ndc0k028061; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:39:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:39:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Beishuizen To: Scott Ballantyne In-Reply-To: <20110905213552.91891.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> Message-ID: References: <20110905213552.91891.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Evolution problems... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:40:11 -0000 On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, the wise Scott Ballantyne wrote: > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gtk-update-icon-cache. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gtk-update-icon-cache. > *** Error code 1 Try deinstalling and reinstalling gtk-update-icon-cache first. Regards, Marco -- My father was a God-fearing man, but he never missed a copy of the New York Times, either. -- E. B. White From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 23:47:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8784F1065688 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158858FC15 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so5060438fxe.13 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3kpPsQ//IDGRGXnKGqcV6yKs1ElozpHpEKCvMxiHQo4=; b=or8A3j289S3qt1lEarj2Ua8xqV7c3oh/qLtuALhD8a063tX4YhBnl8phb5TVOMgQzl jbIGNulr1+61rhrbl1xjHX2zxzXWbFyLUxaNb5Ynvvtw5tGQWUz6f7WMeFJF1ThEZUQA SV8r4mHDMH2Gcs2mggS1UT38oZAOwiiTFxLO4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.71.155 with SMTP id h27mr752287faj.126.1315266464853; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.120.72 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:47:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110905213552.91891.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> References: <20110905213552.91891.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 18:47:44 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Scott Ballantyne Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Evolution problems... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:47:46 -0000 On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Scott Ballantyne wrote: > I finally upgraded firefox, and in the course of this, libnotify.so.1 > seems to have been deleted, which is required by "evolution". > > So I tried deinstalling evolution, and then reinstalling: > There are at least two entries in /usr/ports/UPDATING which you should follow. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 00:19:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903B91065670 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:19:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from msa.vap.navalradio.net (msa.vap.navalradio.net [201.236.67.148]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AA38FC15 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.vap.navalradio.net (www.vap.navalradio.net [172.18.128.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa.vap.navalradio.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8606K0T062406 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:06:20 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <8d457de47ed92550a511265436c183f9.squirrel@www.vap.navalradio.net> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:06:20 -0300 From: "Mikhail Goriachev" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: IPsec phase 1 and 2 negotiation in an infinite loop. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:19:05 -0000 Hi, Can anyone please comment/shed some light/give hints on the following?: I've got a VPN cranking between 8.2-RELEASE-p2 (my end) and an unknown appliance (the other party doesn't want to disclose specs). Everything works just fine and I had a stable and fully established connection for 4 months without a problem. However, today the tunnel went down. I'm using FreeBSD's IPsec and ipsec-tools-0.8.0_2 (racoon). Everything's up to date. The thing is, according to tcpdump, it seems that both machines are trying to get beyond phases 1 and 2 in an infinite loop: 00:00:04.024146 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 378: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 1 I ident 00:00:01.800582 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 126: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 1 R ident 00:00:02.220315 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 378: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 1 I ident 00:00:04.067302 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000069 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:02.393116 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000092 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:01.320660 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 126: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 1 R ident 00:00:00.689822 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000093 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:02.009365 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000099 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:02.010914 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000106 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:02.008823 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000062 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:02.015381 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000089 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:04.005956 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000109 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:04.030017 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000083 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:04.012759 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000100 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:04.007933 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000105 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:04.019993 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 662: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? oakley-quick[E] 00:00:00.000097 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 82: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 2/others ? inf 00:00:04.047917 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 378: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 1 I ident 00:00:00.000108 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 126: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 1 R ident 00:00:02.022728 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 378: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 1 I ident I've restarted both racoon and ipsec several times. Set racoon's log to debug/debug2 but couldn't find any lines relevant to the problem in the logs apart from: [1.2.3.4] DEBUG: malformed cookie received. it has to be as the initiator. Out of desperation and pressure in reestablishing the tunnel I restarted the machine. That did the trick. She's up and running without a problem. Now I'm trying to understand what went wrong and how to prevent this thing from occurring in the future. After doing my homework I suspect that the culprit might've been PF. I completely forgot about it when I was restarting ipsec and racoon. Let me add that the machine was running for months and no settings were changed at all. Could that be the MTU, packet reassembly or anything related to PF? What are the thoughts of people working with VPNs? Configuration files and logs are available on request. Cheers, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Mobile: +56 9 78772741 Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 00:26:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94F8106567A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.warl0ck.1989@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876B18FC15 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yib19 with SMTP id 19so4338773yib.13 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:26:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=eJ1yLs73SOzcQImU9bDf3ZqIVKNUzF7ERmVljK2UelQ=; b=LziEgMseK8PDeop3l88qjaku5KoHqlz4tmO4adk83zoNz1j17SpF8W7dc/2G+p5pcS W2HGCMGo+BfgqvsnTRtak2ryD3ouj4k0eXb/Ji4d9abjR5D1JCq5l3lm9saWKQ9jQ+x7 X16BR8X669thn1VupLGcq2i15E14Qtq5EDBaQ= Received: by 10.68.0.162 with SMTP id 2mr7423269pbf.191.1315268764487; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([117.136.9.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i4sm25790375pbr.4.2011.09.05.17.26.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:26:03 +0800 From: Aaron Lewis To: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <20110906002601.GA21953@localhost> References: <20110905133907.GA13289@localhost> <201109051559.p85FxKMM009306@mail.r-bonomi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201109051559.p85FxKMM009306@mail.r-bonomi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A workable RSS feed for BSDTalk ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:26:05 -0000 > > Hi, > > Is there any workable RSS feeds for BSDTalk channel ? > > Eiher of *.blogspot.com and *.feedburner.com work just fine > > > Both *.blogspot.com and *.feedburner.com are blocked in my country. > > Oh. you need a feed you can access in ${UNNAMED_COUNTRY}. And, apparently > the State of 'Confusion'. > > Hint: if you don't specify the coutry, nobody has a _hope_ of being > able what might be 'not blocked' here. > Sorry man , it's China , and the evil GFW reset all connections it disparages. -- Best Regards, Aaron Lewis - PGP: 0xDFE6C29E ( http://pgp.mit.edu/ ) Finger Print: 9482 448F C7C3 896C 1DFE 7DD3 2492 A7D0 DFE6 C29E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 01:33:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8787A1065675 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:33:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301588FC0C for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p861XmlH047184 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:33:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p861XmOq065810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:33:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p861Xlc0065809; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:33:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:33:47 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Antonio Olivares Message-ID: <20110906013347.GE9801@dan.emsphone.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (email2.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:33:48 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 199.67.51.78 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 01:33:51 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 05), Antonio Olivares said: > Dear folks, > > sorry to bother you guys, but I am encountering a problem updating I > need 4 ports only, but can't get past the error above: > > Building new INDEX files... done. > > ===>>> New version available: ca_root_nss-3.12.11_1 > ===>>> New version available: gtk-2.24.6 > ===>>> New version available: gtk-update-icon-cache-2.24.6 > ===>>> New version available: firefox-6.0.1,1 > ===>>> 402 total installed ports > ===>>> 4 have new versions available > grullahighschool# portmaster -a > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > ===> Found saved configuration for ca_root_nss-3.12.9 > => nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz > fetch: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: No address record This is your main problem; you aren't able to resolve ftp.mozilla.org for some reason. The other sites are mirrors that either aren't mirroring the security subdirectory, or haven't updated their mirror recently enough to have a copy of that file. > I tried to get the file manually, but it does not exist. Thanks for > advice/suggestions/comments. It definitely does exist at the above url. Since you seem to be having DNS issues, try putting 63.245.209.137 ftp.mozilla.org in your /etc/hosts file and try fetching again, since that's what ftp.mozilla.org currently resolves to. Remember to remove the line after fetching, since the IP may change later. http://www.robtex.com/dns/ftp.mozilla.org#records -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 01:52:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B986D106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC5A8FC12 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p861qrWD051495; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:52:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4E657CEA.7080300@sentex.net> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:52:42 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikhail Goriachev References: <8d457de47ed92550a511265436c183f9.squirrel@www.vap.navalradio.net> In-Reply-To: <8d457de47ed92550a511265436c183f9.squirrel@www.vap.navalradio.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPsec phase 1 and 2 negotiation in an infinite loop. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 01:52:57 -0000 On 9/5/2011 8:06 PM, Mikhail Goriachev wrote: > Hi, > > Can anyone please comment/shed some light/give hints on the following?: > > I've got a VPN cranking between 8.2-RELEASE-p2 (my end) and an unknown > appliance (the other party doesn't want to disclose specs). Everything > works just fine and I had a stable and fully established connection for 4 > months without a problem. However, today the tunnel went down. > > I'm using FreeBSD's IPsec and ipsec-tools-0.8.0_2 (racoon). Everything's > up to date. The thing is, according to tcpdump, it seems that both > machines are trying to get beyond phases 1 and 2 in an infinite loop: > > > 00:00:04.024146 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 > (0x0800), length 378: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 1 > I ident > 00:00:01.800582 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 > (0x0800), length 126: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 1 > R ident > > Configuration files and logs are available on request. post a dozen lines of tcpdump -s0 -vvvv -ni port 500 As well as the racoon logs and config as well as setkey -DP ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 03:57:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE998106566B for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 03:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from msa.vap.navalradio.net (msa.vap.navalradio.net [201.236.67.148]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA6E8FC13 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 03:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.vap.navalradio.net (www.vap.navalradio.net [172.18.128.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa.vap.navalradio.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p863wQ5m082065; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 03:58:26 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4E657CEA.7080300@sentex.net> References: <8d457de47ed92550a511265436c183f9.squirrel@www.vap.navalradio.net> <4E657CEA.7080300@sentex.net> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:58:27 -0300 From: "Mikhail Goriachev" To: "Mike Tancsa" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPsec phase 1 and 2 negotiation in an infinite loop. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 03:57:50 -0000 Hi Mike, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 9/5/2011 8:06 PM, Mikhail Goriachev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Can anyone please comment/shed some light/give hints on the following?: >> >> I've got a VPN cranking between 8.2-RELEASE-p2 (my end) and an unknown >> appliance (the other party doesn't want to disclose specs). Everything >> works just fine and I had a stable and fully established connection for >> 4 >> months without a problem. However, today the tunnel went down. >> >> I'm using FreeBSD's IPsec and ipsec-tools-0.8.0_2 (racoon). Everything's >> up to date. The thing is, according to tcpdump, it seems that both >> machines are trying to get beyond phases 1 and 2 in an infinite loop: >> >> >> 00:00:04.024146 00:11:22:33:44:55 > 55:44:33:22:11:00, ethertype IPv4 >> (0x0800), length 378: 1.2.3.4.5.500 > 5.4.3.2.1.500: isakmp: phase 1 >> I ident >> 00:00:01.800582 55:44:33:22:11:00 > 00:11:22:33:44:55, ethertype IPv4 >> (0x0800), length 126: 5.4.3.2.1.500 > 1.2.3.4.5.500: isakmp: phase 1 >> R ident >> >> Configuration files and logs are available on request. > > post a dozen lines of > > tcpdump -s0 -vvvv -ni port 500 I stopped ipsec and racoon. Fired up tcpdump, started ipsec and racoon and sent one ping to the other end. The following is the output: # tcpdump -s0 -vvvv -ni eth0 port 500 tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 03:17:31.410202 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 41076, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 128) a.b.c.d.500 > w.x.y.z.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: phase 1 I ident: (sa: doi=ipsec situation=identity (p: #1 protoid=isakmp transform=1 (t: #1 id=ike (type=lifetype value=sec)(type=lifeduration value=7080)(type=enc value=3des)(type=auth value=preshared)(type=hash value=sha1)(type=group desc value=modp1024)))) (vid: len=16 afcad71372a1f1c96b8696fc99570100) 03:17:31.637424 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 50, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 108) w.x.y.z.500 > a.b.c.d.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: phase 1 R ident: (sa: doi=ipsec situation=identity (p: #1 protoid=isakmp transform=1 (t: #1 id=ike (type=lifetype value=sec)(type=lifeduration value=7080)(type=enc value=3des)(type=auth value=preshared)(type=hash value=sha1)(type=group desc value=modp1024)))) 03:17:31.639838 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 41077, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 208) a.b.c.d.500 > w.x.y.z.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: phase 1 I ident: (ke: key len=128 c86646bb8a5a05d423e94dba3e59924d815f4edaf4747d98fd7d2d01ceba0bc17e00011efc92b7157d8644082c5655eca7d86c47b6015473446ae5875175f0a64d911bb8b16615f60e967c45a79f4bd225f892cfb9e4de481bc2e1f3ef08b442dafcefe887w3a3604c0932761f11247425b7745529bc879591f67f56dda7b2f6) (nonce: n len=16 ecb2af111bcdd6c6220a487a51d58100) 03:17:32.423407 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 50, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 212) w.x.y.z.500 > a.b.c.d.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: phase 1 R ident: (ke: key len=128 f1e1fc68dc231887dd7af4bd758536ae72adaa6c8636ec62bf4a1d97e61fcc8f6af2f287e38de667398ae82286c865gb3301816b31f645f16f592a8a3afd7e3bec7f2d37c355c571700jkac37f288267f2f6a147232463c74f28fga7c89b06ef3aafdc46cf042000f26be2ddg57ede284c393dd7615afbbd64f78d8fea9049b0) (nonce: n len=20 59e43b2c35b61n18d67e7060f32aad1f7891f397) 03:17:32.425834 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 41085, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 96) a.b.c.d.500 > w.x.y.z.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: phase 1 I ident[E]: [encrypted id] 03:17:33.090177 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 50, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 96) w.x.y.z.500 > a.b.c.d.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: phase 1 R ident[E]: [encrypted id] 03:17:33.090311 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 41092, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 112) a.b.c.d.500 > w.x.y.z.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: phase 2/others I inf[E]: [encrypted hash] 03:17:33.090614 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 50, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 96) w.x.y.z.500 > a.b.c.d.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: phase 1 R ident[E]: [encrypted id] 03:17:33.412039 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 41093, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 176) a.b.c.d.500 > w.x.y.z.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: phase 2/others I oakley-quick[E]: [encrypted hash] 03:17:33.615466 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 50, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 184) w.x.y.z.500 > a.b.c.d.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: phase 2/others R oakley-quick[E]: [encrypted hash] 03:17:33.615585 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 41094, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 88) a.b.c.d.500 > w.x.y.z.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: phase 2/others I oakley-quick[E]: [encrypted hash] ^C 11 packets captured 200 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel Note: a.b.c.d is my end. w.x.y.z is the other end. "vid:", "ke:" and "nonce:" are scrambled. > As well as the racoon logs and config as well as setkey -DP The following is a sample of the log when the tunnel was down and I restarted ipsec together with racoon (with the log set to debug) it just keeps going on and on through phase 1 and 2: Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: no check of compression algorithm; not supported in sadb message. Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: getsainfo params: loc='a.b.c.d' rmt='w.x.y.z' peer='NULL' client='NULL' id=0 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: no check of compression algorithm; not supported in sadb message. Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: getsainfo params: loc='192.168.0.1' rmt='192.168.50.1' peer='NULL' client='NULL' id=0 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: evaluating sainfo: loc='a.b.c.d', rmt='w.x.y.z', peer='ANY', id=0 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: check and compare ids : value mismatch (IPv4_address) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: cmpid target: '192.168.0.1' Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: cmpid source: 'a.b.c.d' Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: got pfkey X_SPDDUMP message Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: got pfkey X_SPDDUMP message Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: 192.168.50.1/32[0] 192.168.0.1/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238490: w.x.y.z/32[0] a.b.c.d/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: got pfkey X_SPDDUMP message Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: a.b.c.d/32[0] w.x.y.z/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238490: w.x.y.z/32[0] a.b.c.d/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: a.b.c.d/32[0] w.x.y.z/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238610: 192.168.50.1/32[0] 192.168.0.1/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: got pfkey X_SPDDUMP message Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: 192.168.0.1/32[0] 192.168.50.1/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238490: w.x.y.z/32[0] a.b.c.d/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: 192.168.0.1/32[0] 192.168.50.1/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238610: 192.168.50.1/32[0] 192.168.0.1/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: 192.168.0.1/32[0] 192.168.50.1/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238790: a.b.c.d/32[0] w.x.y.z/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: === Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 336 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 00000000 00000000 01100200 00000000 00000150 0d0000f4 00000001 00000001 000000e8 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: === Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: begin. Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: seen nptype=1(sa) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: seen nptype=13(vid) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: seen nptype=13(vid) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: succeed. Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: received unknown Vendor ID Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: f4ed19e0 c114eb51 6faaac0e e37daf28 07b4381f 00000001 00001388 00000000 00000000 18600000 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: total SA len=240 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 00000001 00000001 000000e8 01010006 03000028 01010000 80010007 80020002 80030001 80040002 800b0001 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: begin. Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: seen nptype=2(prop) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: succeed. Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: proposal #1 len=232 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: begin. Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: seen nptype=3(trns) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach last message repeated 5 times Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: succeed. Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: transform #1 len=40 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Encryption Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=AES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encryption(aes) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=SHA Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hash(sha1) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, flag=0x8000, lorv=pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Duration, flag=0x0000, lorv=4 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=256 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: transform #2 len=40 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Encryption Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=AES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encryption(aes) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=MD5 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hash(md5) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, flag=0x8000, lorv=pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Duration, flag=0x0000, lorv=4 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=256 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: transform #3 len=36 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Encryption Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=3DES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encryption(3des) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=SHA Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hash(sha1) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, flag=0x8000, lorv=pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Duration, flag=0x0000, lorv=4 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: transform #4 len=36 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Encryption Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=3DES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encryption(3des) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=MD5 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hash(md5) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, flag=0x8000, lorv=pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Duration, flag=0x0000, lorv=4 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: transform #5 len=36 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Encryption Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=DES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encryption(des) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=SHA Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hash(sha1) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, flag=0x8000, lorv=pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Duration, flag=0x0000, lorv=4 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: transform #6 len=36 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Encryption Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=DES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encryption(des) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=MD5 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hash(md5) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, flag=0x8000, lorv=pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Duration, flag=0x0000, lorv=4 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pair 1: Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 0x8012275a0: next=0x0 tnext=0x8012275c0 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 0x8012275c0: next=0x0 tnext=0x8012275e0 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 0x8012275e0: next=0x0 tnext=0x801227600 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 0x801227600: next=0x0 tnext=0x801227620 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 0x801227620: next=0x0 tnext=0x801227640 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 0x801227640: next=0x0 tnext=0x0 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: proposal #1: 6 transform Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Encryption Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=AES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=SHA Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, flag=0x8000, lorv=pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Duration, flag=0x0000, lorv=4 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=256 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: prop#=1, prot-id=ISAKMP, spi-size=0, #trns=6 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: trns#=1, trns-id=IKE Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: lifetime = 86400 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: lifebyte = 0 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: enctype = AES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encklen = 256 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hashtype = SHA Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: authmethod = pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: dh_group = 1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Encryption Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=AES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=MD5 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, flag=0x8000, lorv=pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Duration, flag=0x0000, lorv=4 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Key Length, flag=0x8000, lorv=256 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: prop#=1, prot-id=ISAKMP, spi-size=0, #trns=6 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: trns#=2, trns-id=IKE Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: lifetime = 86400 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: lifebyte = 0 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: enctype = AES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encklen = 256 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hashtype = MD5 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: authmethod = pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: dh_group = 1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Encryption Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=3DES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, lorv=SHA Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, flag=0x8000, lorv=pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Group Description, flag=0x8000, lorv=1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Type, flag=0x8000, lorv=seconds Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Life Duration, flag=0x0000, lorv=4 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: prop#=1, prot-id=ISAKMP, spi-size=0, #trns=6 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: trns#=3, trns-id=IKE Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: lifetime = 86400 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: lifebyte = 0 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: enctype = 3DES-CBC Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encklen = 0 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hashtype = SHA Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: authmethod = pre-shared key Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: dh_group = 1024-bit MODP group Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: an acceptable proposal found. Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hmac(modp1024) Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: agreed on pre-shared key auth. Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: === Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: new cookie: 2d88244be68bad7a Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: add payload of len 52, next type 0 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 84 bytes from a.b.c.d[500] to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sockname a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet from a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 1 times of 84 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 2d88344b e68aad8a 01100200 00000000 00000054 00000038 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: resend phase1 packet 67d0a5ad431e746f:2d88244be68bad7a Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: === Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 336 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 00000000 00000000 01100200 00000000 00000150 0d0000f4 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sockname a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet from a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 1 times of 84 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 2d88344b e68aad8a 01100200 00000000 00000054 00000038 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: got pfkey FLUSH message Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: got pfkey X_SPDFLUSH message Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: got pfkey REGISTER message Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: got pfkey X_SPDADD message Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: got pfkey X_SPDADD message Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: w.x.y.z/32[0] a.b.c.d/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238490: a.b.c.d/32[0] w.x.y.z/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: got pfkey X_SPDADD message Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: 192.168.0.1/32[0] 192.168.50.1/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238490: a.b.c.d/32[0] w.x.y.z/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: 192.168.0.1/32[0] 192.168.50.1/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238610: w.x.y.z/32[0] a.b.c.d/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: pk_recv: retry[0] recv() Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: got pfkey X_SPDADD message Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: 192.168.50.1/32[0] 192.168.0.1/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238490: a.b.c.d/32[0] w.x.y.z/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: 192.168.50.1/32[0] 192.168.0.1/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238610: w.x.y.z/32[0] a.b.c.d/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sub:0x7fffffffe3e0: 192.168.50.1/32[0] 192.168.0.1/32[0] proto=any dir=in Sep 5 20:40:29 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: db :0x801238790: 192.168.0.1/32[0] 192.168.50.1/32[0] proto=any dir=out Sep 5 20:40:31 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: === Sep 5 20:40:31 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 336 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:31 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 00000000 00000000 01100200 00000000 00000150 0d0000f4 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:31 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sockname a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:31 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet from a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:31 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:31 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 1 times of 84 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:31 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 2d88344b e68aad8a 01100200 00000000 00000054 00000038 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:33 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: === Sep 5 20:40:33 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 336 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:33 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 00000000 00000000 01100200 00000000 00000150 0d0000f4 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:33 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sockname a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:33 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet from a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:33 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:33 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 1 times of 84 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:33 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 2d88344b e68aad8a 01100200 00000000 00000054 00000038 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:36 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: === Sep 5 20:40:36 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 336 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:36 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 00000000 00000000 01100200 00000000 00000150 0d0000f4 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:36 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sockname a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:36 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet from a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:36 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:36 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 1 times of 84 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:36 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 2d88344b e68aad8a 01100200 00000000 00000054 00000038 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:37 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 84 bytes from a.b.c.d[500] to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:37 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sockname a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:37 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet from a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:37 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:37 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 1 times of 84 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:37 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 2d88344b e68aad8a 01100200 00000000 00000054 00000038 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:37 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: resend phase1 packet 67d0a5ad431e746f:2d88244be68bad7a Sep 5 20:40:38 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: === Sep 5 20:40:38 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 336 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:38 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 00000000 00000000 01100200 00000000 00000150 0d0000f4 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:38 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: sockname a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:38 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet from a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:38 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: send packet to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:38 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 1 times of 84 bytes message will be sent to w.x.y.z[500] Sep 5 20:40:38 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 2d88344b e68aad8a 01100200 00000000 00000054 00000038 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:38 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: deleted the retransmission packet to w.x.y.z[500]. Sep 5 20:40:42 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: === Sep 5 20:40:42 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 336 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to a.b.c.d[500] Sep 5 20:40:42 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 67d0a8dd 454e766f 00000000 00000000 01100200 00000000 00000150 0d0000f4 00000001 00000001 Sep 5 20:40:42 vpnmach racoon: [w.x.y.z] DEBUG: malformed cookie received. it has to be as the initiator. 67d0a5ad431e746f:2d88244be68bad7a Sep 5 20:40:46 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: === Sep 5 20:40:46 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: 336 bytes message received from w.x.y.z[500] to a.b.c.d[500] Note: a.b.c.d my public end, w.x.y.z the other public end. 192.168.0.1 my private end and 192.168.50.1 is the other private end. Some field are scrumbled. Configuration files: ====== /etc/ipsec.conf spdadd a.b.c.d w.x.y.z any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/a.b.c.d-w.x.y.z/unique; spdadd w.x.y.z a.b.c.d any -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/w.x.y.z-a.b.c.d/unique; spdadd 192.168.0.1 192.168.50.1 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/a.b.c.d-w.x.y.z/unique; spdadd 192.168.50.1 192.168.0.1 any -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/w.x.y.z-a.b.c.d/unique; ====== /usr/local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf path pre_shared_key "/usr/local/etc/racoon/psk.keys"; listen { isakmp a.b.c.d; } remote w.x.y.z { exchange_mode main; proposal_check obey; proposal { encryption_algorithm 3des; hash_algorithm sha1; authentication_method pre_shared_key; dh_group modp1024; } } sainfo address a.b.c.d any address w.x.y.z any { encryption_algorithm 3des; authentication_algorithm hmac_sha1; compression_algorithm deflate; } sainfo address 192.168.0.1 any address 192.168.50.1 any { encryption_algorithm 3des; authentication_algorithm hmac_sha1; compression_algorithm deflate; } ====== /etc/pf.conf ... scrub in all no-df random-id ... block log all ... pass in log on $EIF proto udp from w.x.y.z port isakmp to $EIF:0 port isakmp pass in log on $EIF proto esp from w.x.y.z to $EIF:0 ... # setkey -DP w.x.y.z[any] a.b.c.d[any] any in ipsec esp/tunnel/w.x.y.z-a.b.c.d/unique#16394 spid=10 seq=3 pid=14210 refcnt=1 192.168.50.1[any] 192.168.0.1[any] any in ipsec esp/tunnel/w.x.y.z-a.b.c.d/unique#16396 spid=12 seq=2 pid=14210 refcnt=1 a.b.c.d[any] w.x.y.z[any] any out ipsec esp/tunnel/a.b.c.d-w.x.y.z/unique#16393 spid=9 seq=1 pid=14210 refcnt=1 192.168.0.1[any] 192.168.50.1[any] any out ipsec esp/tunnel/a.b.c.d-w.x.y.z/unique#16395 spid=11 seq=0 pid=14210 refcnt=1 Note: a.b.c.d my public end, w.x.y.z the other public end. 192.168.0.1 my private end and 192.168.50.1 is the other private end. Thanks for looking into that. Cheers, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Mobile: +56 9 78772741 Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 08:29:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB66B106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D2C8FC08 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn22 with SMTP id 22so3201004yxn.13 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 01:29:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VU1DmQTHtx9pHzqxMY1dTcGnKu7zIb2YBUFJNarz5u8=; b=d6eDnQfUoDUy1hYoAmSAmwmZHFGNAeAZTa98ccH+qVdfr48Qyuw1olQPSj753bGX8u KmGKIiocU37TA2wxQR4qqy+4lLOTez673rcSYSYbVwhazXFgE28W9zybnPcaB3nzapGA 4qP7bG5qo0aUBVsuboaZ4QlLGmuHFWPYIqv5A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.136.41 with SMTP id v29mr22426613yhi.80.1315297798555; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 01:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.110.49 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:29:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110905155803.M77497@brightstar.bomgardner.net> References: <20110905130325.M78491@brightstar.bomgardner.net> <0FE472B72B858F5A6EF0FD01@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> <20110905152046.M44028@brightstar.bomgardner.net> <562EFE312E210988D299516F@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> <20110905155803.M77497@brightstar.bomgardner.net> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:29:58 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Gene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Help Finding ZFS snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:29:59 -0000 On 5 September 2011 16:58, Gene wrote: > On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:35:34 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote > > --As of September 5, 2011 10:23:32 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have > > said: > > > > > On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:48:22 -0400, Daniel Staal wrote > > >> --As of September 5, 2011 8:13:52 AM -0500, Gene is alleged to have > said: > > >> > > >> > Using FreeBSD 8.1, amd64 - I wanted to recover files from a snapshot > of > > >> > usr/home. Everything I've found via googling refers to a link such > as > > >> > "path/zfs/.snapshot" > > >> > > >> --As for the rest, it is mine. > > >> > > >> Try "path/.zfs". ;) > > >> > > >> (Which, on my system, then has a 'snapshot' directory, which holds > > >> all the snapshots.) > > >> > > >> Daniel T. Staal > > >> > > > > > > No such luck. The following: > > > > > > cd / > > > ls -R | grep -i "zfs" > > > > > > finds only 'zfs' directories in the source tree and ports. > > > > > > Other ideas? I know the snapshots exist, I can see 'em with > > > "zfs list -t snapshot". > > > > --As for the rest, it is mine. > > > > Don't check if the directory is there first. It isn't. Just 'cd' > > to it, and it will exist. > > > > Daniel T. Staal > > Well I'll be hornswaggled ... Thanks! > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > as others have posted its hidden. This is for good reason though. Just imagine you backup program trawling your 10 TB array that has 100 historical snapshots. Suddenly you are backing up 1 PB 8( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 13:22:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A57E106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:22:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0748FC16 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a] (saphire3.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:f025:8813:7603:7e4a]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p86DMNu9096413; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:22:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4E661E83.9050507@sentex.net> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:22:11 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikhail Goriachev References: <8d457de47ed92550a511265436c183f9.squirrel@www.vap.navalradio.net> <4E657CEA.7080300@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPsec phase 1 and 2 negotiation in an infinite loop. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:22:27 -0000 On 9/5/2011 11:58 PM, Mikhail Goriachev wrote: > (p: #1 protoid=isakmp transform=1 > (t: #1 id=ike (type=lifetype value=sec)(type=lifeduration > value=7080)(type=enc value=3des)(type=auth > value=preshared)(type=hash value=sha1)(type=group desc > value=modp1024)))) > (vid: len=16 afcad71372a1f1c96b8696fc99570100) > 03:17:31.637424 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 50, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP > (17), length 108) > w.x.y.z.500 > a.b.c.d.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: > phase 1 R ident: > (sa: doi=ipsec situation=identity > (p: #1 protoid=isakmp transform=1 > (t: #1 id=ike (type=lifetype value=sec)(type=lifeduration > value=7080)(type=enc value=3des)(type=auth > value=preshared)(type=hash value=sha1)(type=group desc > value=modp1024)))) OK, both sides are 3des, psk and sha1 dhgroup 1. Thats good. > > Note: a.b.c.d is my end. w.x.y.z is the other end. "vid:", "ke:" and > "nonce:" are scrambled. > flag=0x8000, lorv=AES-CBC > Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encryption(aes) > Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, > lorv=MD5 > Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hash(md5) > Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, ... yet, you have AES and md5 ?? where are those coming from ? Do you have an extra config for the remote somewhere in your files perhaps that is matching ? ---Mike > remote w.x.y.z { > exchange_mode main; > proposal_check obey; > > proposal { > encryption_algorithm 3des; > hash_algorithm sha1; > authentication_method pre_shared_key; > dh_group modp1024; > } > } > -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 13:33:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF6F1065739 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavierfreebsdquestions@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7E78FC12 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywa17 with SMTP id 17so483737ywa.13 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 06:33:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=L0liqX6Drtmf785mTEmZh0BdjH72exFbZk5PEiNWBrY=; b=s87m2cJ66zDX7TmdfkT16jSv8iS4H68vR7lQEDGy/giWufVnMbhi65qjGoLVoBsEOq cZ1QcoRxmedUMKWmo7JI6y1q0zUByaNup1AH4gzQze0F3IiXx/idbNQ9omlpI134d6sx trszO0WcWvYP3UI99+Xv0bOx6a9xPajYs70co= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.168.135 with SMTP id w7mr4229315icy.288.1315314650632; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 06:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.223.65 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 06:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:10:50 +0200 Message-ID: From: Xavier FreeBSD questions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: fetchmail in "system-wide mode" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:33:48 -0000 Hello, On the Internet there are some sites where they say to start fetchmail(1) in "system-wide" should put these two options in rc.conf(5) : fetchmail_enable="YES" fetchmail_polling_interval="60" Although the second is optional and at first has little to do with this question because this question is addressed rather to the first option. I searched in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and rc.conf(5) manual and find no reference to these two options. I have them in my rc.conf(5) but fetchmail(1) does not start automatically. In /usr/src/UPDATING not found any reference to it. Which is the correct way to start fetchmail(1) in "system-wide"? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 14:12:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B823F106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jordanbhandy@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A39A8FC0C for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yib19 with SMTP id 19so4746510yib.13 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:12:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=Cemf4B4txsqviLLufvPmraTJ1gMZQ4FPo7iLXGLj39E=; b=vLMrgQVAbxZqPyI2UXJvE0TvFKmLRLNA/F39TiOMH6HCWjeQHRaMH7XGRejFnRzb4F xYe7BxvynWwsOIAroEG9De/H7IlHVUIlUf/56xhVO1QLrv4bAshIPPZBYrmL42ZB+aQ9 blDQJQXnSnhnCh/bUs+pV0EXnPF+ZF37N9gVQ= Received: by 10.68.20.137 with SMTP id n9mr10041433pbe.199.1315318355501; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (c-98-202-122-208.hsd1.ut.comcast.net. [98.202.122.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p7sm588669pbe.0.2011.09.06.07.12.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:12:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Monkeyfoahead Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:12:32 -0600 Message-Id: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: bb hang detected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:12:36 -0000 Hello, periodically I get a "ath0 bb hang detected resetting" message on = my console. When this happens, sometimes it sets my default route to = 0.0.0.0/24. Is there a way to make my routing tables unchangeable? Or to = stop the bb hang error? Thanks= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 14:55:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5BE106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:55:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (client-82-26-127-91.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [82.26.127.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32CF8FC1A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1R0wUy-000MlH-QL for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:19:36 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:19:36 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110906141936.GC61079@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: fetchmail in "system-wide mode" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:55:28 -0000 --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:10:50PM +0200, Xavier FreeBSD questions wrote: > Hello, >=20 > On the Internet there are some sites where they say to start fetchmail(1)= in > "system-wide" should put these two options in rc.conf(5) : >=20 > fetchmail_enable=3D"YES" > fetchmail_polling_interval=3D"60" This has worked for me in the past when I've needed fetchmail(1). >=20 > Although the second is optional and at first has little to do with this > question because this question is addressed rather to the first option. >=20 > I searched in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and rc.conf(5) manual and find no > reference to these two options. This is to be expected. fetchmail(1) is a port, not part of the base system. >=20 > I have them in my rc.conf(5) but fetchmail(1) does not start automaticall= y. >=20 > In /usr/src/UPDATING not found any reference to it. Again, what you'd expect. >=20 > Which is the correct way to start fetchmail(1) in "system-wide"? Is fetchmail installed on your system? If so, and you still can't get it to start automatically, try this: # script fetchmail_startup sh -x /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fetchmail start You'll now have a file called `fetchmail_startup' which will contain a record of exactly what the fetchmail rc script did as it executed, which may or may not prove informative. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk5mK/gACgkQixf5fBYiFmqB4QCfZSlb392OnRzacbvW1nE2pkQn P6YAoNVSBGxFY2SXF0buNIq5oUVb2DmT =bpbA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 14:58:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6641F106566B for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97398FC2B for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so5775115fxe.13 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:58:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khera.org; s=google11; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aFhlTXhC3mIE5gSoP+h2MA7ussHAw3b8COHkb3/EBjY=; b=U+Quv4XiWS/Kdq7HdGztUnOLN+fx2ESe64ZVIjq6mHwE4hZN+ErAjo/Ylja/yKnZWz NWsSQ0zzbLbmsSRyoZ2bsG68mAvwaR20SJ1fMk2MlyEVFbXbJ8mh+CaHbiKzXzwqCDjJ QKo89GCjg0MBgON6Te03Dm+Xbr21ZPiEgbgBg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.34.91 with SMTP id k27mr334271fad.133.1315318420893; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.102.79 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:13:40 -0400 Message-ID: From: Vick Khera To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: ejabberd cannot be controlled with ejabberdctl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:58:11 -0000 A while ago I upgraded ejabberd from 2.1.5 to 2.1.8, and also updated erlang to r14b03 (not sure the prior version, but it was an r14 release). Running on FreeBSD 8.2/i386. Ever since the upgrade, I cannot use the ejabberdctl program to control it. It always says "Failed RPC connection to the node ejabberd@lorax: nodedown". The short host name of my server is "lorax". If I log into the web interface, it does show node "ejabberd@lorax" is running as the only node. Up until this upgrade I was able to use ejabberdctl just fine to re-open logs and do clean shutdown. I searched the forums and mailing lists and found basically that I need to ensure that when ejabberd starts, it uses the same node name. I checked the start scripts and it does indeed (and always has) explicitly set the node name to "ejabberd@lorax", so I'm pretty well stumped at this point. The only tricky part of the config is that I bound the web interface to the private IP of this machine, instead of the public (it has two NICs). I'm using the FreeBSD port version of both erlang and ejabberd. Any help would be appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 14:59:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04742106566C for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:59:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joeb1@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBF28FC1F for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:59:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=ChCJrYjaO2L8EgEFxWVOJJCnjOSYRMR8MqOthxx0IQw=; b=aaJEiT/u4e+07tVg2qqSq1zgtsqEYhPJNzkcD2XLOX6BJifSaIiWbA665r9784stW+o/ZCEm6U8WLPgKEyHhH98VLZC68x71GjV0c+xJPIfeEENEsKe2BkYqSyY0fLFf488CRFrGwgso+3wP0Vn3ypN76j7rgZS1XdG/gK3gp5U= Received: from laptop ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:59:01 -0700 From: "joeb1" To: "Questions@Freebsd. Org" Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:59:05 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6090 Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2011 14:59:01.0773 (UTC) FILETIME=[83741BD0:01CC6CA5] X-Sender: joeb1@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: joeb1*a1poweruser.com Cc: Subject: FW: cpio command and schg flags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joeb1@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:59:06 -0000 > I am trying to use this code sequence to clone a directory tree. > mkdir /usr/test1 > cd /var > find . | cpio -dmp /usr/test1 > > The result is /usr/test1 gets populated with the directory tree but > all the schg flags get stripped off. > > How can I keep the schg flags in the cloned directory? Did you copy under root? BSD cpio unlike GNU cpio does preserve file flags. $ cpio --version bsdcpio 2.8.4 -- libarchive 2.8.4 $ find /lib | sudo cpio -dmp test 56525 blocks $ ls -lo test/lib | awk '$5 != "-"' total 15595 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel schg 4440677 Sep 5 22:24 libc.so.7 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel schg 131655 Sep 5 22:24 libcrypt.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel schg 592241 Sep 5 22:24 libthr.so.3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 15:05:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C305106567D for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:05:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itmngr@cooperationireland.org) Received: from smtp2.irishbroadband.ie (smtp2.irishbroadband.ie [62.231.32.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9938FC1E for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cooperationireland.org ([62.231.53.178]) by smtp2.irishbroadband.ie with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1R0wt3-000P8M-JW; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:44:29 +0100 Received: from [199.107.2.100] ([199.107.2.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.cooperationireland.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p86EdV19018535; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:39:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from itmngr@cooperationireland.org) Message-Id: <077CA7AC-CEC6-4AFE-95C7-2596E2A359FD@cooperationireland.org> From: Michael Doyle To: Evan Busch In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:44:27 +0100 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-CoopIrl-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CoopIrl-MailScanner-ID: p86EdV19018535 X-CoopIrl-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CoopIrl-MailScanner-From: itmngr@cooperationireland.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Scan-Signature: 4b400336c46b3fafe09ad4ee87c1a7e1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A quality operating system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:05:41 -0000 Lots of other people have given good answers. I'm just chiming in on points 3 and 7 On 20 Aug 2011, at 05:47, Evan Busch wrote: > "What is a quality operating system?" I work as a database developer in an SME. I support end users on Mac OSX and Windows XP .. Windows Vista clients, and Windows 2008, FreeBSD and SuSE linux servers. Of these, the FreeBSD servers give least trouble. For non-techie users, usually but not always the OS X people have fewer problems. > In his view, and now mine, a quality operating system is reliable, > streamlined and clearly organized. That is hard to disagree with > > (3) Horrible documentation. > > This is my specialty and has been since the early 1980s. The FreeBSD > documentation is wordy, disorganized, inconsistent and highly > selective in what it mentions. It is not the product of professionals > but it also not the product of volunteers with a focus on > communication. It seems pro-forma, as in, "it's in the documentation, > so don't bother me." The web site compounds this error by pointing us > in multiple directions instead of to a singular resource. It is bad > enough that man pages are separate from your main documentation tree, > but now you have doubled or trebled the workload required of you > without any benefit to the end user. I personally find the documentation that comes as part of the install and the documentation on the FreeBSD website EASIER to use and more complete than any alternatives I use on a regular basis. > (7) Disorganized website. Again, what are you comparing it to? I can often find my way to exactly the information I am looking for on the FreeBSD site using the search tool and menu structure within that site. To search for answers about Windows server, Windows desktop or OSX problems, I tend to rely on external search engines (Bing, Google) to trawl through the sites, and it takes longer to find the answers I need Michael Doyle mdoyle@cooperationireland.org -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 16:07:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF83D106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66888FC0C for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:06:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=tAxUnQh6OkX3M8Vedt7phG+/n1bahAFOQN053YAoEkE=; b=RO0bL3O9gEMy9QF/Sd8jntnBU8ZmWdEF80t2VciJ7JoCoW8LEXD5BP8c0QVdWo5HpwwnPHe56kEix2YJ0XCYtc53rxWtlnV9yM3r77B2rdbHh2zKgXdJW1HmTvqcUxl3/4Ha49nZrqUt4tzuYu25NE6s2E1HrTJ65I9rv1xb0JY= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:49:17 -0700 Message-ID: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:49:04 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2011 15:49:17.0190 (UTC) FILETIME=[88C83A60:01CC6CAC] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: Subject: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:07:03 -0000 I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error. How do I fix this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 16:49:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21B8106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612B48FC0A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unhexhexium.infracaninophile.co.uk (unhexhexium.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p86GnWo8071980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:49:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p86GnWo8071980 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315327789; bh=hx7b2KhMTemP5nF/7LUoL22ma6rW0lhlKHK34OiLoEc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20T ue,=2006=20Sep=202011=2017:49:32=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.1)=20Gecko/2 0110830=20Thunderbird/6.0.1|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Fbsd8=20|CC:=20Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=2 0Re:=20wheel=20group=20&=20mkdir|References:=20<4E6640F0.5060902@a 1poweruser.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com>| X-Enigmail-Version:=201.3.1|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20 micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature "=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig476E60E257971FC4FEF0F71A" ; b=fmcci9dAZHSuBPDXLliuUnVkZ2uZXVdW2hvknpJoS3nHqR+9WYL/PFCJvfwi+Vflz Ad1Ui624V5wt2uJc+Rx6q1gISudAN0CTl3AmupVaNnW60Gi0svWGrd26K36+aXKV0W PJIPAZ9e4NETatGPG7khUkPh4D0q8s+UYNyr/Iwc= Message-ID: <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:49:32 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 References: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig476E60E257971FC4FEF0F71A" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:49:56 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig476E60E257971FC4FEF0F71A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote: > I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries t= o > issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error. >=20 > How do I fix this? Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a new subdirectory writable by group wheel. Either that, or teach your user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root. (Adding users to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.) Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig476E60E257971FC4FEF0F71A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5mTxwACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxmCwCfeTrJHsFRgpVVLz+c+m6lPSS3 FawAn2WMl57RtSxJQAnjgwvZnzbJi/K9 =Cwg9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig476E60E257971FC4FEF0F71A-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 17:02:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03D31065672 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Received: from msa.vap.navalradio.net (msa.vap.navalradio.net [201.236.67.148]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529508FC18 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.vap.navalradio.net (www.vap.navalradio.net [172.18.128.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa.vap.navalradio.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p86H3GMo052141; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:03:16 GMT (envelope-from mikhailg@webanoide.org) Message-ID: <37a5375d54158ec5977ecb4ea7b6b935.squirrel@www.vap.navalradio.net> In-Reply-To: <4E661E83.9050507@sentex.net> References: <8d457de47ed92550a511265436c183f9.squirrel@www.vap.navalradio.net> <4E657CEA.7080300@sentex.net> <4E661E83.9050507@sentex.net> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:03:16 -0300 From: "Mikhail Goriachev" To: "Mike Tancsa" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPsec phase 1 and 2 negotiation in an infinite loop. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:02:38 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 9/5/2011 11:58 PM, Mikhail Goriachev wrote: >> (p: #1 protoid=isakmp transform=1 >> (t: #1 id=ike (type=lifetype value=sec)(type=lifeduration >> value=7080)(type=enc value=3des)(type=auth >> value=preshared)(type=hash value=sha1)(type=group desc >> value=modp1024)))) >> (vid: len=16 afcad71372a1f1c96b8696fc99570100) >> 03:17:31.637424 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 50, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto >> UDP >> (17), length 108) >> w.x.y.z.500 > a.b.c.d.500: [udp sum ok] isakmp 1.0 msgid cookie ->: >> phase 1 R ident: >> (sa: doi=ipsec situation=identity >> (p: #1 protoid=isakmp transform=1 >> (t: #1 id=ike (type=lifetype value=sec)(type=lifeduration >> value=7080)(type=enc value=3des)(type=auth >> value=preshared)(type=hash value=sha1)(type=group desc >> value=modp1024)))) > > > OK, both sides are 3des, psk and sha1 dhgroup 1. Thats good. > >> >> Note: a.b.c.d is my end. w.x.y.z is the other end. "vid:", "ke:" and >> "nonce:" are scrambled. >> flag=0x8000, lorv=AES-CBC >> Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: encryption(aes) >> Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Hash Algorithm, flag=0x8000, >> lorv=MD5 >> Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: hash(md5) >> Sep 5 20:40:27 vpnmach racoon: DEBUG: type=Authentication Method, > > > ... yet, you have AES and md5 ?? where are those coming from ? Do you > have an extra config for the remote somewhere in your files perhaps that > is matching ? Nop. There're no extra files. The only thing the other guys gave me was: Operation Mode: Tunnel (Net to Net) Authentication Type: Pre shared secret Phase 1: 3DES/SHA1, DH Group=2 Phase 2: 3DES/SHA1, PFS=no, DH Group=any Based on that I got it working. So, do you reckon the other end suddenly began advertising/requesting aes and md5 instead of 3des and sha1? > ---Mike > >> remote w.x.y.z { >> exchange_mode main; >> proposal_check obey; >> >> proposal { >> encryption_algorithm 3des; >> hash_algorithm sha1; >> authentication_method pre_shared_key; >> dh_group modp1024; >> } >> } >> > > > > > -- > ------------------- > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net > Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net > Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ > -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Mobile: +56 9 78772741 Web: www.webanoide.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 18:00:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B171106566B for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7928FC19 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9456B3D174; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:00:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p86I0ckm002343; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:00:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:00:38 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Matthew Seaman Message-Id: <20110906200038.9d126df8.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Fbsd8 , Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:00:41 -0000 On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:49:32 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Either that, or teach your > user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root. (Adding users > to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is > the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.) Just an addition: In regards of what "sudo" does, see "super" (it's in the ports, same category as sudo). It allows a fine control over _what_ commands can be executed. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 18:30:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEC9106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B333A8FC1B for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id p86ITXEJ018955; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:29:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:29:33 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201109061829.p86ITXEJ018955@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com, Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> Cc: Subject: Re: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:30:12 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 6 11:07:48 2011 > Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:49:04 -0400 > From: Fbsd8 > To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Cc: > Subject: wheel group & mkdir > > I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to > issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error. > > How do I fix this? First, figure out _why_ the user is getting that error. exactly -what- executable named 'mkdir' are they trying to run? 'which mkdir' What are the permissions on that file *WHERE* are they trying to create the file, and what are the permissions on -that- directory? Note: Including the _exact_ error message is a GOOD IDEA(tm). There is a *SIGNIFICANT* difference between: $ mkdir foo mkdir: permission denied and $ mkdir foo mkdir: foo: permission denied From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 23:14:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0668106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6F18FC08 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:14:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=mQ+7klPxgyUQ5Q+pqCKQiqvfV5LO7+wwa+JTQ+ASp1Q=; b=ghLGlx3Rp8q9dvOilqV5fyk/YHsxma6DpD6BV26zXuw6EuTZEPtRquv2Zlyk4aXnYrjEkih/kUFjTL3Hww/SKMZJLwQqMnjVQCrI7Mrh5avbGGU0FgNhbdxlF57+UYFPQ4pUotGSpoadAEdY+J8lfoWrd7WYZXdjTD0DqraPHoE= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:14:21 -0700 Message-ID: <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:13:48 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2011 23:14:22.0056 (UTC) FILETIME=[B61F6680:01CC6CEA] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:14:26 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote: >> I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to >> issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error. >> >> How do I fix this? > > Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a > new subdirectory writable by group wheel. Either that, or teach your > user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root. (Adding users > to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is > the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.) > > Cheers, > > Matthew > Matthew Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group. I su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get su to work. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 23:42:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98F1106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3459E8FC08 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 10333008; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:42:57 -0400 Received: from [192.168.43.221] (account jon@radel.com HELO braeburn.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 10333002; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:42:42 -0400 Message-ID: <4E66AFF2.3040103@radel.com> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:42:42 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/3.1.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 References: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms070201050304030701020502" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:42:59 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070201050304030701020502 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9/6/11 7:13 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group. I s= u > and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get returned > to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command embedded= > still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man page to= > no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get su to wo= rk. Since you're the one having the issue you wish to have resolved, you=20 might want to take it upon yourself to tell us *exactly* what you're=20 typing, what the results are, and what you'd prefer to have happen=20 instead. We can guess what you're doing when you say "I su and get=20 prompted for the user id's password after which I get returned to the=20 command line," but given the root problem is that you don't fully=20 understand the su command, it's hard to be certain what you mean by that.= Going out on a limb, however, I'll point out that, when you're logged in = as fred su - fred doesn't do much for you as you remain fred, whereas, what was meant in=20 the suggestion to you was something more along the lines of su - which, if you enter root's password, leaves you as root. (Or gives you=20 a shell with root's privileges to be a bit more precise.) But, again, I'd suggest that this would go faster if you provide what=20 you're doing and what the results are rather than what you think you're=20 doing and what you think the results mean. To recap: Cut and paste what's actually happening, not your summary of sa= me. --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms070201050304030701020502-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 23:47:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933D7106566B for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from bsdevel2.freebsdnorth.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7:d77::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A0E8FC17 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maximum3.maximumdata.biz (akbeech-2-pt.tunnel.tserv14.sea1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:a:2e9::2]) by bsdevel2.freebsdnorth.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034FEC3B07 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:39:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:47:27 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-BETA2; KDE/4.6.5; i386; ; ) References: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109061547.28019.beech@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:47:30 -0000 On Tuesday 06 September 2011 15:13:48 Fbsd8 wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to > >> issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error. > >> > >> How do I fix this? > > > > Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a > > new subdirectory writable by group wheel. Either that, or teach your > > user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root. (Adding users > > to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is > > the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.) > > > > Cheers, > > > > Matthew > > Matthew > Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group. I > su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get > returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command > embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man > page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get > su to work. user# su Pass: root password root# Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - beech@FreeBSD.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 23:58:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970FC106564A for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:58:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBFA8FC0C for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:58:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=cQF4E9UtivQlkiBY3VCVoM+8GjCkfp8yMqSpujdyBoc=; b=ZWXlhrR9f3oZTf/Vn4nDHDR+hSKRuPHhGFOoeYbJHXl39KIL66MaAMZZj0BDylTdXw75v3To9tpPhX7Zl7dNvmb+yC9YX+1DV63YdDxN3Quxs+KKUm/Vm+fr8oIOP/iEIW3rCCM1nrJMUN7+fbpO63DnqAQKeMTjRgXVzOpDkOc= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:41:44 -0700 Message-ID: <4E66AFBC.4040501@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:41:48 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: h h References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2011 23:41:44.0938 (UTC) FILETIME=[895B4CA0:01CC6CEE] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: "Questions@Freebsd. Org" Subject: Re: cpio command and schg flags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:58:45 -0000 > >> I am trying to use this code sequence to clone a directory tree. >> mkdir /usr/test1 >> cd /var >> find . | cpio -dmp /usr/test1 >> >> The result is /usr/test1 gets populated with the directory tree but >> all the schg flags get stripped off. >> >> How can I keep the schg flags in the cloned directory? > > Did you copy under root? BSD cpio unlike GNU cpio does preserve file flags. > > $ cpio --version > bsdcpio 2.8.4 -- libarchive 2.8.4 > > $ find /lib | sudo cpio -dmp test > 56525 blocks > > $ ls -lo test/lib | awk '$5 != "-"' > total 15595 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel schg 4440677 Sep 5 22:24 libc.so.7 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel schg 131655 Sep 5 22:24 libcrypt.so.5 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel schg 592241 Sep 5 22:24 libthr.so.3 > I am running release 8.2 and $ cpio --version returns bsdcpio 2.7.0 -- libarchive 2.7.0 This version seems not to copy the schg flag maybe cpio got upgraded in release 9.0 which you must be running. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 00:19:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BED106564A for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:19:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A86C8FC15 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:19:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=PAkRb8DABcIW6WVu3xMBYpSQVmrQuyM9+9F8+/Qz4JY=; b=Uikq14G4Aqds5DkuIN4ThZJ25YBXFElVRWhmAOCFn1rABgQJ7xPQq90fc0Zzcl4fen+73G0MEnDLSQddcoztsXdpbENgnAtQBoLWtMmYN+//+HGeQSdXbSZC6X5BoIPpjLtA1UQt3noXa2Y7hLiiQteq7FsT4lebMJ5d9m1j6Mg= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:19:47 -0700 Message-ID: <4E66B8A7.2010401@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:19:51 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Beech Rintoul References: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> <201109061547.28019.beech@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201109061547.28019.beech@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2011 00:19:47.0913 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA1DA390:01CC6CF3] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:19:48 -0000 Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Tuesday 06 September 2011 15:13:48 Fbsd8 wrote: >> Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote: >>>> I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to >>>> issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error. >>>> >>>> How do I fix this? >>> Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a >>> new subdirectory writable by group wheel. Either that, or teach your >>> user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root. (Adding users >>> to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is >>> the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Matthew >> Matthew >> Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group. I >> su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get >> returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command >> embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man >> page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get >> su to work. > > user# su > Pass: root password > root# > > Beech > Thank you Beech. I was entering the password of the user. When I entered root's password the script containing mkdir worked. One remaining question. Is there any time limit on having root access? I mean will root access remain until the user exits? Thanks again From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 00:33:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F851065670 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@thorshammare.org) Received: from smtprelay-h21.telenor.se (smtprelay-h21.telenor.se [195.54.99.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355EA8FC0C for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipb4.telenor.se (ipb4.telenor.se [195.54.127.167]) by smtprelay-h21.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC58EABAF for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 02:07:45 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [83.227.225.121] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoZIAAy1Zk5T4+F5PGdsb2JhbABDmk6NOgsBAQEBNzOBRgEBAQEDAQEBBSAmCBgLDQMCFgIJFgIFBwMHGQ4BBQQIAwcDEQEBBAEHBwQBChIEh1QCuRmDXwUGgwAEhzyJYJMh X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,342,1312149600"; d="scan'208";a="1757830398" Received: from ua-83-227-225-121.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO odin.thorshammare.org) ([83.227.225.121]) by ipb4.telenor.se with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2011 02:07:44 +0200 Received: from Obah (obah.thorshammare.org [192.168.1.10]) by odin.thorshammare.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8707hCT030732; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 02:07:43 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hasse Hansson" To: "'Fbsd8'" , "'Matthew Seaman'" References: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 02:07:37 +0200 Message-ID: <000001cc6cf2$29dda9e0$7d98fda0$@org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acxs6uu76cv/5wtpRE+PKrRZhVg8wAABydbA Content-Language: sv X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at mailserver.thorshammare.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: SV: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:33:34 -0000 -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] P=E5 vegne af Fbsd8 Sendt: den 7 september 2011 01:14 Til: Matthew Seaman Cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Emne: Re: wheel group & mkdir Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote: >> I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries = to >> issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error. >> >> How do I fix this? >=20 > Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a > new subdirectory writable by group wheel. Either that, or teach your > user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root. (Adding users > to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is > the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.) >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 Matthew Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group. I=20 su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get=20 returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command=20 embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man = page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get=20 su to work. Thanks Hello. If I've got the correct impression of it, to be in the wheel group, able = you to su to root, meaning get root privilieges. BUT you have to know and use the root password. If you have installed the "sudo" port, which is very easy to config, = just by removing some "hash #" marks some common privilieges of the wheel group, = to obtain almost "root power" configurable by you. And also configuarable = is, if you like the group to use their own passwords or none, just belonging = to the wheel group, when issuing the sudo command. According to my humble understanding, just belonging to the wheel group without further configuration, don't get you much more.=20 /Hasse _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 00:36:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD44C1065670 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD8E8FC0A for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:36:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=3EbbiZaPg+rZagQ8CJz8c4aXov2/bQ/Tf9KVpE5e5wc=; b=YcMlBKu9IA6RdUZcfnqwoWIXFHG2yoQtNSzE16NwBFeGCQFMdMC+KYjd98Le2mtSwP6MzV04smJysHiXcs97Gc6+7PwZHuISXuKniFjXwLDF32gQjoz19E6BJ63SS5a9sM0ppfxKCvMGu9T+FkEGSq9NKSkO8VRoXcyzG6YjHDI= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:25:28 -0700 Message-ID: <4E66B9FC.7000905@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:25:32 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hasse Hansson References: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> <000001cc6cf2$29dda9e0$7d98fda0$@org> In-Reply-To: <000001cc6cf2$29dda9e0$7d98fda0$@org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2011 00:25:28.0620 (UTC) FILETIME=[A53166C0:01CC6CF4] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SV: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:36:48 -0000 Hasse Hansson wrote: > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] På vegne af Fbsd8 > Sendt: den 7 september 2011 01:14 > Til: Matthew Seaman > Cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Emne: Re: wheel group & mkdir > > Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote: >>> I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries to >>> issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error. >>> >>> How do I fix this? >> Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a >> new subdirectory writable by group wheel. Either that, or teach your >> user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root. (Adding users >> to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is >> the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> > > Matthew > Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group. > I > su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get > returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command > embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man > page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get > su to work. > > Thanks > > Hello. > > If I've got the correct impression of it, to be in the wheel group, able you > to su to root, meaning get root privilieges. > BUT you have to know and use the root password. > If you have installed the "sudo" port, which is very easy to config, just by > removing some "hash #" marks some common privilieges of the wheel group, to > obtain almost "root power" configurable by you. And also configuarable is, > if you like the group to use their own passwords or none, just belonging to > the wheel group, when issuing the sudo command. > According to my humble understanding, just belonging to the wheel group > without further configuration, don't get you much more. > > /Hasse > Thank you Hasse You gave me the solution. I was entering the password of the user and should have been entering the root password. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 00:42:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF2C1065672 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:42:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC15A8FC14 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywa17 with SMTP id 17so1080258ywa.13 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:42:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aEMLsRBbGgAN5FigGAq6vnCkp6y2YRdA54ZeALIuqLM=; b=DKWyYlAatDx9ayPvRtMIaq93K4eW/scdNtlM5SrVQ/B5QSnkmbnjISAP8fc7v+Pd3u EalahduMSfZbYiA9nqV+4ad/3XIhlHrOzuX7sVe0Qm+hHP15paI52ayBM6iizPDNn7qF 2dF2OxE8AuQ7EZ0lLPfK+e4kg39z0p33FbggU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.139.67 with SMTP id f3mr3143367icu.401.1315356160818; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:42:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.177.3 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:42:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110906013347.GE9801@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20110906013347.GE9801@dan.emsphone.com> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:42:40 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Dan Nelson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:42:42 -0000 On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Sep 05), Antonio Olivares said: >> Dear folks, >> >> sorry to bother you guys, but I am encountering a problem updating I >> need 4 ports only, but can't get past the error above: >> >> Building new INDEX files... done. >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: ca_root_nss-3.12.11_1 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: gtk-2.24.6 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: gtk-update-icon-cache-2.= 24.6 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D=3D=3D>>> New version available: firefox-6.0.1,1 >> =3D=3D=3D>>> 402 total installed ports >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =3D=3D=3D>>> 4 have new versions available >> grullahighschool# portmaster -a >> =3D=3D=3D> =A0License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE >> =3D=3D=3D> =A0Found saved configuration for ca_root_nss-3.12.9 >> =3D> nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/por= ts/distfiles//. >> =3D> Attempting to fetch =A0http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/secur= ity/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1= .87.tar.gz >> fetch: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_= 3_12_11_WITH_CKBI_1_87_RTM/src/nss-3.12.11.with.ckbi.1.87.tar.gz: No addres= s record > > This is your main problem; you aren't able to resolve ftp.mozilla.org for > some reason. =A0The other sites are mirrors that either aren't mirroring = the > security subdirectory, or haven't updated their mirror recently enough to > have a copy of that file. > >> I tried to get the file manually, but it does not exist. =A0Thanks for >> advice/suggestions/comments. > > It definitely does exist at the above url. =A0Since you seem to be having= DNS > issues, try putting > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A063.245.209.137 =A0ftp.mozilla.org > > in your /etc/hosts file and try fetching again, since that's what > ftp.mozilla.org currently resolves to. =A0Remember to remove the line aft= er > fetching, since the IP may change later. > > http://www.robtex.com/dns/ftp.mozilla.org#records > > -- Thank you very much Dan :) Adding the line to /etc/hosts does get the package and installs it. I am updated to latest. Appreciate the help. Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 01:17:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14696106566B for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 01:17:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B878FC08 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 01:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p871HQl0015126; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 02:17:27 +0100 Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (host-92-22-113-217.as13285.net [92.22.113.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p871HQIk015119; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 02:17:26 +0100 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EFE0833C1F; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 02:17:25 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 02:17:25 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20110907011725.GA70734@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <4E644637.1030500@pldrouin.net> <20110905143102.68a797fa.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64CC1D.90001@pldrouin.net> <20110905154358.187c9fba.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E64DAA6.60006@pldrouin.net> <20110905163623.98ebca0a.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110905163623.98ebca0a.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: Pierre-Luc Drouin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best Server OS for Someone That Does not Want to Touch a Shell on a Regular Basis? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 01:17:30 -0000 --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 04:36:23PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:20:22 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: > > How well does it work to use binary packages only to maintain a FreeBSD= =20 > > web server in general (I am thinking of package availability, but also= =20 > > and in particular as a quasi-automated updating tool)? >=20 > Quite well - as long as you're satisfied with the default > building options. You know that a binary package is a port, > compiled with the default set of options. This is okay in > most cases, but there may be situations where you explicitely > need to enable or disable a certain feature at compile time. >=20 > You also may encounter a situation where _no_ package is > available for a port (e. g. too many options, or licensing > restrictions). >=20 > This can be solved by portmaster which has an option to > go through all interactive configuration screens _before_ > starting any action. Those settings can be saved for the > next update run. >=20 > The portmaster program itself can be instructed to _use_ > binary packages (just as pkg_add -r would do) with the -P > and -PP options. In this case, binary packages will be > used as long as possible, and only those ports that > require building (as no package exists) will be compiled. > See "man portmaster" for details. >=20 > This is a good approach in combination with freebsd-update. > I have used that concept on some servers myself (especially > on smaller ones with low resources where compiling would > be too problematic). >=20 >=20 >=20 > > I noticed that in=20 > > the past few years, updating softwares through ports has been requiring= =20 > > more user intervention, due to the way some dependencies are being=20 > > updated from one version to the next. Would using binary packages allow= =20 > > to avoid more such user intervention? >=20 > Yes. All dependencies would be incorporated automatically. > Only ports without equivalent package that additionally have > OPTIONS to set would invoke a configuration screen, and this > screen would have to be dealt with only in the first run of > the updating process. >=20 > There are also options for portmaster that can be used to > control program behaviour in case of problems (e. g. some > package not found, conflicting ports, versioning problem, > or port marked "broken"). >=20 > Those solutions can also easily be scripted, e. g. check > one a week for possible updates and get the packages, but > do not install them automatically (which can be a security > requirement). If the list is approved, the updates will > be installed during night, creating a "fallback copy" just > in case something went wrong (e. g. malfunctioning new > software). Reports can be generated automatically and mailed > to the system administrator. >=20 > I would also suggest to frequently check the mailing lists > of the software in use for bugs and security updates that > might be interesting in terms of system security. This sould > be done for any "major server software" (Apache, PHP, MySQL > and the services utilizing those software, whatever you > want to run on the server). >=20 I'd recommend installing ports-mgmt/portaudit to keep an eye out on any vulnerabilities that require an update of the ports/packages. Personally, I'd go for ports rather than packages. As long as your friend reads /usr/ports/UPDATING and he uses either portupgrade or portmaster, he shouldn't go too far wrong. Also couldn't your friend give you a key for his server so that you can ssh into it and fix things if it goes wrong? Regards, --=20 Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk5mxiQACgkQHduKvUAgeK6yRACeKvw8VzHPe8EGTUr+8OVrFc18 cF4Ani31dTM+qW/u3oiM6mLce6l674U6 =WELW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 03:25:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D417106566B for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 03:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavierfreebsdquestions@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f178.google.com (mail-gx0-f178.google.com [209.85.161.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49658FC0A for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 03:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so5059692gxk.37 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:25:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+yX4nxq4YYfFMrg3N00QavaCzkz84LtbK9eDDlm6KA0=; b=pb/BBi/+buJLhwPeWI+o7n5VrOH78KewqaKmr11IEZoRiJ+C6LtYVBWIwlBjVg6Kji z6hHnqF1zARNZ2475DXXJtj4N0GUNc3tKp5FKKBOA5NbQrBgaEdH5a+mMsL0pGMNzW9K 8m13dBRZ7AB40QVyvlyK1at0YKk1unVNa6yDo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.168.135 with SMTP id w7mr4627329icy.288.1315365950421; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.223.65 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:25:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110906141936.GC61079@catflap.slightlystrange.org> References: <20110906141936.GC61079@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 05:25:50 +0200 Message-ID: From: Xavier FreeBSD questions To: Daniel Bye , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: fetchmail in "system-wide mode" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 03:25:52 -0000 On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:19:36PM +0100, Daniel Bye wrote: Hi Daniel, > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:10:50PM +0200, Xavier FreeBSD questions wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On the Internet there are some sites where they say to start fetchmail(1) in > > "system-wide" should put these two options in rc.conf(5) : > > > > fetchmail_enable="YES" > > fetchmail_polling_interval="60" > > This has worked for me in the past when I've needed fetchmail(1). > > > > > Although the second is optional and at first has little to do with this > > question because this question is addressed rather to the first option. > > > > I searched in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and rc.conf(5) manual and find no > > reference to these two options. > > This is to be expected. fetchmail(1) is a port, not part of the base system. > > > > > > I have them in my rc.conf(5) but fetchmail(1) does not start automatically. > > > > In /usr/src/UPDATING not found any reference to it. > > Again, what you'd expect. > > > > > Which is the correct way to start fetchmail(1) in "system-wide"? > > Is fetchmail installed on your system? If so, and you still can't get it to > start automatically, try this: > > # script fetchmail_startup sh -x /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fetchmail start > > You'll now have a file called `fetchmail_startup' which will contain a > record of exactly what the fetchmail rc script did as it executed, which may > or may not prove informative. > I paste the fetchmail_startup in: http://pastebin.com/vFqdhwfg For you, the answer of why don't worked for me fetchmail is lines 502 and 503 ? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 05:37:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40714106564A for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 05:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: from mailhost.ssr.com (mailhost.ssr.com [199.4.235.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE97C8FC12 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 05:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12346 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2011 05:32:36 -0000 Received: from pool-71-167-240-59.nycmny.east.verizon.net (HELO irelay.ssr.com) (sdb@71.167.240.59) by 199.4.235.5 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2011 05:32:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 45954 invoked by uid 103); 7 Sep 2011 05:22:43 -0000 Date: 7 Sep 2011 05:22:43 -0000 Message-ID: <20110907052243.45953.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> From: Scott Ballantyne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Can someone help me with Ghostscript9? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 05:37:23 -0000 Hello, Trying to build ghostscript9 it fails because it is unable to make ./obj/../soobj/ld.tr. I've looked in UPDATING and also googled, with no luck. I've appended the output from make at the end. Thanks in advance Scott gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02' ./obj/../soobj/genconf ./obj/../soobj/devs.tr -h /dev/stdout -p "%s&s&&" -pl "&-l%s&s&&" -pL "&-L%s&s&&" -ol ./obj/../soobj/ld.tr | awk 'BEGIN{j=0; p=1;} /jpeg_device/ {if(j++ > 0) p=0;} // {if(p==1) { print; } else { p=1 } }' > ./obj/../soobj/gconfxx.h Can't open /dev/stdout for output. ./obj/../soobj/echogs -a ./obj/../soobj/gconfxx.h rm -f ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.c rm -f ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.h cp ./obj/../soobj/gconfxx.h ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.h cp ./base/gconf.c ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.c cc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_HYPOT -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -DHAVE_LIBIDN -DHAVE_SETLOCALE -DHAVE_SSE2 -DHAVE_DBUS -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -g -fPIC -DUPD_SIGNAL=0 -I. -I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02/lcms/include -I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02/jasper/src/libjasper/include -I/usr/local/include/libpng -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -Wno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fno-builtin -fno-common -DHAVE_STDINT_H -DGX_COLOR_INDEX_TYPE="unsigned long int" -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DUSE_LIBICONV_GNU -DGS_DEVS_SHARED -DGS_DEVS_SHARED_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/ghostscript/9.02\" -fPIC -I./obj/../soobj -I./base -o ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.o -c ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.c ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.c:189: warning: no previous prototype for 'gs_lib_register_device' rm -f ./obj/../soobj/iconfig.c cp ./obj/../soobj/gconfxx.h ./obj/../soobj/gconfig.h cp ./psi/iconf.c ./obj/../soobj/iconfig.c cc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_HYPOT -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -DHAVE_LIBIDN -DHAVE_SETLOCALE -DHAVE_SSE2 -DHAVE_DBUS -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -g -fPIC -DUPD_SIGNAL=0 -I. -I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02/lcms/include -I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02/jasper/src/libjasper/include -I/usr/local/include/libpng -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -Wno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fno-builtin -fno-common -DHAVE_STDINT_H -DGX_COLOR_INDEX_TYPE="unsigned long int" -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DUSE_LIBICONV_GNU -DGS_DEVS_SHARED -DGS_DEVS_SHARED_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/ghostscript/9.02\" -I./psi -I./obj/../soobj -I./obj/../soobj -I./base -o ./obj/../soobj/iconfig.o -c ./obj/../soobj/iconfig.c ./obj/../soobj/echogs -w ./obj/../soobj/ldt.tr -n - cc -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -shared -Wl,-soname=libgs.so.9 -o ./bin/../sobin/libgs.so.9.02 ./obj/../soobj/echogs -a ./obj/../soobj/ldt.tr -n -s ./obj/../soobj/gsromfs0.o ./obj/../soobj/gs.o -s cat ./obj/../soobj/ld.tr >>./obj/../soobj/ldt.tr cat: ./obj/../soobj/ld.tr: No such file or directory gmake[1]: *** [bin/../sobin/libgs.so.9.02] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.02' gmake: *** [so] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 07:49:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F5C106566C for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 07:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089438FC0C for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 07:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from russet.local (reflex.squiz.co.uk [83.217.109.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p877neNJ064600 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:49:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p877neNJ064600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315381788; bh=0oIlksAthKKGIrN4JXmWmgFDeOL3DdS5HgvRj9JyhJg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E67220A.9030503@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20W ed,=2007=20Sep=202011=2008:49:30=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.1)=20Gecko/2 0110830=20Thunderbird/6.0.1|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Fbsd8=20|CC:=20Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=2 0Re:=20wheel=20group=20&=20mkdir|References:=20<4E6640F0.5060902@a 1poweruser.com>=20<4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20<4E6 6A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<4E66A92C.8030406@a1 poweruser.com>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.3.1|Content-Type:=20multipa rt/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"applicatio n/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig4EF6460595 BEFDCD16C7274B"; b=ZbJzT7ziiYCalNkIJG6G6uUobf1PMA+BJ8rnv5TY1ioOo7bzZiihTlQ6DM7Y7Xnr2 M/H3qGLpcv7I14RNJ5tqfmP6MIhrzr7sI9EBu8brOxFG3Y2ZAcO5gYXOaJnxjkbYVQ zGhJPGXTSfWKsMDVah4603Wo9pahuElfr2gWEcvk= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host reflex.squiz.co.uk [83.217.109.164] claimed to be russet.local Message-ID: <4E67220A.9030503@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:49:30 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 References: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4EF6460595BEFDCD16C7274B" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 07:49:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4EF6460595BEFDCD16C7274B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/09/2011 00:13, Fbsd8 wrote: > Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group.= > I su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get > returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command= > embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su ma= n > page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get > su to work. With su(1), you need to give the root password to get rootly powers. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig4EF6460595BEFDCD16C7274B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5nIhQACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzQIwCfW1uYU2zBiU1MI5hbcTBYnzcn QWMAn2f7H76uekSs5Eb+kT02urMQIlVc =jFE9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4EF6460595BEFDCD16C7274B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 07:55:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C47B1065673 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 07:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from hp9.esiee.fr (hp9.esiee.fr [147.215.1.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB7A8FC19 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 07:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by hp9.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D74B14E9AFC for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:39:47 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.1 hp9.esiee.fr 0D74B14E9AFC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=esiee.fr; s=MAILOUT; t=1315381187; bh=q31Xu6PXrsrhMZEf7u/bICpIFK6OkdWTv7JpmxwtltE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UJfuAFFLTpaZl5dn9Ep0WTxmPMIkP9uWqaHkIFGSN/l9dusUO5FVNh9mBLxE1bcnG MLVXaEU6D4QeI02ZpWvXs+P6RlQaJKMxO4wEuST57ip0FnHlkfxvTRgX16Y/ddYU1G qgyMlf2dsm80aR/qdGpbCz7fMyy0GIAst/hvH3ms= Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VAMS.dummy (Postfix) with SMTP id E75BC3C3CB4 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:39:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81C33C3CAC for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:39:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5C5BEB0D2 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:39:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E671FC2.4060901@esiee.fr> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:39:46 +0200 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110831 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: unable to install php5-ldap port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 07:55:16 -0000 Hello I'm trying to install php5-ldap from ports and I'm facing to a strange error : ldap3# cd php5-ldap ldap3# make config ===> No options to configure ldap3# make ===> php5-ldap-5.3.8 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/phpize - found ===> php5-ldap-5.3.8 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.68 - found ===> php5-ldap-5.3.8 depends on shared library: ldap-2.4.8 - found ===> PHPizing for php5-ldap-5.3.8 Configuring for: PHP Api Version: 20090626 Zend Module Api No: 20090626 Zend Extension Api No: 220090626 autoconf: required version 2.68 not found *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/php5-ldap. ldap3# autoconf -v autoconf-2.68: error: no input file As you can see the autoconf version is OK , anyone understand what happen ? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 10:06:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391B8106566C for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:06:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9B18FC12 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so4465310qyk.13 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 03:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.10.17 with SMTP id n17mr4708738qan.218.1315389973669; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 03:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-105-057.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.105.57]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dv6sm2036590qab.13.2011.09.07.03.06.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Sep 2011 03:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Rv0mz0Y1Kz2CG5k for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 06:06:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 06:06:10 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110907060610.7053d809@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4E66AFBC.4040501@a1poweruser.com> References: <4E66AFBC.4040501@a1poweruser.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: cpio command and schg flags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:06:15 -0000 On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:41:48 -0400 Fbsd8 articulated: > I am running release 8.2 and > $ cpio --version returns > bsdcpio 2.7.0 -- libarchive 2.7.0 > > This version seems not to copy the schg flag > > maybe cpio got upgraded in release 9.0 which you must be running. $ uname -rm 8.2-STABLE amd64 $ cpio --version bsdcpio 2.8.4 -- libarchive 2.8.4 -- Jerry ✌ jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 13:03:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEEB106564A for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from richard@blueapex.co.uk) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CD58FC13 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.34] (brian.firebadger.net [82.69.4.157]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LnBin-1RfrCM12NB-00hAU0; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:03:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4E676B86.6020602@blueapex.co.uk> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:03:02 +0100 From: Richard Collyer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110830 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> <4E664F1C.5050702@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4E66A92C.8030406@a1poweruser.com> <201109061547.28019.beech@freebsd.org> <4E66B8A7.2010401@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <4E66B8A7.2010401@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Ff2p0o5yFBg809v1ONQwXMPl5CmXR0ig7vDvnkVtRen 5meTvJQGeu+Dt5D9xPf+m179IhwjcNljyy1AhZhBCYPlBWrcfe /Se3itU/LX+LICTZzLes1W2ECa+o2CjtVNmLSmymyb+x5dfovs NTKpMgWqxDLw6himjK1Jddk4zwYsXJSIcsT4AUfCG0z6FvG1lr RYmSwt5miBtdA9fANhk0qMMEaAttbw1nrKsjs7sAmLyl5TSRI4 rQnthr9AIC1hPQNM8QNQLUWTjNfXuHezv9DIRRB4FcvwcTuZ30 vlqECRLD8bchDjoc5uKtugQ7tlhXYLvFnmKitfjDUJaoudk1da 8yVrqVa+UnJjW1gqfflU= Subject: Re: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:03:04 -0000 On 07/09/2011 01:19, Fbsd8 wrote: > Thank you Beech. > I was entering the password of the user. > When I entered root's password the script containing mkdir worked. > > One remaining question. Is there any time limit on having root access? > I mean will root access remain until the user exits? > > Thanks again > No, once a users SSH session times out/is closed the root provledges are lost and you have to SU again. If they remain logged in they keep root privlidges (sp!) until they log out. Richard -- Richard Collyer Blue Apex Ltd 07900 997 380 Registered as a company in England and Wales (Reg Number: 05982514). Registered Address: 42 King Richards Hill, Earl Shilton, Leicester, LE9 7EY __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6442 (20110906) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 13:33:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AD4106566B for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:33:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nospam@ofloo.net) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E088FC1C for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R1HwT-0008M2-H7 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 06:13:25 -0700 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 06:13:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Ofloo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1315401205523-4778460.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Hellanzb, segmentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:33:16 -0000 For some reason, hellanzb keeps segmentating whenever it is processing something, .. now i was wondering how i could debug it, .. cause nothing other then except segmentation doesn't show up anywhere. So at least i can find out what is going on, .. I=E2=80=99m using python2.7, .. and the latest hellanzb from FreeBSD8.2 por= ts tree. Regards, .. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Hellanzb= -segmentation-tp4778460p4778460.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 14:58:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BF21065676 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wowselim@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de (fmmailgate02.web.de [217.72.192.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1168FC17 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp04.web.de ( [172.20.0.225]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790351AA72A32 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:43:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [84.58.12.78] (helo=[192.168.2.112]) by smtp04.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.110 #2) id 1R1JLt-000599-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:43:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4E67831D.6040205@web.de> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:43:41 +0200 From: Selim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: wowselim@web.de X-Sender: wowselim@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19PGJ305t3wStohIcvRC61EUkZQpVbaDSGN9iGx VSgfv+4Pg1lI1cgy4IG4Bhmj8aBY8dEffpSkck5YZGb1BVFqtc za4qxVR+M= X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:00:26 +0000 Cc: Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:58:57 -0000 hey could you please include broadcom bcm4313 drivers to freebsd9.0 i cant use freebsd just because of that driver.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 17:51:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE94106564A for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from bsdevel2.freebsdnorth.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7:d77::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A2F8FC15 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maximum3.maximumdata.biz (akbeech-2-pt.tunnel.tserv14.sea1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:a:2e9::2]) by bsdevel2.freebsdnorth.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F76C3B07; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:43:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD To: Fbsd8 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:51:10 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-BETA2; KDE/4.6.5; i386; ; ) References: <4E6640F0.5060902@a1poweruser.com> <201109061547.28019.beech@freebsd.org> <4E66B8A7.2010401@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <4E66B8A7.2010401@a1poweruser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109070951.10456.beech@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wheel group & mkdir X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:51:13 -0000 On Tuesday 06 September 2011 16:19:51 Fbsd8 wrote: > Beech Rintoul wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 September 2011 15:13:48 Fbsd8 wrote: > >> Matthew Seaman wrote: > >>> On 06/09/2011 16:49, Fbsd8 wrote: > >>>> I have a user that belongs to the wheel group but when the user tries > >>>> to issue mkdir command it gets a permission denied error. > >>>> > >>>> How do I fix this? > >>> > >>> Make the directory that contains where your user is trying to create a > >>> new subdirectory writable by group wheel. Either that, or teach your > >>> user to use su(1) or sudo(1) so they can mkdir as root. (Adding users > >>> to group wheel so they are permitted to run su(1) is a BSD-ism, and is > >>> the usual reason for adding anyone to wheel.) > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> Matthew > >> > >> Matthew > >> > >> Thanks for your reply. I have a user id that is in the wheel group. I > >> > >> su and get prompted for the user id's password after which I get > >> returned to the command line. Running the script with the mkdir command > >> embedded still returns Permission Denied message. I have read the su man > >> page to no joy. Could you please explain the sequence of events to get > >> su to work. > > > > user# su > > Pass: root password > > root# > > > > Beech > > Thank you Beech. > I was entering the password of the user. > When I entered root's password the script containing mkdir worked. > > One remaining question. Is there any time limit on having root access? > I mean will root access remain until the user exits? Yes, the shell will remain root until you either logout (it will go back to user) or close the shell. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - beech@FreeBSD.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 19:54:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE4A106566B for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:54:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@musl.org) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EB88FC12 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yib19 with SMTP id 19so19576yib.13 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:54:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.146.106.33 with SMTP id e33mr89657yac.8.1315423739689; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:28:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.169.13 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:28:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E67831D.6040205@web.de> References: <4E67831D.6040205@web.de> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:28:59 -0700 Message-ID: From: Mike Hix To: Selim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:54:39 -0000 On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Selim wrote: > hey > could you please include broadcom bcm4313 drivers to freebsd9.0 > i cant use freebsd just because of that driver.. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > hey could you have a look at the man pages for bwn and bwi... -- Mike Hix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 19:56:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E151065675 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:56:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@musl.org) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5978FC20 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yib19 with SMTP id 19so21145yib.13 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:56:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.147.133.8 with SMTP id k8mr550621yan.3.1315425369118; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.169.13 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:56:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E67C6BA.7040204@web.de> References: <4E67831D.6040205@web.de> <4E67C6BA.7040204@web.de> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:56:09 -0700 Message-ID: From: Mike Hix To: Selim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:56:10 -0000 On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Selim wrote: > Am 07.09.2011 21:28, schrieb Mike Hix: > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Selim wrote: > >> hey >> could you please include broadcom bcm4313 drivers to freebsd9.0 >> i cant use freebsd just because of that driver.. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > hey > could you have a look at the man pages for bwn and bwi... > > -- > Mike Hix > > bwn and bwi have no support for bcm43*13* > At least you read them. :) Just in case you've got the bcm43xx number incorrect, what happens when you load the bwn or bwi module and it's dependencies? -- Mike Hix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 20:07:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD4C106564A for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:07:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@musl.org) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CFA8FC0C for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yib19 with SMTP id 19so32132yib.13 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:07:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.146.106.33 with SMTP id e33mr120229yac.8.1315426029893; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:07:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.169.13 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:07:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E67CD19.4050303@web.de> References: <4E67831D.6040205@web.de> <4E67C6BA.7040204@web.de> <4E67CD19.4050303@web.de> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:07:09 -0700 Message-ID: From: Mike Hix To: Selim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:07:11 -0000 On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Selim wrote: > Am 07.09.2011 21:56, schrieb Mike Hix: > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Selim wrote: > >> Am 07.09.2011 21:28, schrieb Mike Hix: >> >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Selim wrote: >> >>> hey >>> could you please include broadcom bcm4313 drivers to freebsd9.0 >>> i cant use freebsd just because of that driver.. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> hey >> could you have a look at the man pages for bwn and bwi... >> >> -- >> Mike Hix >> >> bwn and bwi have no support for bcm43*13* >> > > At least you read them. :) > > Just in case you've got the bcm43xx number incorrect, what happens when you > load the bwn or bwi module and it's dependencies? > > -- > Mike Hix > > i dont want to waste dvds (maybe sounds like its not important for me but > thats the only reason i cannot use freebsd) it also did not work with the > linux drivers supporting other cards except 4313 so i dont think that this > will work with freebsd but maybe ill try this with a usb image then.. so > could you tell me if there will be support for this card in fbsd9.0? or is > there already support in beta release? > Unfortunately I cannot answer your question about future support for that chipset. -- Mike Hix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 20:30:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED3E1065674 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (client-82-26-127-91.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [82.26.127.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DF88FC19 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1R1Old-0005ao-Cn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:30:41 +0100 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:30:41 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110907203041.GD61079@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110906141936.GC61079@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: fetchmail in "system-wide mode" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:30:43 -0000 --jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:25:50AM +0200, Xavier FreeBSD questions wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:19:36PM +0100, Daniel Bye wrote:=20 > I paste the fetchmail_startup in: http://pastebin.com/vFqdhwfg >=20 > For you, the answer of why don't worked for me fetchmail is lines 502 and > 503 ? Looks like a permissions problem on the fetchmail config file, /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc. What do you get when you run $ ls -l /usr/local/etc/fetchmail* ?=20 I have just freshly installed fetchmail on a new system, and I see this: -rw------- 1 fetchmail fetchmail 130 7 Sep 21:24 - /usr/local/etc/fetc= hmailrc -rw-r--r-- 1 fetchmail fetchmail 130 7 Sep 21:24 - /usr/local/etc/fetc= hmailrc.sample If you see something different, try setting the permissions and ownership to what you see here, or try reinstalling the port. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk5n1HEACgkQixf5fBYiFmrmQACgiHg29gUIQnBQwkTiZzcM3epZ AjIAn0rDHOxhVicWcCXwSjzsnmX2jvsm =NwXI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 21:17:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15040106566C for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:17:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavierfreebsdquestions@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E508FC14 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yib19 with SMTP id 19so98705yib.13 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:17:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6oLh5JXlMUkHwCnmZaAwfM1e1F1SvxiJRmCYCgk9BRI=; b=nQTxCoNVMmOkc54KISytgvK9BHAVe38GjXx6AC2SllOKXdXYGvEz0ny/X42j7VIG9k Q2XrJ4clbi3CJWZNR9t7B2z3gSN4x35cPWoA+cSmN86/aJqvb5zBsIthqxmYqm6w6lCw BgEjXS2W1IZ63EuWbJtkd+f3wltDAHboy+ego= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.157.134 with SMTP id d6mr2793531icx.355.1315430235914; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.223.65 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:17:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110907203041.GD61079@catflap.slightlystrange.org> References: <20110906141936.GC61079@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <20110907203041.GD61079@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:17:15 +0200 Message-ID: From: Xavier FreeBSD questions To: Daniel Bye , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: fetchmail in "system-wide mode" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:17:17 -0000 2011/9/7 Daniel Bye Hi Daniel, On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:25:50AM +0200, Xavier FreeBSD questions wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:19:36PM +0100, Daniel Bye wrote: > > I paste the fetchmail_startup in: http://pastebin.com/vFqdhwfg > > > > For you, the answer of why don't worked for me fetchmail is lines 502 and > > 503 ? > > Looks like a permissions problem on the fetchmail config file, > /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc. What do you get when you run > > $ ls -l /usr/local/etc/fetchmail* > > ? > > I have just freshly installed fetchmail on a new system, and I see this: > > -rw------- 1 fetchmail fetchmail 130 7 Sep 21:24 - > /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc > -rw-r--r-- 1 fetchmail fetchmail 130 7 Sep 21:24 - > /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc.sample > > If you see something different, try setting the permissions and ownership > to > what you see here, or try reinstalling the port. > > I don't have the /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc because I use a user local file. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 23:59:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AB9106566B for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410A48FC19 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:59:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=JHWkm9lq85802ajBj4/qTV3iFr8oOefE2pwGos2rHeA=; b=XaPpeUSTXtF+SQmOtiPxiSXyYVIjlfrXadIOGYjo8nMXvCueq2LVAWvDD2YDio2ze9a3i4Tj1fa96Hhq2H0jZ/kRQPtb8ZAU8/3ipw7tP9giMWdLVLF6Q5w9o+G7WPmmLgg8R/Zyj+7mCbauPfongdMtDoDo6nM2IlsUYI2WAIA= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:59:07 -0700 Message-ID: <4E680549.704@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:59:05 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2011 23:59:07.0590 (UTC) FILETIME=[213D1E60:01CC6DBA] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: Subject: get rel 9.0 iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 23:59:07 -0000 What is the ftp url to fetch the most current release 9.0 .iso file? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 00:09:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5441065687 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113508FC08 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CE31E49F; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 02:09:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p8809YqZ041012; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 02:09:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 02:09:34 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Message-Id: <20110908020934.6158bfe7.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4E680549.704@a1poweruser.com> References: <4E680549.704@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: get rel 9.0 iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:09:37 -0000 On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:59:05 -0400, Fbsd8 wrote: > What is the ftp url to fetch the most current release 9.0 .iso file? FreeBSD-9.0 hasn't been released yet. In order to obtain a current snapshot, check the FTP server: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/201107/ You'll find FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201107-ia64-bootonly.iso and FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201107-ia64-release.iso here, as well as a memory stick image. In ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/201105/ you'll also find ISO images for amd64 and i386 architectures. The current releases can be found on the FTP server at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBS/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGE/ and ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/ as well as ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/ and ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-amd64/ respectively. Those are the releases. The current one is 8.2. For details, see: http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/relnotes/index.html -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 00:26:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7038106564A for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f49.google.com (mail-gw0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8878FC0A for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so308034gwb.36 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:26:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SGzKxFA0qIrZsof9poXosbAjQrNYdjnPbZf2BpcNWo4=; b=PuSIO+0UUH3m7+tvpXBV9MHVxp4r9oS/GivrtzLYD8CXwATv41pJeNZ2qJO8xG6YyU VxrwQipNCSAv7THWwBbYzUyDYtce38b+I/6lqLKQ3pWLCD1LQ5PRGseQZofCkliH8Wqt GIRB3L0N6pb8NjNiwkIMRNTfxw0F4SfuyCQhs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.103.99 with SMTP id e63mr262787yhg.1.1315440235349; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.157.202 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:03:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E680549.704@a1poweruser.com> References: <4E680549.704@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:03:55 -0700 Message-ID: From: pete wright To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: get rel 9.0 iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:26:50 -0000 On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > What is the ftp url to fetch the most current release 9.0 .iso file? 9.0-RELEASE is not available yet. 9.0-BETA2 has been annouced today though: http://www.freebsd.org/where.html#helptest this will also be available on mirrors shortly... -pete -- pete wright www.nycbug.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 00:38:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E531065670 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (client-82-26-127-91.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [82.26.127.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A918FC0A for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1R1SdR-0006KV-9d for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 01:38:29 +0100 Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 01:38:29 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110908003829.GG61079@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110906141936.GC61079@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <20110907203041.GD61079@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V32M1hWVjliPHW+c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: fetchmail in "system-wide mode" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:38:30 -0000 --V32M1hWVjliPHW+c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:17:15PM +0200, Xavier FreeBSD questions wrote: > 2011/9/7 Daniel Bye >=20 > Hi Daniel, >=20 > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:25:50AM +0200, Xavier FreeBSD questions wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:19:36PM +0100, Daniel Bye wrote: > > > I paste the fetchmail_startup in: http://pastebin.com/vFqdhwfg > > > > > > For you, the answer of why don't worked for me fetchmail is lines 502= and > > > 503 ? > > > > Looks like a permissions problem on the fetchmail config file, > > /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc. What do you get when you run > > > > $ ls -l /usr/local/etc/fetchmail* > > > > ? > > > > I have just freshly installed fetchmail on a new system, and I see this: > > > > -rw------- 1 fetchmail fetchmail 130 7 Sep 21:24 - > > /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc > > -rw-r--r-- 1 fetchmail fetchmail 130 7 Sep 21:24 - > > /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc.sample > > > > If you see something different, try setting the permissions and ownersh= ip > > to > > what you see here, or try reinstalling the port. > > > > > I don't have the /usr/local/etc/fetchmailrc because I use a user local fi= le. Well, there you go, then. The system global operation requires that file. You'll need to run per-user daemons, which can be set up by following the instructions in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fetchmail. In particular, pay attention to `fetchmail_users'. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --V32M1hWVjliPHW+c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk5oDoUACgkQixf5fBYiFmpzpwCg2x04nYBM8zeKNP5l9bIWhrTO pOkAn35Ey6GUbCdPyYDOff0Ow5Jmwakf =V0RK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V32M1hWVjliPHW+c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 00:43:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6DA106566C for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:43:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234888FC0C for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:43:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=30dZvRY7eGO9TswE4qdNp75K8v/fyxsxlFS7XKCQxuI=; b=N1AP0W6onOQb/b5DbocKPvjfC7PAACT34Br7XvS/TJdxEVr25GiO+mFmgE05gWf21egqsqdiS5ZRdiItcsq8bd/cC+ZfnDGins/Vwt/2PAljk6CGShk6yJXzhdJkN7By2nahqcqITWmyMQjzz1XoGzv9lDoR5kSElycWQ/9ha1I= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:43:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4E680FC3.9020905@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:43:47 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <4E680549.704@a1poweruser.com> <20110908020934.6158bfe7.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110908020934.6158bfe7.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2011 00:43:50.0322 (UTC) FILETIME=[60458920:01CC6DC0] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: nomadlogic@gmail.com, "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: get rel 9.0 iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:43:50 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:59:05 -0400, Fbsd8 wrote: >> What is the ftp url to fetch the most current release 9.0 .iso file? > > FreeBSD-9.0 hasn't been released yet. In order to obtain > a current snapshot, check the FTP server: > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/201107/ > > You'll find FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201107-ia64-bootonly.iso > and FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201107-ia64-release.iso here, as > well as a memory stick image. > > In ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/201105/ > you'll also find ISO images for amd64 and i386 architectures. > > The current releases can be found on the FTP server at > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBS/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGE/ > and ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/ > as well as ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/ > and ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-amd64/ > respectively. Those are the releases. The current one is 8.2. > > For details, see: > http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/relnotes/index.html > > > No rel 9.0 i386 disc1.iso anywhere. My pc can not boot from memstick. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 00:49:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09111065673 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41EF8FC14 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF28E1E247; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 02:49:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p880nrPr056113; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 02:49:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 02:49:53 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Message-Id: <20110908024953.493f1af6.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4E680FC3.9020905@a1poweruser.com> References: <4E680549.704@a1poweruser.com> <20110908020934.6158bfe7.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E680FC3.9020905@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: get rel 9.0 iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:49:55 -0000 On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:43:47 -0400, Fbsd8 wrote: > No rel 9.0 i386 disc1.iso anywhere. My pc can not boot from memstick. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/9.0/ ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/i386/ISO-IMAGES/9.0/ A FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2-{i386|amd64}-bootonly.iso and FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2-{i386|amd64}-dvd1.iso are available. Note that this is "just" a BETA, _not_ a RELEASE. If your system can boot at least from CD, the bootonly should be fine (if you can then continue installation via Internet); if you don't have a machine connected, the DVD #1 will be a good tool (as a DVD-capable drive should be assumed as common equipment today). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 07:22:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56742106566B for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 07:22:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5D228FC1D for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 07:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Sep 2011 06:55:37 -0000 Received: from d134149.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO FBSD.lokilan) [80.171.134.149] by mail.gmx.net (mp041) with SMTP; 08 Sep 2011 08:55:37 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18tIkAwnAYtgoqQXygjlTSCTipat2e2cujVoaxckA A+spwM7xmOK2Rp Message-ID: <4E6866E7.7050301@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:55:35 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110801 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E67831D.6040205@web.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Selim , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:22:20 -0000 On 09/07/11 21:28, Mike Hix wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Selim wrote: > >> hey >> could you please include broadcom bcm4313 drivers to freebsd9.0 >> i cant use freebsd just because of that driver.. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > hey > could you have a look at the man pages for bwn and bwi... > When Adriane have time, he will work on it. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless/2011-August/000448.html I don't know, if he had worked on it. Sorry for my english :( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 10:44:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35251065670 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:44:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net) Received: from fmailhost06.isp.att.net (fmailhost06.isp.att.net [204.127.217.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FA18FC0A for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:31:57 +0000 (GMT) X-Comment: Sending client does not conform to RFC822 minimum requirements X-Comment: Date has been added by Maillennium Received: from localhost (adsl-68-210-187-124.sdf.bellsouth.net[68.210.187.124]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc06) with SMTP id <20110908103151H0600a7emre>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:31:57 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.210.187.124] From: "Thomas Mueller" Cc: Fbsd8 , Polytropon Subject: Re: get rel 9.0 iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:44:32 -0000 > On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:43:47 -0400, Fbsd8 wrote: > > No rel 9.0 i386 disc1.iso anywhere. My pc can not boot from memstick. Polytropon responded: > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/9.0/ > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/i386/ISO-IMAGES/9.0/ > A FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2-{i386|amd64}-bootonly.iso and > FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2-{i386|amd64}-dvd1.iso are available. > Note that this is "just" a BETA, _not_ a RELEASE. > If your system can boot at least from CD, the bootonly should > be fine (if you can then continue installation via Internet); > if you don't have a machine connected, the DVD #1 will be a > good tool (as a DVD-capable drive should be assumed as common > equipment today). Is that pc that can't boot from memstick old? I have an old PC, dating to July 2001, that can't boot directly from USB, but can boot from USB with the help of Plop (http://www.plop.at/) boot manager. I think dvd1.iso was < 700 MB and would therefore fit on a CD? My computer from July 2001 had CD-RW but no DVD. This was one of the factors pushing me to buy parts for a new computer. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 17:17:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA126106566C for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:17:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steven.e.friedrich@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f50.google.com (mail-vw0-f50.google.com [209.85.212.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8042D8FC15 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws14 with SMTP id 14so159295vws.37 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:17:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KVsywNiEhjL+DAM7Eg0QXpB8fY0HPqZhGDXdMw2icl0=; b=ImK2oG5oQRPu5Hmmu98AHtKeDSbVa9LRXSlCQ3ZD6FlDqNrYolXZ3c4qo9gJwyAZ1X fBmvT0Hl/Yrne4gCx1qNNswlDmnZ2Oix0nLmT/KjXtwT0F30p5Strex3NGC9wFqZXj6l WNYO822XlnmGpyFvWbmrBCQVTT9GKYXTtBrUE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.89.99 with SMTP id bn3mr999325vdb.343.1315502272626; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.168.230 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:17:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E67831D.6040205@web.de> <4E67C6BA.7040204@web.de> <4E67CD19.4050303@web.de> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:17:52 -0400 Message-ID: From: Steven Friedrich To: Mike Hix Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Selim , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:17:53 -0000 On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Mike Hix wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Selim wrote: > > > Am 07.09.2011 21:56, schrieb Mike Hix: > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Selim wrote: > > > >> Am 07.09.2011 21:28, schrieb Mike Hix: > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Selim wrote: > >> > >>> hey > >>> could you please include broadcom bcm4313 drivers to freebsd9.0 > >>> i cant use freebsd just because of that driver.. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> > >> > >> hey > >> could you have a look at the man pages for bwn and bwi... > >> > >> -- > >> Mike Hix > >> > >> bwn and bwi have no support for bcm43*13* > >> > > > > At least you read them. :) > > > > Just in case you've got the bcm43xx number incorrect, what happens when > you > > load the bwn or bwi module and it's dependencies? > > > > -- > > Mike Hix > > > > i dont want to waste dvds (maybe sounds like its not important for me > but > > thats the only reason i cannot use freebsd) it also did not work with the > > linux drivers supporting other cards except 4313 so i dont think that > this > > will work with freebsd but maybe ill try this with a usb image then.. so > > could you tell me if there will be support for this card in fbsd9.0? or > is > > there already support in beta release? > > > > Unfortunately I cannot answer your question about future support for that > chipset. > > -- > Mike Hix > Perhaps you could burn FreeBSD9 BETA2 on a RW media and try it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 19:59:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABEC106564A for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4EC18FC12 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:59:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=WS3CjfMqDtIEXVzzwMKWRr4094rEGyd6JiRD5SDk+B4=; b=FaClRxPnGI92FOGktWoa2VWZOoM1CMkdbfZINHQdyqeZz4CddbTHEk2mF7HrRtaz2XXSoTTSOozpifD+JrwGiJCXz9pzgpik5A16njJFaeTRkBi/RRXFYpd66jRxqtsAUozOBojRRBWv9lAzd0sqyhjNNQRr3GlJK8uLTDlJzZQ= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 8 Sep 2011 12:59:07 -0700 Message-ID: <4E691E88.1000502@a1poweruser.com> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:59:04 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2011 19:59:07.0797 (UTC) FILETIME=[C4B4D450:01CC6E61] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: Subject: rel 9.0 i386 boot hangup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:59:08 -0000 I installed 9.0 using the bootonly cd over the net. The new keymap function is causing problems. What are the steps to boot into single user mode so I can edit rc.conf and change the keymap= to different one. Is the procedure documented in the handbook? If so I was not able to locate it. Also want to know what is the keymap defaulted to by previous releases. That is the one I want. I have standard 101 keyboard. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 20:11:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F614106564A for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 20:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out7.libero.it (cp-out7.libero.it [212.52.84.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1745F8FC08 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 20:11:56 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0207.4E69218A.0106,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1555 Received: from soth.ventu (151.41.235.47) by cp-out7.libero.it (8.5.133) id 4E68B6BF0012AD4E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 22:11:54 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p88KBe4d057681 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 22:11:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4E69217C.5000306@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:11:40 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110908 Thunderbird/3.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 10.1.2.13 Subject: Help with crash dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:11:56 -0000 Hello. Anyone can give any hint on this? I really have no clue. bye & Thanks av. > # uname -a > FreeBSD xxxxx.xxxxxxxx.it 7.3-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p4 #1: Wed Dec 15 11:53:13 CET 2010 root@xxxxx.xxxxxxxx.it:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxxxx i386 > # kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.17 > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. > Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. > This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"... > > Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: > panic: ffs_write: dir write > cpuid = 3 > Uptime: 26d9h4m27s > Physical memory: 2033 MB > Dumping 300 MB: 285 269 253 237 221 205 189 173 157 141 125 109 93 77kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 3; apic id = 03 > fault virtual address = 0x14 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc059accb > stack pointer = 0x28:0xc0c20ccc > frame pointer = 0x28:0xc0c20cec > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 0 (swapper) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 3 > 61 45 29 13 > > Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/splash_bmp.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/splash_bmp.ko.symbols...done. > done. > Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/splash_bmp.ko > Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/geom_stripe.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/geom_stripe.ko.symbols...done. > done. > Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/geom_stripe.ko > Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/acpi.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/acpi.ko.symbols...done. > done. > Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/acpi.ko > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 > 196 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r" (td)); > (kgdb) bt > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 > #1 0xc0563d48 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:418 > #2 0xc0564025 in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available. > ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:574 > #3 0xc06cd16d in ffs_write (ap=0xe6912a44) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vnops.c:667 > #4 0xc0740640 in VOP_WRITE_APV (vop=0xc07ba4e0, a=0xe6912a44) at vnode_if.c:691 > #5 0xc06fd8d6 in vnode_pager_generic_putpages (vp=0xc672f678, m=0xe6912bb0, bytecount=Variable "bytecount" is not available. > ) at vnode_if.h:373 > #6 0xc05d4a5f in vop_stdputpages (ap=0xe6912ad4) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_default.c:540 > #7 0xc073faf3 in VOP_PUTPAGES_APV (vop=0xc07ba4e0, a=0xe6912ad4) at vnode_if.c:2189 > #8 0xc06fda5f in vnode_pager_putpages (object=0xcb14ac80, m=0xe6912bb0, count=1, sync=0, rtvals=0xe6912b20) at vnode_if.h:1164 > #9 0xc06f730b in vm_pageout_flush (mc=0xe6912bb0, count=1, flags=0) at vm_pager.h:148 > #10 0xc06f7661 in vm_pageout_clean (m=Variable "m" is not available. > ) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c:403 > #11 0xc06f92a2 in vm_pageout () at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c:1017 > #12 0xc053e9a1 in fork_exit (callout=0xc06f82d6 , arg=0x0, frame=0xe6912d38) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:811 > #13 0xc0718b30 in fork_trampoline () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:271 > (kgdb) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 06:40:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E2D106566B for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 06:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gvanessen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4388FC0A for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 06:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxi39 with SMTP id 39so1438927vxi.13 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:40:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5LWCmRoVJ7e7BiitJf6y7GJ4LAuuCvNemfjSSMh0kOM=; b=FARIt5lv+u/+XUU81e5UnK2r2VlHRSxzvTk7hEMyHkbY0O8tz0+HYNKVgIn0MNAjT8 ODggKsjbb5owxBPVVyqY/0oEYIsKjzB4r1+kNP9wdrW1UhuTVuBuCo38A3xfPTCrhErO DCbWlU0AqXGUtdmuuTIUWCQyXvgbyzH8M0tds= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.179.9 with SMTP id dc9mr30088vdc.1.1315548697746; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.167.85 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 23:11:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6C3F8332272B7D4DA26909F15F1C90E1E5B424@SRV01.double-l.local> References: <6C3F8332272B7D4DA26909F15F1C90E1E5AC4C@SRV01.double-l.local> <20110826180517.4e4e585f@mr12941> <6C3F8332272B7D4DA26909F15F1C90E1E5ACC4@SRV01.double-l.local> <6C3F8332272B7D4DA26909F15F1C90E1E5B424@SRV01.double-l.local> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:11:37 +0100 Message-ID: From: Gerard van Essen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: CARP on 9.0 (was no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 06:40:52 -0000 On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Johan Hendriks wrote: > SOLVED! > > Was a typo in /etc/sysctl.conf > Sorry for the noise > > and thanks for your time. > > regards > Johan > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org] > namens Johan Hendriks [Johan@double-l.nl] > Verzonden: vrijdag 26 augustus 2011 20:22 > Aan: Brian Seklecki (Mobile); freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > CC: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Onderwerp: RE: CARP on 9.0 (was no subject) > > >How about: > > > %sudo netstat -s carp > > >...on both machines. > > >A few years ago I submitted (or maybe it was Steve Polyack) a patch to add > >debugging to CARP, not sure if it ever got commited. > > >Need-more-Cisco'sih-Debugging. > > >~BAS > > > >On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > > >> Le Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:26:28 +0000, > >> Johan Hendriks a ?crit : > >> > >>> I am trying to set up CARP under 9.0 > >> > >> ... > >> > >>> Also with a higer value like advskew 200 or 254 the role of the > >>> servers stays the same. > >> > >> Ok, there is something wrong so. > >> > >> Did you check that the sysctl net.inet.carp.suppress_preempt is equal > >> to zero ? If yes, I don't have any more idea. > >> > >> Regards. > > Hello > first off all thanks for your time. > > sysctl -a | grep carp on both machines give me the following output > > sysctl -a | grep carp > device carp > net.inet.ip.same_prefix_carp_only: 0 > net.inet.carp.allow: 1 > net.inet.carp.preempt: 0 > net.inet.carp.log: 2 > net.inet.carp.arpbalance: 0 > net.inet.carp.suppress_preempt: 0 > > > netstat -s on the master > > carp: > 260 packets received (IPv4) > 0 packets received (IPv6) > 0 packets discarded for wrong TTL > 0 packets shorter than header > 0 discarded for bad checksums > 0 discarded packets with a bad version > 0 discarded because packet too short > 0 discarded for bad authentication > 0 discarded for bad vhid > 0 discarded because of a bad address list > 11430 packets sent (IPv4) > 0 packets sent (IPv6) > 0 send failed due to mbuf memory error > > netstat -s on the slave > > carp: > 11735 packets received (IPv4) > 0 packets received (IPv6) > 0 packets discarded for wrong TTL > 0 packets shorter than header > 0 discarded for bad checksums > 0 discarded packets with a bad version > 0 discarded because packet too short > 0 discarded for bad authentication > 0 discarded for bad vhid > 0 discarded because of a bad address list > 448 packets sent (IPv4) > 0 packets sent (IPv6) > 0 send failed due to mbuf memory error > > tcpdump -i bge0 on slave > > 20:10:48.868200 IP 192.168.50.40 > vrrp.mcast.net: VRRPv2, Advertisement, > vrid 1, prio 50, authtype none, intvl 1s, length 36 > > Here the advskew is set to 50, on the slave it is 20. > So the slave should be the master. > if i raise the advskew to 254, i see the change in the capture. > > Both machines are fresh install with nothing changed on them so far just a > fresh build from a csup this morning. > And installed bash as the shell.. > > for freebsd-current@ the /etc/rc.conf file again > Master > ifconfig_bge0="inet 192.168.50.40 netmask 255.255.255.0" > defaultrouter="192.168.50.150" > # CARP > cloned_interfaces="carp0" > ifconfig_carp0="vhid 1 advskew 10 pass letmepass 192.168.50.45 netmask > 255.255.255.0" > > On the slave i have the following in /etc/rc.conf > ifconfig_bge0="inet 192.168.50.41 netmask 255.255.255.0" > defaultrouter="192.168.50.150" > # CARP > cloned_interfaces="carp0" > ifconfig_carp0="vhid 1 advskew 20 pass letmepass 192.168.50.45 netmask > 255.255.255.0" > > regards, > Johan > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 07:21:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555B01065670 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:21:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCA58FC13 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:21:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 20297459 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:21:22 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p896LLuB028742 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:21:22 +0700 (OMSST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p896LLjF028741 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:21:21 +0700 (OMSST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:21:21 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110909062121.GA28440@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Need an audio multicasting solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:21:41 -0000 Colleagues, I need a solution to read sound from a soundcard (/dev/dsp) and multicast it into the network, for the multicast audio stream to be played on FreeBSD, Linux and Windows workstations. No sophisticated codecs needed, plain PCM would do. Can you advise something? I know that in theory there are many ways to implement this, but I am especially interested in personal first-hand experience, success stories or good white papers. Please no lmgtfu-type replies. Thanks very much in advance. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 11:29:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF05C106566B for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:29:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net) Received: from fmailhost01.isp.att.net (fmailhost01.isp.att.net [204.127.217.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF7D8FC1B for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:29:28 +0000 (GMT) X-Comment: Sending client does not conform to RFC822 minimum requirements X-Comment: Date has been added by Maillennium Received: from localhost (adsl-68-210-183-183.sdf.bellsouth.net[68.210.183.183]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc01) with SMTP id <20110909112927H0100n3ks0e>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:29:27 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.210.183.183] From: "Thomas Mueller" Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: get rel 9.0 iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:29:29 -0000 I think dvd1.iso was < 700 MB and would therefore fit on a CD? I just checked, it was < 700 MB: Index of ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/9.0/ Up to higher level directory Name Size Last Modified File:CHECKSUM.MD5 1 KB 09/01/11 00:00:00 File:CHECKSUM.SHA256 1 KB 09/01/11 00:00:00 File:FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2-amd64-bootonly.iso 142490 KB 08/31/11 18:45:00 File:FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2-amd64-dvd1.iso 621926 KB 08/31/11 18:43:00 File:FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2-amd64-memstick.img 666990 KB 08/31/11 18:46:00 (end of quote) My computer from July 2001 had CD-RW but no DVD. This was one of the factors pushing me to buy parts for a new computer. FreeBSD 8.2 slice on old computer is about 12 GB with 1.3 GB free; RAM is 256 MB. So a better way to upgrade to 9.0 might be to build on the new computer onto a 16 GB USB stick, I wouldn't even need to keep the ports tree or system source on the USB stick. I assume booting a USB stick with Plop would work on the 2001 computer with FreeBSD as it did with NetBSD 4.0.1 and NetBSD-current. Due to insufficient RAM and insufficient disk space for the bigger packages/ports, I feel like I'm at the end of the line with FreeBSD, NetBSD too, on the 2001 computer; would need to build on my new computer. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 11:49:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E98B1065672 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830E18FC19 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:49:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=VI8lc6AqZDaBo/3ieFgtAMCTb7i0iSIQhRzibxcOjyw=; b=a1whav4TFbdYhruy/1NNc+ySR1zFEYVXnop7sQtym54sSYgDro7XTeZLCX0zBJj22N/RpL7/Mu5SWwBSA58RODSRjNU7NWGEnOD74VQ+lcdn0aj4VVuNo2MPTd+IamcDm/43+3ocyqkwdzjidpAvoWxF+dgcQUlUFCNAjjvWS80= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 04:49:03 -0700 Message-ID: <4E69FD2D.1060901@a1poweruser.com> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:49:01 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Mueller References: <20110909112928.EF05C106566B@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110909112928.EF05C106566B@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Sep 2011 11:49:03.0650 (UTC) FILETIME=[78E1D020:01CC6EE6] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: get rel 9.0 iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:49:03 -0000 "Thomas Mueller I think dvd1.iso was < 700 MB and would therefore fit on a CD? > > I just checked, it was < 700 MB: > > Index of ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/9.0/ > > Up to higher level directory > Name Size Last Modified > File:CHECKSUM.MD5 1 KB 09/01/11 00:00:00 > File:CHECKSUM.SHA256 1 KB 09/01/11 00:00:00 > File:FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2-amd64-bootonly.iso 142490 KB 08/31/11 18:45:00 > File:FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2-amd64-dvd1.iso 621926 KB 08/31/11 18:43:00 > File:FreeBSD-9.0-BETA2-amd64-memstick.img 666990 KB 08/31/11 18:46:00 > > (end of quote) > > My computer from July 2001 had CD-RW but no DVD. This was one of the factors pushing me to buy parts for a new computer. > > FreeBSD 8.2 slice on old computer is about 12 GB with 1.3 GB free; RAM is 256 MB. > > So a better way to upgrade to 9.0 might be to build on the new computer onto a 16 GB USB stick, I wouldn't even need to keep the ports tree or system source on the USB stick. I assume booting a USB stick with Plop would work on the 2001 computer with FreeBSD as it did with NetBSD 4.0.1 and NetBSD-current. > > Due to insufficient RAM and insufficient disk space for the bigger packages/ports, I feel like I'm at the end of the line with FreeBSD, NetBSD too, on the 2001 computer; would need to build on my new computer. > > Tom > The dvd1.iso file is less than 700mb and would fit on a standard cd. But the point is you do not install from a .iso file. The .iso file is a compressed file and when you uncompress it it's way to large to fit on a standard cd but will fit on a dvd. Thats why its named dvd1.iso. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 12:26:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1EF106566B for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A768FC0C for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-64-49.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.64.49]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p89CQoaK034520; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 14:26:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <4E6A0609.4010409@bananmonarki.se> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:26:49 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110821 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Venturoli References: <4E69217C.5000306@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <4E69217C.5000306@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with crash dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:26:54 -0000 2011-09-08 22:11, Andrea Venturoli skrev: > Hello. > > Anyone can give any hint on this? Guessing! You have run out of swapspace, based on these 2 lines panic: ffs_write: dir write current process = 0 (swapper) Or you have a hardware error. Does the "current process" change between panics or is it always the same? I'm in no sense a kernel debugger, but it's a hint. > I really have no clue. > > bye & Thanks > av. > > >> # uname -a >> FreeBSD xxxxx.xxxxxxxx.it 7.3-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p4 #1: >> Wed Dec 15 11:53:13 CET 2010 >> root@xxxxx.xxxxxxxx.it:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxxxx i386 >> # kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.17 >> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] >> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and >> you are >> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain >> conditions. >> Type "show copying" to see the conditions. >> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for >> details. >> This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"... >> >> Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: >> panic: ffs_write: dir write >> cpuid = 3 >> Uptime: 26d9h4m27s >> Physical memory: 2033 MB >> Dumping 300 MB: 285 269 253 237 221 205 189 173 157 141 125 109 93 >> 77kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled >> >> >> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >> cpuid = 3; apic id = 03 >> fault virtual address = 0x14 >> fault code = supervisor read, page not present >> instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc059accb >> stack pointer = 0x28:0xc0c20ccc >> frame pointer = 0x28:0xc0c20cec >> code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b >> = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 >> processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0 >> current process = 0 (swapper) >> trap number = 12 >> panic: page fault >> cpuid = 3 >> 61 45 29 13 >> >> Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/splash_bmp.ko...Reading symbols from >> /boot/kernel/splash_bmp.ko.symbols...done. >> done. >> Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/splash_bmp.ko >> Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/geom_stripe.ko...Reading symbols >> from /boot/kernel/geom_stripe.ko.symbols...done. >> done. >> Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/geom_stripe.ko >> Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/acpi.ko...Reading symbols from >> /boot/kernel/acpi.ko.symbols...done. >> done. >> Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/acpi.ko >> #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 >> 196 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r" (td)); >> (kgdb) bt >> #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 >> #1 0xc0563d48 in boot (howto=260) at >> /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:418 >> #2 0xc0564025 in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available. >> ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:574 >> #3 0xc06cd16d in ffs_write (ap=0xe6912a44) at >> /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vnops.c:667 >> #4 0xc0740640 in VOP_WRITE_APV (vop=0xc07ba4e0, a=0xe6912a44) at >> vnode_if.c:691 >> #5 0xc06fd8d6 in vnode_pager_generic_putpages (vp=0xc672f678, >> m=0xe6912bb0, bytecount=Variable "bytecount" is not available. >> ) at vnode_if.h:373 >> #6 0xc05d4a5f in vop_stdputpages (ap=0xe6912ad4) at >> /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_default.c:540 >> #7 0xc073faf3 in VOP_PUTPAGES_APV (vop=0xc07ba4e0, a=0xe6912ad4) at >> vnode_if.c:2189 >> #8 0xc06fda5f in vnode_pager_putpages (object=0xcb14ac80, >> m=0xe6912bb0, count=1, sync=0, rtvals=0xe6912b20) at vnode_if.h:1164 >> #9 0xc06f730b in vm_pageout_flush (mc=0xe6912bb0, count=1, flags=0) at >> vm_pager.h:148 >> #10 0xc06f7661 in vm_pageout_clean (m=Variable "m" is not available. >> ) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c:403 >> #11 0xc06f92a2 in vm_pageout () at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c:1017 >> #12 0xc053e9a1 in fork_exit (callout=0xc06f82d6 , arg=0x0, >> frame=0xe6912d38) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:811 >> #13 0xc0718b30 in fork_trampoline () at >> /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:271 >> (kgdb) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 13:12:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306251065674 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkeusem@visi.com) Received: from g2host.com (mailfront3.g2host.com [208.42.184.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDD18FC1B for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [173.30.51.17] (account pkeusem@visi.com HELO [172.16.175.217]) by mailfront3.g2host.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.11) with ESMTPSA id 27633319 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:52:50 -0500 Message-ID: <4E6A0C1F.7090505@visi.com> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:52:47 -0500 From: Paul Keusemann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110810 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Is-From-Me: yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Can't log in as toor since package update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:12:52 -0000 I use the toor login on my FreeBSD systems to log in with the korn shell. Since August 22, When I try to log in as toor or even when I try to "su - toor", I get logged in as root. For example: ushers# ssh -l toor woodstock Password: Last login: Fri Sep 9 06:30:23 2011 from 172.16.175.216 Copyright (c) 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 (WOODSTOCK) #1: Mon Jul 11 09:05:07 CDT 2011 woodstock# who am i root 0 Sep 9 07:46 woodstock# su - toor woodstock# who am i root 0 Sep 9 07:47 Unfortunately, I haven't tried to log in since a package update I did around August 22, so I didn't notice this problem until now. Does anybody have any idea what might be causing this? -- Paul Keusemann pkeusem@visi.com 4266 Joppa Court (952) 894-7805 Savage, MN 55378 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 13:29:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8E1106566C for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CFB8FC1C for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yib19 with SMTP id 19so998547yib.13 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 06:28:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.131.138 with SMTP id hq10mr1057439icc.181.1315574938922; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 06:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.231.33.10 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 06:28:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110909062121.GA28440@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20110909062121.GA28440@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:28:58 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NbpjKaMLYI6R-7A_WJhTkJ3bkKE Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Need an audio multicasting solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:29:00 -0000 On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, > > I need a solution to read sound from a soundcard (/dev/dsp) and > multicast it into the network, for the multicast audio stream to be > played on FreeBSD, Linux and Windows workstations. No sophisticated > codecs needed, plain PCM would do. > > Can you advise something? I know that in theory there are many ways to > implement this, but I am especially interested in personal first-hand > experience, success stories or good white papers. Please no > lmgtfu-type replies. Thanks very much in advance. > I doubt people in this list are the lmgtfu type! I use Icecast on FBSD and it works great. For the client though we use Ubuntu with idjc and Jack. Probably Jack works well on FBSD (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/audio/jack_mixer/) and you could run everything on a single node, but from my experience with Jack on Linux, it probably ain't gonna be easy. Nevertheless, the _usual_ way is having your *cast daemon on a server with ample bandwidth and the client(s) is separate node. For us, the Icecast FBSD server + idjc/Jack on Linux is a great combination but YMMV. Regards, --=20 Alejandro Imass > -- > Victor Sudakov, =A0VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 13:29:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1E6106564A for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@larseighner.com) Received: from mail.team1internet.com (mail.team1internet.com [216.110.13.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2E18FC17 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from larseighner.com (unknown [216.110.13.101]) by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F97916B57A; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:29:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by larseighner.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 lars@larseighner.com; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:29:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:29:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Lars Eighner X-X-Sender: lars@noos.6dollardialup To: Paul Keusemann In-Reply-To: <4E6A0C1F.7090505@visi.com> Message-ID: References: <4E6A0C1F.7090505@visi.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't log in as toor since package update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:29:56 -0000 On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Paul Keusemann wrote: > I use the toor login on my FreeBSD systems to log in with the korn shell. > Since August 22, When I try to log in as toor or even when I try to "su - > toor", I get logged in as root. For example: > > ushers# ssh -l toor woodstock > > Password: > > Last login: Fri Sep 9 06:30:23 2011 from 172.16.175.216 > > Copyright (c) 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1993, 1994 > > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > > FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 (WOODSTOCK) #1: Mon Jul 11 09:05:07 CDT 2011 > > woodstock# who am i > > root 0 Sep 9 07:46 This has been entirely normal since I have been using toor - sometime around 5.X. Toor is root. If you are not in your korn shell, you should check that it is install and the path is correct in passwd. If you have been running at toor with the thought that somehow it is better than running as root, you are mistaken. You should have a normal user account to use for most everyday tasks. You can put that user in the wheel group if you want to be able to su to root. > woodstock# su - toor > > woodstock# who am i > > root 0 Sep 9 07:47 > Unfortunately, I haven't tried to log in since a package update I did around > August 22, so I didn't notice this problem until now. Does anybody have any > idea what might be causing this? The fact that user 0 is root to the system. Calling it toor to use an alternate shell does not change that. -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 13:44:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07461065687 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:44:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jedwards@bsdftw.org) Received: from cphost1.iglou.com (cphost1.iglou.com [64.253.105.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999418FC08 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 74-143-31-20.static.insightbb.com ([74.143.31.20] helo=[10.100.1.141]) by cphost1.iglou.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R218A-0005Ch-Sf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:28:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4E6A1497.8020807@bsdftw.org> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:28:55 -0400 From: James Edwards User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E6A0C1F.7090505@visi.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6A0C1F.7090505@visi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IgLou-Customer: 069cc32fa5ef80384286ee33d67897cd X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cphost1.iglou.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bsdftw.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Can't log in as toor since package update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:44:20 -0000 On 9/9/2011 8:52 AM, Paul Keusemann wrote: > I use the toor login on my FreeBSD systems to log in with the korn > shell. Since August 22, When I try to log in as toor or even when I > try to "su - toor", I get logged in as root. For example: > > ushers# ssh -l toor woodstock > > Password: > > Last login: Fri Sep 9 06:30:23 2011 from 172.16.175.216 > > Copyright (c) 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1993, 1994 > > The Regents of the University of California. All rights > reserved. > > FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 (WOODSTOCK) #1: Mon Jul 11 09:05:07 CDT 2011 > > woodstock# who am i > > root 0 Sep 9 07:46 > > woodstock# su - toor > > woodstock# who am i > > root 0 Sep 9 07:47 > > > Unfortunately, I haven't tried to log in since a package update I did > around August 22, so I didn't notice this problem until now. Does > anybody have any idea what might be causing this? > That seems to be the normal behavior, because toor has the id of root. I'm running 8.2-RELEASE, and that seems to be normal behavior. On one of my systems: [root@mail01]~# who am i root 1 Sep 9 09:26 [root@mail01]~# su - toor [toor@mail01]~# who am i root 1 Sep 9 09:26 [toor@mail01]~# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 13:49:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B716D106566C for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out9.libero.it (cp-out9.libero.it [212.52.84.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A91B8FC08 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:49:18 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0205.4E6A195C.0176,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1555 Received: from soth.ventu (151.41.235.47) by cp-out9.libero.it (8.5.133) id 4E68B8CC002FDB63; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:49:16 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p89Dn5gY010159; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:49:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4E6A1951.8000806@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:49:05 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110908 Thunderbird/3.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernt Hansson References: <4E69217C.5000306@netfence.it> <4E6A0609.4010409@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <4E6A0609.4010409@bananmonarki.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 10.1.2.13 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with crash dump X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:49:18 -0000 On 09/09/11 14:26, Bernt Hansson wrote: > You have run out of swapspace, based on these 2 lines > > panic: ffs_write: dir write > current process = 0 (swapper) Hmmm... Cacti woldn't think so: the graph about swap space is plain flat (round 0%, by the way); of course it could have risen so fast that it reached 100% between two consecutive polls, but I doubt it. Besides, why would the system crash for such a reason? I'd expect application failing, not the whole kernel. Am I wrong? > Or you have a hardware error. SOB! I hope not. RAM is fine, HDs are SAS RAID with a good contoller which should have detected failures... What else can I check? > Does the "current process" > change between panics or is it always the same? Right now I've only had this crash (and hope no other will follow). In the worst case, I'll take notice. > I'm in no sense a kernel debugger, but it's a hint. I appreciate your interest anyway. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 14:28:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D340106566B for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 14:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: from mailhost.ssr.com (mailhost.ssr.com [199.4.235.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD0458FC08 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 14:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56959 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2011 14:23:10 -0000 Received: from pool-71-167-240-59.nycmny.east.verizon.net (HELO irelay.ssr.com) (sdb@71.167.240.59) by 199.4.235.5 with SMTP; 9 Sep 2011 14:23:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 96274 invoked by uid 103); 9 Sep 2011 14:13:15 -0000 Date: 9 Sep 2011 14:13:15 -0000 Message-ID: <20110909141315.96273.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> From: Scott Ballantyne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: portmaster -r libnotify-0 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:28:00 -0000 Hi, I've been trying to update libnotify and libproxy following the instructions in UPDATING, which is to do portmaster -r libnotify-0 This trys to install ghostscript9, and fails. Apparently ghostscript9 conflicts with ghostscript8-8.71_6, which presumably is the reason for the failure. Could someone help me resolve this? The obvious solution of pkg_delete ghostscript8-8.71_6 doesn't work, because too many installed ports depend on ghostscript8-8.71_6. Thanks in advance, Scott -- sdb@ssr.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 15:27:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAB11065673 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkeusem@visi.com) Received: from g2host.com (mailfront3.g2host.com [208.42.184.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C818FC0C for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [173.30.51.17] (account pkeusem@visi.com HELO [172.16.175.217]) by mailfront3.g2host.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.11) with ESMTPSA id 27660839 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:27:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4E6A305A.1040105@visi.com> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:27:22 -0500 From: Paul Keusemann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110810 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E6A0C1F.7090505@visi.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6A0C1F.7090505@visi.com> X-Is-From-Me: yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Can't log in as toor since package update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:27:24 -0000 On 09/09/11 07:52, Paul Keusemann wrote: > I use the toor login on my FreeBSD systems to log in with the korn > shell. Since August 22, When I try to log in as toor or even when I > try to "su - toor", I get logged in as root. For example: > > ushers# ssh -l toor woodstock > > Password: > > Last login: Fri Sep 9 06:30:23 2011 from 172.16.175.216 > > Copyright (c) 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1993, 1994 > > The Regents of the University of California. All rights > reserved. > > FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 (WOODSTOCK) #1: Mon Jul 11 09:05:07 CDT 2011 > > woodstock# who am i > > root 0 Sep 9 07:46 > > woodstock# su - toor > > woodstock# who am i > > root 0 Sep 9 07:47 > > > Unfortunately, I haven't tried to log in since a package update I did > around August 22, so I didn't notice this problem until now. Does > anybody have any idea what might be causing this? > OK, a couple of clarifications: - First, this is a shell problem, not a user id problem. - Second, su does give me the correct shell. In my earlier frustrated state, I did not check to make sure I was getting a csh shell from su. I have narrowed this down a little further and found a workaround. Normally, the way I start an admin shell on my FreeBSD machine via a menu item that runs a command something like this: ssh -l toor woodstock /usr/local/bin/xterm +ut -ls Up until August 22 or September 6, this would give me an xterm running a korn shell but now is giving me csh shell. The xterm package was updated September 6 but I don't see anything obvious in the change log. A quick look at the xterm man page shows me the login shell can be specified on the command line, so it looks like that is what I will have to do. I am still curious about what has changed in the last couple of weeks though. -- Paul Keusemann pkeusem@visi.com 4266 Joppa Court (952) 894-7805 Savage, MN 55378 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 16:04:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F63106564A for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7AF8FC14 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D245E1E8 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:47:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.458 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.458 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id m7cARzg0b7uY for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:47:18 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41385E1D6 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:47:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E6A3504.6020002@eskk.nu> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:47:16 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110907 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Printing from Firefox broken after update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:04:46 -0000 Since a while back I've had a problem with printing from Firefox. I get this error in CUPS when I try to print. /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops failed I have done the following: portmaster -t -f print/cups portmaster -t -f www/firefox But it has not helped. I would like some help to identify the problem Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 16:41:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD311065670 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdlisten@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E478FC1D for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so3617801fxe.13 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:41:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LhuZSZ7JhAWMdHOF2OjiQ2AE4Mg2l7XK1rUwlhW0DCU=; b=AZkDozU1tpCMUMNK4qdn65TBXebfpuTvQMCs5/IeYaqNdunqisr5+ftOA4k3LoXwz5 Gnt5WfW4WtVl2NMRbYjOSA6EolxnNwMDcvQmTAhMaPorhTDnKClZQ1YRvUYWE3JjHSmO 1onBnm2InaN0l0YmBpXTUpZoYOn/Pi2qOE2nc= Received: by 10.223.92.148 with SMTP id r20mr628641fam.94.1315585048902; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debiand1.localdom.ain ([89.47.83.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d8sm2981617fae.0.2011.09.09.09.17.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:17:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 19:17:26 +0300 From: Rares Aioanei To: Leslie Jensen Message-ID: <20110909191726.4af3e660@debiand1.localdom.ain> In-Reply-To: <4E6A3504.6020002@eskk.nu> References: <4E6A3504.6020002@eskk.nu> User-Agent: my user agent X-Mailer: my x-mailer Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing from Firefox broken after update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:41:29 -0000 On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:47:16 +0200 Leslie Jensen wrote: > /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops failed Does the file exist? -- Rares Aioanei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 17:24:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F75D106564A for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mdkelly@ualr.edu) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358318FC16 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkat8 with SMTP id t8so2220286bka.13 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.135.18 with SMTP id l18mr1626229bkt.341.1315587184263; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:53:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.38.195 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:52:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E69FD2D.1060901@a1poweruser.com> References: <20110909112928.EF05C106566B@hub.freebsd.org> <4E69FD2D.1060901@a1poweruser.com> From: Mike Kelly Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:52:44 -0500 Message-ID: To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Thomas Mueller , Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: get rel 9.0 iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:24:30 -0000 > > The dvd1.iso file is less than 700mb and would fit on a standard cd. But >> the point is you do not install from a .iso file. The .iso file is a >> compressed file and when you uncompress it it's way to large to fit on a >> standard cd but will fit on a dvd. Thats why its named dvd1.iso. > > > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > I just burned the dvd1.iso to a cd-r this morning and used it to install to a laptop. Worked great. I think there is some confusion about compression on the iso file. There is none on the file in question. Previous DVD iso files have been compressed, which gives it a filename of dvd1.iso.xz. The 9.0BETA2 file is not compressed though. Mike Kelly From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 18:56:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B86106564A for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6878FC0A for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BD15E176; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:56:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.458 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.458 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iuPpm3zoUssd; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:56:19 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09ED15E186; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:56:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E6A6152.5070703@eskk.nu> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:56:18 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110907 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rares Aioanei References: <4E6A3504.6020002@eskk.nu> <20110909191726.4af3e660@debiand1.localdom.ain> In-Reply-To: <20110909191726.4af3e660@debiand1.localdom.ain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printing from Firefox broken after update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 18:56:07 -0000 2011-09-09 18:17, Rares Aioanei skrev: > On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:47:16 +0200 > Leslie Jensen wrote: > >> /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops failed > > Does the file exist? > Yes! -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 20112 9 Sep 09:12 /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 19:46:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F171065672 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 19:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-gx0-f179.google.com (mail-gx0-f179.google.com [209.85.161.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708548FC0A for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 19:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk1 with SMTP id 1so1720011gxk.10 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.22.9 with SMTP id s9mr14577462yhs.129.1315597572554; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi.localnet ([186.212.242.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n67sm7685471yhi.9.2011.09.09.12.46.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:46:11 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org From: Mario Lobo Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:46:15 -0300 X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201109091646.15327.lobo@bsd.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: VPN problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:46:13 -0000 Hi; I've been having this problem establishing a VPN behind a FreeBSD 8-STABLE with pf. I have this scenario: home LAN ---- FBSD+pf home ---- INTERNET --- FBSD+pf work --- work LAN MPD VPN server nat rules on FBSD+pf home: nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 # nat on $ext_if from any to any -> ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 obs- it makes no difference which nat rule I use. The problem persists. These are the first 5 pf rules on FBSD+pf home: # pass quick all pass quick on lo0 all # my whole home lan is free pass in quick on $int_if from $int_if:network to any #--- Allow networks to see themselves and dns pass quick from $int_if:network to $int_if:network #--- Allow vpns from anywhere to anywhere pass in quick log on $int_if proto gre from any to any keep state pass in quick log on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags S/SA keep state On any attempt to connect to the FBSD+pf work VPN Server from home LAN, I get this (even if I uncomment pass quick all): #>mpd5 Multi-link PPP daemon for FreeBSD process 98799 started, version 5.5 (root@Papi 16:55 3-Sep-2011) CONSOLE: listening on 127.0.0.1 5005 web: listening on 127.0.0.1 5006 [B1] Bundle: Interface ng0 created [L1] [L1] Link: OPEN event [L1] LCP: Open event [L1] LCP: state change Initial --> Starting [L1] LCP: LayerStart [L1] PPTP call successful [L1] Link: UP event [L1] LCP: Up event [L1] LCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 [L1] MRU 1486 [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 [snip..] [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #10 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 [L1] MRU 1486 [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 [L1] LCP: parameter negotiation failed [L1] LCP: state change Req-Sent --> Stopped [L1] LCP: LayerFinish [L1] PPTP call terminated [L1] Link: DOWN event [L1] LCP: Close event [L1] LCP: state change Stopped --> Closed [L1] LCP: Down event [L1] LCP: state change Closed --> Initial BUT, on the 9th or 10th attempt, without touching any setting anywhere, the VPN MAY BE established. out of nothing ! Machines (Windows, Unix, whatever) behind both FBSD+pfs ALSO have the same problem when trying to close VPN tunnels to outside sites. Sometimes, opening an ssh session from my workstation to FBSD+pf work may "help" in establishing the VPN. The FBSD+pf work VPN Server is working fine. My colleagues can connect to it from their homes (NATted cable modems or 3G modems) without problems. I am the only one behind a FBSD+pf router. I installed MPD5 on FBSD+pf home, and copied mpd.conf from my home workstation to it. Without touching a single setting on mpd.conf, the VPN is established from FBSD+pf home (as a client) to FBSD+pf work WITHOUT any hiccups on EVERY SINGLE attempt! even I bring it up/down 200 times! And yet, if the FBSD+pf combo is out of the way, (i.e. no NAT!, as is the case of FBSD+pf home as a client) or if I let my cable modem do the NAT/routing, the problem is GONE!. FreeBSD work FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 22 14:50:42 BRT 2011 amd64 FreeBSD Home FreeBSD FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed May 18 16:53:26 BRT 2011 i386 Any suggestions? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 20:00:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74747106566B; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: from capella.hmnoc.net (capella.hmnoc.net [174.122.209.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421148FC0A; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [186.212.242.15] (port=63422 helo=papi.localnet) by capella.hmnoc.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R26uT-0005Xv-0M; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:38:45 -0300 From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:38:51 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.6.2; amd64; ; ) X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201109091638.51633.mlobo@digiart.art.br> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - capella.hmnoc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - digiart.art.br Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: VPN problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:00:49 -0000 Hi; I've been having this problem closing a VPN behind a FreeBSD 8-STABLE with pf. I have this scenario: home LAN ---- FBSD+pf home ---- INTERNET --- FBSD+pf work --- work LAN MPD VPN server nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 # nat on $ext_if from any to any -> ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 obs- it makes no difference which nat rule I use. The problem persists. These are the first 5 pf rules on FBSD+pf home: # pass quick all pass quick on lo0 all # my whole home lan is free pass in quick on $int_if from $int_if:network to any #--- Allow networks to see themselves and dns pass quick from $int_if:network to $int_if:network #--- Allow vpns from anywhere to anywhere pass in quick log on $int_if proto gre from any to any keep state pass in quick log on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags S/SA keep state On any attempt to conect to the FBSD+pf work VPN Server from home LAN, I get this (even if I uncomment pass quick all): #>mpd5 Multi-link PPP daemon for FreeBSD process 98799 started, version 5.5 (root@Papi 16:55 3-Sep-2011) CONSOLE: listening on 127.0.0.1 5005 web: listening on 127.0.0.1 5006 [B1] Bundle: Interface ng0 created [L1] [L1] Link: OPEN event [L1] LCP: Open event [L1] LCP: state change Initial --> Starting [L1] LCP: LayerStart [L1] PPTP call successful [L1] Link: UP event [L1] LCP: Up event [L1] LCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 [L1] MRU 1486 [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 [snip..] [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #10 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 [L1] MRU 1486 [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 [L1] LCP: parameter negotiation failed [L1] LCP: state change Req-Sent --> Stopped [L1] LCP: LayerFinish [L1] PPTP call terminated [L1] Link: DOWN event [L1] LCP: Close event [L1] LCP: state change Stopped --> Closed [L1] LCP: Down event [L1] LCP: state change Closed --> Initial BUT, on the 9th or 10th attempt, without touching any setting anywhere, the VPN MAY BE established. out of nothing ! Machines (Windows, unix, whatever) behind both FBSD+pfs ALSO have the same problem when trying to close VPN tunnels to outside sites. The FBSD+pf work VPN Server is working fine. My coleagues can conect to it from their homes (NATted cable modems or 3G modems) without problems. I am the only one behind a FBSD+pf router. I installed MPD5 on FBSD+pf home, and copied mpd.conf from my home workstation to it. Without touching a single setting on mpd.conf, the VPN is established from FBSD+pf home (as a client) to FBSD+pf work WITHOUT any hickups on EVERY SINGLE attempt! even I bring it up/down 200 times! And yet, if the FBSD+pf combo is out of the way, (i.e. no NAT!, as is the case of FBSD+pf home as a client) or if I let my cable modem do the NAT/routing, the problem is GONE!. FreeBSD work FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 22 14:50:42 BRT 2011 amd64 FreeBSD Home FreeBSD FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed May 18 16:53:26 BRT 2011 i386 Any suggestions? -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 20:08:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B79106566C for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:08:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6536E8FC12 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A0B3D316 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:08:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p89K85sO001984 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:08:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:08:05 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "questions@freebsd.org" Message-Id: <20110909220805.dc9bd8fe.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <0LrNzk-1R9Gx31Eyq-013cE7@mx.kundenserver.de> References: <0LrNzk-1R9Gx31Eyq-013cE7@mx.kundenserver.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: get rel 9.0 iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:08:07 -0000 On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:31:57 +0000 (GMT), Thomas Mueller wrote: > Is that pc that can't boot from memstick old? I have an old > PC, dating to July 2001, that can't boot directly from USB, > but can boot from USB with the help of Plop (http://www.plop.at/) > boot manager. If it doesn't boot directly (even my old 2005 PC has problems with that) try to use PLOP to boot the memstick image. You can easily directly copy it to a USB stick which would then be a bootable media. > I think dvd1.iso was < 700 MB and would therefore fit on a CD? No that would have been the CD#1; the traditional set of 4 CDs comes with CD#1 installation, CD#2 Live system (can also be used to install via Internet), CD#3 and CD#4 for packages. Those CD images are named "disc" instead of "dvd". You can find them for the current release at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/8.2/ FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso 48,108 KB -> CD FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso 668,928 KB -> CD FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.xz 2,017,993 KB -> DVD FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-i386-livefs.iso 258,216 KB -> CD FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-i386-memstick.img 936,150 KB -> USB Those set of images is typically generated for a RELEASE, not for CURRENT (and its BETA and RC stages). In your case, the 9.0-BETA2 "bootonly" CD can be used to boot the system and to start the installation via Internet (in case you don't have the option to boot from DVD). > My computer from July 2001 had CD-RW but no DVD. This was > one of the factors pushing me to buy parts for a new computer. In this case, I'd simply use CD because it seems to be less trouble (just in case USB boot via PLOP doesn't work). You can also go the following road: Install 8.2-RELEASE, do a source upgrade to 9.0-BETA and update your system from source. You'll find details in the FreeBSD Handbook and in /usr/src/Makefile's comment header. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 20:14:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59023106564A for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A17A8FC08 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:14:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121DA3D72E; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:14:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p89KEu5l002002; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:14:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:14:56 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Thomas Mueller" Message-Id: <20110909221456.4aa3af15.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <0MNbT8-1R4iI71L3K-007E7I@mx.kundenserver.de> References: <0MNbT8-1R4iI71L3K-007E7I@mx.kundenserver.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: get rel 9.0 iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:14:58 -0000 On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:29:28 +0000 (GMT), Thomas Mueller wrote: > FreeBSD 8.2 slice on old computer is about 12 GB with 1.3 GB > free; RAM is 256 MB. Depending on your particular software needs, a full FreeBSD installation _with_ programs can fit onto an 8 GB slice (or disk) with 50% free space. :-) > So a better way to upgrade to 9.0 might be to build on the > new computer onto a 16 GB USB stick, I wouldn't even need > to keep the ports tree or system source on the USB stick. You should just pay attention to building parameters (see "man make.conf" and "man src.conf") to keep the system in a minimal state, and make sure not to tie it to the hardware characteristics (especially CPU) of the building system. > I assume booting a USB stick with Plop would work on the > 2001 computer with FreeBSD as it did with NetBSD 4.0.1 > and NetBSD-current. Just try it, it should be possible. > Due to insufficient RAM and insufficient disk space for > the bigger packages/ports, I feel like I'm at the end > of the line with FreeBSD, NetBSD too, on the 2001 > computer; would need to build on my new computer. Yes, even if the system runs flawlessly, upgrading gets more and more complicated, so maybe migrating to a new machine would be better here. Just an addition: I still run a Pentium (yes, no numbers after the name!) with 150 MHz and 128 MB RAM here as a small server, using FreeBSD/x86 8.2. I did install from CD and then via Internet. Packages are fine to use in this case (see "man pkg_add"). Depending on _what_ the server does, even this over-obsoleted configuration might fit perfectly well! So I do _no_ claim it's impossible to run and install FreeBSD on older hardware. In fact, it _IS_ possible, maybe just a bit complicated in special cases (e. g. as the P1 server I mentioned does not even have USB, only a CD-ROM drive), but _POSSIBLE_, which may be fully sufficient in some cases. So "old iron" can still be a valueable citizen of the IT infrastructure. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 20:29:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB763106564A for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9528FC14 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-14-151.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.14.151]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92893D370; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:29:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id p89KTpId002353; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:29:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:29:51 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Leslie Jensen Message-Id: <20110909222951.45a29861.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4E6A6152.5070703@eskk.nu> References: <4E6A3504.6020002@eskk.nu> <20110909191726.4af3e660@debiand1.localdom.ain> <4E6A6152.5070703@eskk.nu> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Rares Aioanei Subject: Re: Printing from Firefox broken after update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:29:53 -0000 On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:56:18 +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: > 2011-09-09 18:17, Rares Aioanei skrev: > > On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:47:16 +0200 > > Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > >> /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops failed > > > > Does the file exist? > > > > > Yes! > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 20112 9 Sep 09:12 > /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops Try to run it manually. Take a PDF file and convert it into PS. Add options you might need for paper size. Example: % /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops -paper A4 test.pdf and check the PS output. See "man pdftops" for details. Maybe it's a dependency problem of pdftops... Note that the "normal" pdftops binary is provided by the xpdf port. Maybe you can try to update this one too? I'm not sure if CUPS's own binary is in some relation to that port, or is it working independently? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 20:30:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F7C1065679 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B118FC27 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p89KUYc6006374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 21:30:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p89KUYc6006374 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315600241; bh=hglgZcrXnA0/QSGBBzILGHnltzWPKQKfn0AKjTiIWTY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E6A7762.4050508@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20F ri,=2009=20Sep=202011=2021:30:26=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.2)=20Gecko/2 0110902=20Thunderbird/6.0.2|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Scott=20Ball antyne=20|CC:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject :=20Re:=20portmaster=20-r=20libnotify-0=20problems|References:=20< 20110909141315.96273.qmail@irelay.ssr.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<2011090 9141315.96273.qmail@irelay.ssr.com>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.3.1|Op enPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20mical g=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B= 0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig473AADCD70025C6AEE32BB52"; b=CrkE5udfhrfg9kkCm8vgGSe46LFmhV5uLpMdpmPda6VMiCS+FpcrRBZEx/vUFRrL/ TgFMEQzeB62JHqhwNEbD40XB+gpNz1hKsPiJdEqtWmQ0xg/VbaDlBiDIqlACgCMP8n NZZRaTlRDgJeDJnqi4DxOm6zyU0XWZPm6G5P5yUc= Message-ID: <4E6A7762.4050508@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:30:26 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Ballantyne References: <20110909141315.96273.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> In-Reply-To: <20110909141315.96273.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig473AADCD70025C6AEE32BB52" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -r libnotify-0 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:30:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig473AADCD70025C6AEE32BB52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/09/2011 15:13, Scott Ballantyne wrote: > I've been trying to update libnotify and libproxy following the > instructions in UPDATING, which is to do >=20 > portmaster -r libnotify-0 >=20 > This trys to install ghostscript9, and fails. Apparently ghostscript9 > conflicts with ghostscript8-8.71_6, which presumably is the reason for > the failure. >=20 > Could someone help me resolve this? The obvious solution of pkg_delete > ghostscript8-8.71_6 doesn't work, because too many installed ports > depend on ghostscript8-8.71_6. There are two approaches you might take here. Either * replace ghostscript8 with ghostscript9 or * work out why libnotify triggers a dependency on ghostscript9 and try and make it use ghostscript8 (or nothing) instead. The first is a relatively mechanical process, which should work fine from the point of view of doing all the port wrangling, but might result in further ghostscript8 vs ghostscript9 problems down the line. Just run: # portmaster -o print/ghostscript9 ghostscript8- That will change the dependency settings in your /var/db/pkg directory, which may or may not be appropriate for all ghostscript dependent ports, and indeed some may not work at all. (Although I rather doubt the simply not-working thing: functionality between those versions hasn't changed much at all.) The second is a more satisfying fix. Lets see... Try defining WITH_GHOSTSCRIPT_VER=3D8 in /etc/make.conf (the default is 9 nowadays) -- then try reinstalling libnotify according to the instructions in UPDATING. Read /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk for the details -- search for GHOSTSCRIPT to find the relevant bits. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig473AADCD70025C6AEE32BB52 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5qd2kACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxNeQCfXhZtmwI5mLjBaGnoZpZDZRwd v10AmwRgFTuciEsQmsJYM8BWwGY96XfJ =eHFu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig473AADCD70025C6AEE32BB52-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 20:47:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A0D1065670 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7228FC0C for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p89Kl8E5006628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 21:47:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p89Kl8E5006628 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315601229; bh=U4Jm//mGzKnsyktLgRBW6CgJFujc321pzmmOXthHN0o=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E6A7B43.5080806@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20F ri,=2009=20Sep=202011=2021:46:59=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.2)=20Gecko/2 0110902=20Thunderbird/6.0.2|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Paul=20Keuse mann=20|CC:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subj ect:=20Re:=20Can't=20log=20in=20as=20toor=20since=20package=20upda te|References:=20<4E6A0C1F.7090505@visi.com>=20<4E6A305A.1040105@v isi.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<4E6A305A.1040105@visi.com>|X-Enigmail-Ver sion:=201.3.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/s igned=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pg p-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig9C729E74A7A3D8 6F352885D0"; b=hsieA1Z+TiKn40qGYRP3uv6IojHheKX55Gy2bhlfkPkHVunEbNPP5FoSX9jtmCBE2 O4WJTB1Krv/RExTBbot6Z6SPUzeRANqRF5ZTtAr9OXt4GABcsSLsmXx6yb4n0oyCu5 mXxB824ecgPnZJqGHO6/nIeFx496kTpFhWo89QbE= Message-ID: <4E6A7B43.5080806@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:46:59 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Keusemann References: <4E6A0C1F.7090505@visi.com> <4E6A305A.1040105@visi.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6A305A.1040105@visi.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9C729E74A7A3D86F352885D0" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't log in as toor since package update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:47:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9C729E74A7A3D86F352885D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/09/2011 16:27, Paul Keusemann wrote: > I am still curious about what has changed in the last couple of weeks > though. What do these commands produce: % pw user show -n root % pw user show -n toor --- the default results look like this: root:*:0:0::0:0:Charlie &:/root:/bin/csh toor:*:0:0::0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root: (be particularly suspicious if the toor line doesn't end in your choice of shell -- a blank value gets you the default shell, which is /bin/sh) Does running # pwd_mkdb -p /etc/master.passwd improve things? Otherwise, did you run mergemaster at all during the last few weeks? Did you run mergemaster without sufficient care and attention when it asked you if it should replace your /etc/master.passwd with the default version from /usr/src? Or perhaps you attempted to merge old and new versions of master.passwd without conspicuous success? If you have managed to make mincemeat out of /etc/master.passwd, fear not. There should be a backup of the old version of file in /var/backups= Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig9C729E74A7A3D86F352885D0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5qe0wACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyTEgCfVuHsIO5muZ2cvGst2TDxDz/b cgAAnjXIE8A9TdHrjdbNwg2sIM8zBQNn =cUpD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9C729E74A7A3D86F352885D0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 21:53:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B74106564A; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 21:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B20B8FC12; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 21:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxk36 with SMTP id 36so2381368yxk.13 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.139.6 with SMTP id m6mr1756944ybd.302.1315605187761; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi.localnet ([186.212.242.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m4sm6131024ang.4.2011.09.09.14.53.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:53:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:53:08 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.6.2; amd64; ; ) References: <201109091646.15327.lobo@bsd.com.br> <032f01cc6f35$162e1390$428a3ab0$@net> In-Reply-To: <032f01cc6f35$162e1390$428a3ab0$@net> X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201109091853.09133.lobo@bsd.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VPN problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:53:09 -0000 On Friday 09 September 2011 18:11:47 Torsten Kersandt wrote: > HI Mario > I don't know what the experts are suggesting but I use a table for the VPN > addresses > To allow nat but block them frm using the server as gateway ("use as > default gateway" disabled in windows) > I add the rules dynamically using mpd if-up and if-down scripts > > All I have in my rules is GRE pass anywhere and nat to and from > where ever > > Regards > Torsten > Thanks for replying, Torsten but the problem is way before all these things that you mentioned. I'm wildly guessing here but the problem seems to be inside the NAT mechanism of PF. At least the working/not working situations point to that direction. If I don't find a solution to that soon I am gonna have no choice but to switch to IPFW, which I would not like to do because the queuing mechanisms of pf are extremely useful and handy to my networks. By the way, I also do each item that you mentioned in your post. The funny thing is that there was a time (maybe a couple csups ago) that this problem didn't occur, and I am totally unable to say which csup brought this issue in. Remeber there are 3 FBSDs involved here. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org] On > Behalf Of Mario Lobo > Sent: 09 September 2011 20:46 > To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: VPN problem > > Hi; > > I've been having this problem establishing a VPN behind a FreeBSD 8-STABLE > with pf. > > I have this scenario: > > > home LAN ---- FBSD+pf home ---- INTERNET --- FBSD+pf work --- work LAN > MPD VPN server > > nat rules on FBSD+pf home: > > > nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 > # nat on $ext_if from any to any -> ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 > > > obs- it makes no difference which nat rule I use. The problem persists. > > > These are the first 5 pf rules on FBSD+pf home: > > # pass quick all > pass quick on lo0 all > > # my whole home lan is free > pass in quick on $int_if from $int_if:network to any > > #--- Allow networks to see themselves and dns > pass quick from $int_if:network to $int_if:network > > #--- Allow vpns from anywhere to anywhere > pass in quick log on $int_if proto gre from any to any keep state > pass in quick log on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags > S/SA > keep state > > > > On any attempt to connect to the FBSD+pf work VPN Server from home LAN, > I get this (even if I uncomment pass quick all): > > #>mpd5 > Multi-link PPP daemon for FreeBSD > > process 98799 started, version 5.5 (root@Papi 16:55 3-Sep-2011) > CONSOLE: listening on 127.0.0.1 5005 > web: listening on 127.0.0.1 5006 > [B1] Bundle: Interface ng0 created > [L1] [L1] Link: OPEN event > [L1] LCP: Open event > [L1] LCP: state change Initial --> Starting > [L1] LCP: LayerStart > [L1] PPTP call successful > [L1] Link: UP event > [L1] LCP: Up event > [L1] LCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent > [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 > [L1] ACFCOMP > [L1] PROTOCOMP > [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 > [L1] MRU 1486 > [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 > > [snip..] > > [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #10 > [L1] ACFCOMP > [L1] PROTOCOMP > [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 > [L1] MRU 1486 > [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 > [L1] LCP: parameter negotiation failed > [L1] LCP: state change Req-Sent --> Stopped > [L1] LCP: LayerFinish > [L1] PPTP call terminated > [L1] Link: DOWN event > [L1] LCP: Close event > [L1] LCP: state change Stopped --> Closed > [L1] LCP: Down event > [L1] LCP: state change Closed --> Initial > > > BUT, on the 9th or 10th attempt, without touching any setting anywhere, the > VPN MAY BE established. out of nothing ! Machines (Windows, Unix, whatever) > behind both FBSD+pfs ALSO have the same problem when trying to close VPN > tunnels to outside sites. > > Sometimes, opening an ssh session from my workstation to FBSD+pf work may > "help" in establishing the VPN. > > The FBSD+pf work VPN Server is working fine. My colleagues can connect to > it > > from their homes (NATted cable modems or 3G modems) without problems. I am > the > only one behind a FBSD+pf router. > > > I installed MPD5 on FBSD+pf home, and copied mpd.conf from my home > workstation > to it. > > > Without touching a single setting on mpd.conf, the VPN is established > from FBSD+pf home (as a client) to FBSD+pf work WITHOUT any hiccups on > EVERY > > SINGLE attempt! even I bring it up/down 200 times! > > And yet, if the FBSD+pf combo is out of the way, (i.e. no NAT!, as is the > case > of FBSD+pf home as a client) or if I let my cable modem do the NAT/routing, > the problem is GONE!. > > > FreeBSD work > FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 22 14:50:42 BRT 2011 amd64 > > FreeBSD Home > FreeBSD FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed May 18 16:53:26 BRT 2011 i386 > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 22:21:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DD0106566C; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFE68FC08; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxk36 with SMTP id 36so2400267yxk.13 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.254.16 with SMTP id b16mr2467157ybi.94.1315606875511; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi.localnet ([186.212.242.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u13sm6177496anf.14.2011.09.09.15.21.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:21:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Mario Lobo To: "Torsten Kersandt" Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 19:21:16 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.6.2; amd64; ; ) References: <201109091646.15327.lobo@bsd.com.br> <201109091853.09133.lobo@bsd.com.br> <033101cc6f3c$4dfc8f20$e9f5ad60$@net> In-Reply-To: <033101cc6f3c$4dfc8f20$e9f5ad60$@net> X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201109091921.16542.lobo@bsd.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VPN problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:21:17 -0000 On Friday 09 September 2011 19:03:27 Torsten Kersandt wrote: > Hi > TUN and NG connections are not present at the time you start your server > and rules for such interfaces are not applicable to PF You're right, but on the client end that is trying to conect to that server behind a pf firewall, nat rules DO apply, and on my tests I can see for sure that when I take NAT out of the picture, the VPN tunnel is established. > > The is there the if up and if down functions of MPD come into place unless > you use IP Address/network specific rules. > One server I have in the if-up script: > > /etc/rc.d/pf resync > /sbin/pfctl -t if_pptp -T add ${4} I do all that! in fact even go beyond and use the linkup/down scripts to create a log on the server of which user(s) is(are) conected to the VPN, from which public IP, with which ng interface, at what time/date they logged in and and logged out. > > And it works perfectly fine including on the secondary MPD instance (bound > to IP address) allowing usage as default gateway functions. > Like I said before: "The FBSD+pf work VPN Server is working fine. My colleagues can connect to it from their homes (NATted cable modems or 3G modems) without problems." > Other than that I think you will have to go down the bridging line. > I may be corrected bu others :-) > > Regards > Torsten > Thanks again, Torsten. I think this issue seems to lie deeper that just pf rules and link scripts -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org] On > Behalf Of Mario Lobo > Sent: 09 September 2011 22:53 > To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: VPN problem > > On Friday 09 September 2011 18:11:47 Torsten Kersandt wrote: > > HI Mario > > I don't know what the experts are suggesting but I use a table for the > > VPN addresses > > To allow nat but block them frm using the server as gateway ("use as > > default gateway" disabled in windows) > > I add the rules dynamically using mpd if-up and if-down scripts > > > > All I have in my rules is GRE pass anywhere and nat
to and from > > where ever > > > > Regards > > Torsten > > Thanks for replying, Torsten but the problem is way before all these things > that you mentioned. I'm wildly guessing here but the problem seems to be > inside the NAT mechanism of PF. At least the working/not working situations > point to that direction. > > If I don't find a solution to that soon I am gonna have no choice but to > switch to IPFW, which I would not like to do because the queuing mechanisms > of > pf are extremely useful and handy to my networks. > > By the way, I also do each item that you mentioned in your post. > > The funny thing is that there was a time (maybe a couple csups ago) that > this > problem didn't occur, and I am totally unable to say which csup brought > this > > issue in. Remeber there are 3 FBSDs involved here. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org] > > On > > > Behalf Of Mario Lobo > > Sent: 09 September 2011 20:46 > > To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: VPN problem > > > > Hi; > > > > I've been having this problem establishing a VPN behind a FreeBSD > > 8-STABLE with pf. > > > > I have this scenario: > > > > > > home LAN ---- FBSD+pf home ---- INTERNET --- FBSD+pf work --- work LAN > > > > MPD VPN server > > > > nat rules on FBSD+pf home: > > nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 > > # nat on $ext_if from any to any -> ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 > > > > obs- it makes no difference which nat rule I use. The problem persists. > > > > These are the first 5 pf rules on FBSD+pf home: > > # pass quick all > > pass quick on lo0 all > > > > # my whole home lan is free > > pass in quick on $int_if from $int_if:network to any > > > > #--- Allow networks to see themselves and dns > > pass quick from $int_if:network to $int_if:network > > > > #--- Allow vpns from anywhere to anywhere > > pass in quick log on $int_if proto gre from any to any keep state > > pass in quick log on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags > > > > S/SA > > keep state > > > > > > > > On any attempt to connect to the FBSD+pf work VPN Server from home LAN, > > I get this (even if I uncomment pass quick all): > > > > #>mpd5 > > Multi-link PPP daemon for FreeBSD > > > > process 98799 started, version 5.5 (root@Papi 16:55 3-Sep-2011) > > CONSOLE: listening on 127.0.0.1 5005 > > web: listening on 127.0.0.1 5006 > > [B1] Bundle: Interface ng0 created > > [L1] [L1] Link: OPEN event > > [L1] LCP: Open event > > [L1] LCP: state change Initial --> Starting > > [L1] LCP: LayerStart > > [L1] PPTP call successful > > [L1] Link: UP event > > [L1] LCP: Up event > > [L1] LCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent > > [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 > > [L1] ACFCOMP > > [L1] PROTOCOMP > > [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 > > [L1] MRU 1486 > > [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 > > > > [snip..] > > > > [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #10 > > [L1] ACFCOMP > > [L1] PROTOCOMP > > [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 > > [L1] MRU 1486 > > [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 > > [L1] LCP: parameter negotiation failed > > [L1] LCP: state change Req-Sent --> Stopped > > [L1] LCP: LayerFinish > > [L1] PPTP call terminated > > [L1] Link: DOWN event > > [L1] LCP: Close event > > [L1] LCP: state change Stopped --> Closed > > [L1] LCP: Down event > > [L1] LCP: state change Closed --> Initial > > > > > > BUT, on the 9th or 10th attempt, without touching any setting anywhere, > > the > > > VPN MAY BE established. out of nothing ! Machines (Windows, Unix, > > whatever) > > > behind both FBSD+pfs ALSO have the same problem when trying to close VPN > > tunnels to outside sites. > > > > Sometimes, opening an ssh session from my workstation to FBSD+pf work may > > "help" in establishing the VPN. > > > > The FBSD+pf work VPN Server is working fine. My colleagues can connect to > > it > > > > from their homes (NATted cable modems or 3G modems) without problems. I > > am the > > only one behind a FBSD+pf router. > > > > > > I installed MPD5 on FBSD+pf home, and copied mpd.conf from my home > > workstation > > to it. > > > > > > Without touching a single setting on mpd.conf, the VPN is established > > from FBSD+pf home (as a client) to FBSD+pf work WITHOUT any hiccups on > > EVERY > > > > SINGLE attempt! even I bring it up/down 200 times! > > > > And yet, if the FBSD+pf combo is out of the way, (i.e. no NAT!, as is the > > case > > of FBSD+pf home as a client) or if I let my cable modem do the > > NAT/routing, > > > the problem is GONE!. > > > > > > FreeBSD work > > FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 22 14:50:42 BRT 2011 amd64 > > > > FreeBSD Home > > FreeBSD FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed May 18 16:53:26 BRT 2011 i386 > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 22:31:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B271065670 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:31:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torsten@cnc-london.net) Received: from mailhost.cnc-london.net (mailhost.cnc-london.net [109.200.20.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5158FC0A for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:31:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26912 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2011 23:04:22 +0100 Received: from 78-105-9-127.zone3.bethere.co.uk (HELO torstenWIN7) (torsten@cnc-london.net@78.105.9.127) by mailhost.cnc-london.net with SMTP; 9 Sep 2011 23:04:22 +0100 From: "Torsten Kersandt" To: "'Mario Lobo'" , References: <201109091646.15327.lobo@bsd.com.br> <032f01cc6f35$162e1390$428a3ab0$@net> <201109091853.09133.lobo@bsd.com.br> In-Reply-To: <201109091853.09133.lobo@bsd.com.br> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 23:03:27 +0100 Message-ID: <033101cc6f3c$4dfc8f20$e9f5ad60$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcxvOykWt66uLhtlTF2U6JULpPrtXQAAC8bQ Content-Language: en-gb Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: VPN problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:31:05 -0000 Hi TUN and NG connections are not present at the time you start your server and rules for such interfaces are not applicable to PF The is there the if up and if down functions of MPD come into place unless you use IP Address/network specific rules. One server I have in the if-up script: /etc/rc.d/pf resync /sbin/pfctl -t if_pptp -T add ${4} And it works perfectly fine including on the secondary MPD instance (bound to IP address) allowing usage as default gateway functions. Other than that I think you will have to go down the bridging line. I may be corrected bu others :-) Regards Torsten -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Mario Lobo Sent: 09 September 2011 22:53 To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VPN problem On Friday 09 September 2011 18:11:47 Torsten Kersandt wrote: > HI Mario > I don't know what the experts are suggesting but I use a table for the VPN > addresses > To allow nat but block them frm using the server as gateway ("use as > default gateway" disabled in windows) > I add the rules dynamically using mpd if-up and if-down scripts > > All I have in my rules is GRE pass anywhere and nat
to and from > where ever > > Regards > Torsten > Thanks for replying, Torsten but the problem is way before all these things that you mentioned. I'm wildly guessing here but the problem seems to be inside the NAT mechanism of PF. At least the working/not working situations point to that direction. If I don't find a solution to that soon I am gonna have no choice but to switch to IPFW, which I would not like to do because the queuing mechanisms of pf are extremely useful and handy to my networks. By the way, I also do each item that you mentioned in your post. The funny thing is that there was a time (maybe a couple csups ago) that this problem didn't occur, and I am totally unable to say which csup brought this issue in. Remeber there are 3 FBSDs involved here. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org] On > Behalf Of Mario Lobo > Sent: 09 September 2011 20:46 > To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: VPN problem > > Hi; > > I've been having this problem establishing a VPN behind a FreeBSD 8-STABLE > with pf. > > I have this scenario: > > > home LAN ---- FBSD+pf home ---- INTERNET --- FBSD+pf work --- work LAN > MPD VPN server > > nat rules on FBSD+pf home: > > > nat on $ext_if from $int_if:network to any -> ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 > # nat on $ext_if from any to any -> ($ext_if) port 1024:65535 > > > obs- it makes no difference which nat rule I use. The problem persists. > > > These are the first 5 pf rules on FBSD+pf home: > > # pass quick all > pass quick on lo0 all > > # my whole home lan is free > pass in quick on $int_if from $int_if:network to any > > #--- Allow networks to see themselves and dns > pass quick from $int_if:network to $int_if:network > > #--- Allow vpns from anywhere to anywhere > pass in quick log on $int_if proto gre from any to any keep state > pass in quick log on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port pptp flags > S/SA > keep state > > > > On any attempt to connect to the FBSD+pf work VPN Server from home LAN, > I get this (even if I uncomment pass quick all): > > #>mpd5 > Multi-link PPP daemon for FreeBSD > > process 98799 started, version 5.5 (root@Papi 16:55 3-Sep-2011) > CONSOLE: listening on 127.0.0.1 5005 > web: listening on 127.0.0.1 5006 > [B1] Bundle: Interface ng0 created > [L1] [L1] Link: OPEN event > [L1] LCP: Open event > [L1] LCP: state change Initial --> Starting > [L1] LCP: LayerStart > [L1] PPTP call successful > [L1] Link: UP event > [L1] LCP: Up event > [L1] LCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent > [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 > [L1] ACFCOMP > [L1] PROTOCOMP > [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 > [L1] MRU 1486 > [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 > > [snip..] > > [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #10 > [L1] ACFCOMP > [L1] PROTOCOMP > [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 > [L1] MRU 1486 > [L1] MAGICNUM 2d08ae01 > [L1] LCP: parameter negotiation failed > [L1] LCP: state change Req-Sent --> Stopped > [L1] LCP: LayerFinish > [L1] PPTP call terminated > [L1] Link: DOWN event > [L1] LCP: Close event > [L1] LCP: state change Stopped --> Closed > [L1] LCP: Down event > [L1] LCP: state change Closed --> Initial > > > BUT, on the 9th or 10th attempt, without touching any setting anywhere, the > VPN MAY BE established. out of nothing ! Machines (Windows, Unix, whatever) > behind both FBSD+pfs ALSO have the same problem when trying to close VPN > tunnels to outside sites. > > Sometimes, opening an ssh session from my workstation to FBSD+pf work may > "help" in establishing the VPN. > > The FBSD+pf work VPN Server is working fine. My colleagues can connect to > it > > from their homes (NATted cable modems or 3G modems) without problems. I am > the > only one behind a FBSD+pf router. > > > I installed MPD5 on FBSD+pf home, and copied mpd.conf from my home > workstation > to it. > > > Without touching a single setting on mpd.conf, the VPN is established > from FBSD+pf home (as a client) to FBSD+pf work WITHOUT any hiccups on > EVERY > > SINGLE attempt! even I bring it up/down 200 times! > > And yet, if the FBSD+pf combo is out of the way, (i.e. no NAT!, as is the > case > of FBSD+pf home as a client) or if I let my cable modem do the NAT/routing, > the problem is GONE!. > > > FreeBSD work > FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 22 14:50:42 BRT 2011 amd64 > > FreeBSD Home > FreeBSD FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed May 18 16:53:26 BRT 2011 i386 > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks, _______________________________________________ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 07:52:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5009C1065694 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 07:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@paz.bz) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [207.34.147.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368CD8FC19 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 07:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 100-236-53-209.qcislands.net ([209.53.236.100] helo=[192.168.1.4]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1R2HoY-000O94-Ff; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:17:23 -0700 Message-ID: <4E6B0EFD.1070007@paz.bz> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:17:17 -0700 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (100) Subject: enlarge a filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 07:52:58 -0000 I have a drive with two filesystems. /dev/da1s1d 412G 337G 42G 89% and /dev/da1s1e 130G 19M 119G 0% I need the space on da1s1e. Does FreeBSD have any mechanism to enlarge s1d after I delete s1e ? Would GParted be able to do this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 08:17:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8801065670 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632648FC0A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p8A8HVkO022793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:17:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p8A8HVkO022793 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315642652; bh=iVaJTZsvc/myGYyN546KnEDUVYsXwQZBep6ndsGVkIc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E6B1D13.4090109@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S at,=2010=20Sep=202011=2009:17:23=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.2)=20Gecko/2 0110902=20Thunderbird/6.0.2|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Jim=20Pazare na=20|CC:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:= 20Re:=20enlarge=20a=20filesystem|References:=20<4E6B0EFD.1070007@p az.bz>|In-Reply-To:=20<4E6B0EFD.1070007@paz.bz>|X-Enigmail-Version :=201.3.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signe d=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-si gnature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigDB05EF504E1AD0E13D 95E124"; b=zlvgX+XX8RIdEF+ggAeVm9OAwzVwd29Xu+IEfANYsvi2AikciKFTXfItGsQWdYXd2 TT2yvHqwWbkEcVlU+kPjQA2Qs8EjRjm7WQ6Ar8LFVQeFoaUMPP6OY2bMi+jiuJYl/y UjS8D161t7S8BSEInb3byMAiN7zHBhLkSHLi4EX0= Message-ID: <4E6B1D13.4090109@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:17:23 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Pazarena References: <4E6B0EFD.1070007@paz.bz> In-Reply-To: <4E6B0EFD.1070007@paz.bz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDB05EF504E1AD0E13D95E124" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: enlarge a filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:17:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDB05EF504E1AD0E13D95E124 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/09/2011 08:17, Jim Pazarena wrote: > I have a drive with two filesystems. > /dev/da1s1d 412G 337G 42G 89% > and > /dev/da1s1e 130G 19M 119G 0% >=20 > I need the space on da1s1e. >=20 > Does FreeBSD have any mechanism to enlarge > s1d after I delete s1e ? These are normal FreeBSD UFS2 filesystems? Does the s1e partition follow the s1d partition physically on the disk -- look at the partition layout using bsdlabel to check that? If so, then yes. growfs(8) is your friend. The procedure is to edit the disk label to remove the s1e partition and extend the s1d partition to fill the released space. Then use growfs to expand the filesystem to fill up the partition. Of course, make sure your data is very well backed up before you do anything else. bsdlabel and growfs are tools that work at very low levels of the system and that can cause complete mayhem with the slightest mistake. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigDB05EF504E1AD0E13D95E124 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5rHRsACgkQ8Mjk52CukIz/uACcCIvZNztvDjbjSrv6RGsaQ8Rb ZwcAnijY3si6IbRDbhxGnJC04+jK7F6S =Rs51 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDB05EF504E1AD0E13D95E124-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 09:47:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4D6106566B for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2138FC14 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039AF5E17F; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:48:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.458 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.458 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id LAbTs3JEGqWH; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:47:58 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E451B5E1A7; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:47:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E6B324F.8030700@eskk.nu> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:47:59 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110907 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <4E6A3504.6020002@eskk.nu> <20110909191726.4af3e660@debiand1.localdom.ain> <4E6A6152.5070703@eskk.nu> <20110909222951.45a29861.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110909222951.45a29861.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Rares Aioanei Subject: Re: Printing from Firefox broken after update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:47:46 -0000 2011-09-09 22:29, Polytropon skrev: > On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:56:18 +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: >> 2011-09-09 18:17, Rares Aioanei skrev: >>> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:47:16 +0200 >>> Leslie Jensen wrote: >>> >>>> /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops failed >>> >>> Does the file exist? >>> >> >> >> Yes! >> >> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 20112 9 Sep 09:12 >> /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops > > Try to run it manually. Take a PDF file and convert it into > PS. Add options you might need for paper size. > > Example: > > % /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops -paper A4 test.pdf > > and check the PS output. > > See "man pdftops" for details. Maybe it's a dependency problem > of pdftops... > > Note that the "normal" pdftops binary is provided by the > xpdf port. Maybe you can try to update this one too? I'm > not sure if CUPS's own binary is in some relation to that > port, or is it working independently? > > > First I did portmaster -t -f graphics/xpdf Then rehash Tried the following both as root and as myself I had to add a user and number of copies to the command. /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops les 1 -paper A4 test.pdf which results in the following DEBUG: pdftops - copying to temp print file "/tmp/034c34e6e4d2f" and it never exits. I have to stop with ctrl-c the file is empty. ll /tmp/034c34e6e4d2f -rw------- 1 les wheel 0 10 Sep 08:01 /tmp/034c34e6e4d2f And my test file is ll test.pdf -rw-r--r-- 1 les les 30263 10 Sep 07:58 test.pdf So what do you suggest I do now? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 11:20:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40330106564A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:20:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arab@tangerine-army.co.uk) Received: from queueout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (queueout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C306D8FC0C for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.3]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20110910105716.ESHB17426.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net> for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:57:16 +0100 Received: from [94.168.169.90] (helo=mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl) by know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R2LFM-0008Gr-5o for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:57:16 +0100 Received: from mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl ([::1]) by mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl ([::1]) with mapi; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:53:49 +0100 From: Graeme Dargie To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:53:48 +0100 Thread-Topic: Samba question Thread-Index: Acxvp+Q7N12rWp01RVOXLKPk8KkuBw== Message-ID: <0EE458C34045A44DBC2CA2DC5CEB42B5232131B947@mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl> Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=JvdXmxIgLJv2/GthKqHpGJEEHukvLcvELVXUanXFreg= c=1 sm=0 a=OMdUhd4NiskA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=HbBEoTncbnsnB_q1x6QA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=-Z_ESkUHHJzl27cFhYoA:7 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Samba question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:20:53 -0000 Hi All I am sure there is a simple answer to this but I google has not overly help= ed. I am trying to mount a samba share that is on a FreeBSD 8.2 server to anoth= er FreeBSD 8.2 server, Mount_smbfs -I //user@host/share /mountpoint It then asks for a password, I enter the users password and then get mount_= smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr =3D Authentication error Dmesg is showing smb_co_lock: recursive lock for object 1 I have samba integrated with Active Directory, so I then thought ah maybe a= dding the user to AD would help, so I have done so using the same password = etc still no joy, I have make sure the user has access rights on the samba = share, restarted samba and the same error persists, any ideas ? Regards Graeme From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 07:06:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C11E1065670 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 07:06:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren780@yahoo.com) Received: from nm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 665458FC13 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 07:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.69] by nm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Sep 2011 06:52:14 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.20] by tm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Sep 2011 06:52:14 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1020.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Sep 2011 06:52:14 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 944738.1603.bm@omp1020.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 34044 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Sep 2011 06:52:14 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1315637534; bh=zKZ8F2xWxXPQV2Nez51wLL12i+5tcu0YQkshZQWFTIc=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1sUJ+4wrJe8D6aAa4x4UPyHlkrSRFXlip1i5V9H8uoixwt/W0wF7sH/DDqBYWpc0rkjnxzXUdstXNHgfcd06K/C5Mcs04fTzIgQkvkk625SyU+T0qtWzApp2DSUxOtQMzb65X26lAB0SD7atyYcnQqgbm05FiXYZYeQ5GOiqL+4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BA7LPANHWzmIOTI2DQOklmx6HNCKymSawmn81H23OE7o272QmC/PJbJ7qkfz3vD/w/GSVcqDIRxf0R59aBcQOsR3mZNb6Smrr0/jFmNFdNV1ly6yEENCLlJxsDpHEHLqzwrL33PYe/wtW+RLeJiyIHkaDF9QuJAQAoEsYWSK0+o=; X-YMail-OSG: BAfB0VYVM1nxl7Mqruk4nTU2Z.JuGJvn.5GGfvbSV0UJwEm rOcG4Kk8KoelCJfPULMZuyfleReL_QTnBb6tfgqdCvwVmS62iJqNlb.7axZJ SUemoJ7YyOq88Fawwf9ksgkUPzi2.0exf3IGzOPXn.Y15mNQSN8WyDRBEAfI WccF7cuZz.PYJxLVKo2cBUnSiWBWMhUfdmLevvFBcPJADsokfIHJZiN0zRpr uULXpv5J85KJHWtNJjgE.5Ndnxq38k3RxtnfBk4hudAyHDrA9GnoWVxzaAqy n8vXYUnpBbBwbDPQLkuyYbasql5fNlmqT9xPxx8IEi3LPy.w5ZTNPSWMcukw slGfzn2NINEsjaRvqin83YtgS2wCedpl5FYXMI1RR6s7X47b6tQdMxV_x5I4 IzZPNIgDJbAwD1keHWf183XjDpqVsLRIGMpzUdqOOyUt9tj9KU0i5oJhtFzF 8qQ-- Received: from [68.150.134.117] by web112002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 23:52:14 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.113.315625 Message-ID: <1315637534.28439.YahooMailNeo@web112002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 23:52:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mr. Darren" To: freebsdq MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:46:19 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Mumble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Mr. Darren" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 07:06:16 -0000 I am trying to install Mumble on a headless FreeBSD server which has no nee= d for X11.=A0 Why is this port trying to install X11?=A0 Seems like it shou= ldn't be needed.=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 12:14:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43EC1065673 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107508FC1B for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p8ACE4ri078681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:14:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p8ACE4ri078681 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315656844; bh=IxSmIt1JT725QeVRq77Z7adG3LPBO8hD8QzfuvN+nyE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E6B5485.8000605@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S at,=2010=20Sep=202011=2013:13:57=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.2)=20Gecko/2 0110902=20Thunderbird/6.0.2|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20"Mr.=20Darre n"=20|CC:=20freebsdq=20|Subject:=20Re:=20Mumble|References:=20<1315637534.28439. YahooMailNeo@web112002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<1315637 534.28439.YahooMailNeo@web112002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>|X-Enigmail-Ve rsion:=201.3.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/ signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/p gp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig21C92DC5E0F49 1C5BE9E8486"; b=W+i9ELfIxif+TxQgrjl32xvbP0r5M/5pUMAvoLRQU3ZxWWN+i1eLhgU8vakCMoYZn MWkwihaF3tSnh84bqQMLbvo+7NVec1BGflWCyEfL8VZ/x/5lCN443dDHFrgAL4qfMm 1qhrvbqx+6if+0gWm+h1OtZ2dY5QpwqvtnfNDF0E= Message-ID: <4E6B5485.8000605@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:13:57 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mr. Darren" References: <1315637534.28439.YahooMailNeo@web112002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1315637534.28439.YahooMailNeo@web112002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig21C92DC5E0F491C5BE9E8486" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsdq Subject: Re: Mumble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:14:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig21C92DC5E0F491C5BE9E8486 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/09/2011 07:52, Mr. Darren wrote: > I am trying to install Mumble on a headless FreeBSD server which has > no need for X11. Why is this port trying to install X11? Seems like > it shouldn't be needed. Is that X libraries or the X server it's trying to install? The first is perfectly reasonable -- it's useful in general to be able to install an application which uses the X protocol to connect to a remote X server for its display, even if the machine where the application is installed is never going to have any sort of graphical display itself. If it's trying to install an X server, then something is a bit whiffy in the state of Denmark. That shouldn't happen in the ports without good reason. Also, you can turn off X11 support in audio/mumble using the OPTIONS framework -- use 'make config' to bring up the blue and grey dialogue. (The default is to turn off X11 support in mumble, but that doesn't necessarily mean that dependencies won't require X11 support...) Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig21C92DC5E0F491C5BE9E8486 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5rVIwACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzwGACeJsk7zVt3rTTrzkisGteRyVEh WmgAnjSshw/209BhX0nVYqCRn68dGL8k =3ii3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig21C92DC5E0F491C5BE9E8486-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 12:24:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDE1106566B for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6158FC08 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxi39 with SMTP id 39so2616000vxi.13 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 05:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.98.137 with SMTP id ei9mr535917vdb.72.1315657489159; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 05:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-105-057.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.105.57]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ed7sm1009665vdc.17.2011.09.10.05.24.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 05:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3RwvjV5DBTz2CG44 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:24:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:24:46 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110910082446.0e8280eb@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4E6B324F.8030700@eskk.nu> References: <4E6A3504.6020002@eskk.nu> <20110909191726.4af3e660@debiand1.localdom.ain> <4E6A6152.5070703@eskk.nu> <20110909222951.45a29861.freebsd@edvax.de> <4E6B324F.8030700@eskk.nu> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Printing from Firefox broken after update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:24:52 -0000 On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:47:59 +0200 Leslie Jensen articulated: > 2011-09-09 22:29, Polytropon skrev: > > On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:56:18 +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: > >> 2011-09-09 18:17, Rares Aioanei skrev: > >>> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:47:16 +0200 > >>> Leslie Jensen wrote: > >>> > >>>> /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops failed > >>> > >>> Does the file exist? > >> > >> Yes! > >> > >> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 20112 9 Sep 09:12 > >> /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops > > > > Try to run it manually. Take a PDF file and convert it into > > PS. Add options you might need for paper size. > > > > Example: > > > > % /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops -paper A4 test.pdf > > > > and check the PS output. > > > > See "man pdftops" for details. Maybe it's a dependency problem > > of pdftops... > > > > Note that the "normal" pdftops binary is provided by the > > xpdf port. Maybe you can try to update this one too? I'm > > not sure if CUPS's own binary is in some relation to that > > port, or is it working independently? > > > > > > > > First I did > > portmaster -t -f graphics/xpdf > > Then rehash > > Tried the following both as root and as myself > > I had to add a user and number of copies to the command. > > /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter/pdftops les 1 -paper A4 test.pdf > > which results in the following > > DEBUG: pdftops - copying to temp print file "/tmp/034c34e6e4d2f" > > and it never exits. I have to stop with ctrl-c > > > the file is empty. > > ll /tmp/034c34e6e4d2f > -rw------- 1 les wheel 0 10 Sep 08:01 /tmp/034c34e6e4d2f > > And my test file is > > ll test.pdf > -rw-r--r-- 1 les les 30263 10 Sep 07:58 test.pdf > > So what do you suggest I do now? I am not sure exactly what your problem is; however, after the Firefox update, printing now takes forever. I use to be able to click on print and have a document print virtually immediately. Now, I click print and have time to eat breakfast, take a shower and get dressed before the frigging thing prints out. This is definitely NOT a printer problem since the printer is connected via a network to a Windows machine. Clicking on the same document in IE results in the document being printed immediately. Somehow, somewhere, something got seriously broken in Firefox. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 14:34:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9354D1065675 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:34:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arab@tangerine-army.co.uk) Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015028FC0C for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.2]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20110910143455.JFKP9871.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net> for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:34:55 +0100 Received: from [94.168.169.90] (helo=mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl) by know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R2Odz-0004fy-EN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:34:55 +0100 Received: from mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl ([::1]) by mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl ([::1]) with mapi; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:31:21 +0100 From: Graeme Dargie To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:31:20 +0100 Thread-Topic: serviio Thread-Index: AcxvxkRaWkuObHkST+WA6R3qCkBWOg== Message-ID: <0EE458C34045A44DBC2CA2DC5CEB42B5232131B948@mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl> Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=R50lirqlHffDPPkwUlkuVa99MrvKdVWo//yz83qex8g= c=1 sm=0 a=OMdUhd4NiskA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=eXFvDLgcSbbfI8Cd-GUA:9 a=BQB3h4V-EcFKplJXeSoA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=zdBZPt08VcoHnXc_ShAA:9 a=H7AwxGHBgcMcDupw7NMA:7 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: serviio X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:34:57 -0000 Has anyone any experience with this media streaming port, their forums are = helpful but largely if you are using linux / os X / win, not much on FreeBS= D? Feel free to discuss off list if you feel it to be more appropriate. Regards Graeme From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 15:27:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB78106564A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: from mailhost.ssr.com (mailhost.ssr.com [199.4.235.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BE458FC0A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52539 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2011 15:22:15 -0000 Received: from pool-71-167-240-59.nycmny.east.verizon.net (HELO irelay.ssr.com) (sdb@71.167.240.59) by 199.4.235.5 with SMTP; 10 Sep 2011 15:22:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 70167 invoked by uid 103); 10 Sep 2011 15:12:19 -0000 Date: 10 Sep 2011 15:12:19 -0000 Message-ID: <20110910151219.70166.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> From: Scott Ballantyne To: Matthew Seaman In-reply-to: <4E6A7762.4050508@infracaninophile.co.uk> (message from Matthew Seaman on Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:30:26 +0100) References: <20110909141315.96273.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> <4E6A7762.4050508@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -r libnotify-0 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:27:06 -0000 Hi Mathew, > On 09/09/2011 15:13, Scott Ballantyne wrote: > > I've been trying to update libnotify and libproxy following the > > instructions in UPDATING, which is to do > > > > portmaster -r libnotify-0 > > > > This trys to install ghostscript9, and fails. Apparently ghostscript9 > > conflicts with ghostscript8-8.71_6, which presumably is the reason for > > the failure. > > > > Could someone help me resolve this? The obvious solution of pkg_delete > > ghostscript8-8.71_6 doesn't work, because too many installed ports > > depend on ghostscript8-8.71_6. > > There are two approaches you might take here. Either > > * replace ghostscript8 with ghostscript9 > > or > > * work out why libnotify triggers a dependency on ghostscript9 > and try and make it use ghostscript8 (or nothing) instead. > > The first is a relatively mechanical process, which should work fine > from the point of view of doing all the port wrangling, but might result > in further ghostscript8 vs ghostscript9 problems down the line. > Just run: > > # portmaster -o print/ghostscript9 ghostscript8- > > That will change the dependency settings in your /var/db/pkg directory, > which may or may not be appropriate for all ghostscript dependent ports, > and indeed some may not work at all. (Although I rather doubt the > simply not-working thing: functionality between those versions hasn't > changed much at all.) > > The second is a more satisfying fix. Lets see... Try defining > > WITH_GHOSTSCRIPT_VER=8 > > in /etc/make.conf (the default is 9 nowadays) -- then try reinstalling > libnotify according to the instructions in UPDATING. > > Read /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk for the details -- search for GHOSTSCRIPT > to find the relevant bits. > Thanks so much, I am in your debt. However, I also feel that I am in maze of twisty little passages, all different. The next step here is to portmaster -r libproxy-0, where I get: ----------- ===>>> Currently installed version: libproxy-0.4.6 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/net/libproxy ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports ===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for net/libproxy in background ===>>> Gathering dependency list for net/libproxy from ports ===>>> Initial dependency check complete for net/libproxy ===>>> Checking ports that depend on libproxy-0.4.6 ===>>> Launching child to reinstall alacarte-0.13.2_1 libproxy-0.4.6 >> alacarte-0.13.2_1 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/deskutils/alacarte ===>>> No DISTINFO_FILE in /usr/ports/x11-themes/gnome-art ===>>> Aborting update Terminated Terminated ===>>> Update for alacarte-0.13.2_1 failed ===>>> Aborting update -------------- gnome-art is peculiar. There is nothing in that directory but the work directory, no makefile or anything. And nothing I can find in UPDATE about alacarte or gnome-art. Any further thoughts, if you have time? Thanks again, Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 15:41:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16B0106566B for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EE98FC15 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p8AFfWDL003333 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:41:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p8AFfWDL003333 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1315669292; bh=Djv7GJcCn7rAWj8dDz29zt//5XE6MY61cVWIAFppUlM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E6B8525.9030003@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S at,=2010=20Sep=202011=2016:41:25=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.2)=20Gecko/2 0110902=20Thunderbird/6.0.2|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Scott=20Ball antyne=20|CC:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject :=20Re:=20portmaster=20-r=20libnotify-0=20problems|References:=20< 20110909141315.96273.qmail@irelay.ssr.com>=20<4E6A7762.4050508@inf racaninophile.co.uk>=20<20110910151219.70166.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> |In-Reply-To:=20<20110910151219.70166.qmail@irelay.ssr.com>|X-Enig mail-Version:=201.3.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20mul tipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"applic ation/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigCA7E6E D4FA8A63003270A059"; b=HkRetBjJCIMvNdCyKXDknKj7HU7Ewg2FAlYYilmsUwqfVRknGNVfRzNkxFZGoWbtJ LiAzCTVKPw3pDGoWjYrwJkkl03uwUEA/Pw9hgcAnDaHfIi/1MK1Dcr0VY90yyTtDrA yURirxcBixjVp/LP6pVkMh345aCeNKw2nmmNU/V8= Message-ID: <4E6B8525.9030003@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:41:25 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Ballantyne References: <20110909141315.96273.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> <4E6A7762.4050508@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20110910151219.70166.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> In-Reply-To: <20110910151219.70166.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCA7E6ED4FA8A63003270A059" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -r libnotify-0 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:41:41 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCA7E6ED4FA8A63003270A059 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/09/2011 16:12, Scott Ballantyne wrote: > gnome-art is peculiar. There is nothing in that directory but the work > directory, no makefile or anything. And nothing I can find in UPDATE > about alacarte or gnome-art. >=20 > Any further thoughts, if you have time? That is an ex-port. lucid-nonsense:/usr/ports:# grep gnome-art MOVED x11-themes/gnome-art||2011-08-02|Has expired: Upcoming ruby-gnome removes dependencies Kicked the bucket, shuffled off this mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleeding choir invisible. Suggest you update your ports tree using csup(1) or portsnap(1) -- if necessary by blowing away what you already have under /usr/ports and starting from scratch. Seems that your current tree is in an inconsistent state. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigCA7E6ED4FA8A63003270A059 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5rhSwACgkQ8Mjk52CukIy6aQCgkxgWfK5RqP5wjH2wNQL2HNqa fS4An3R2wuxhiDj4PT3FWowT3ix8TyZO =U5bC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCA7E6ED4FA8A63003270A059-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 16:22:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AD3106564A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8858FC14 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:22:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=6nKBcVa7R1Q8p2evkiL3+l543q2Y1sPcR1DNHB16Rds=; b=eCG26nA6bwoswOjpirVv1/4d0aWzYZYRzWmvZYYtGK4tfJ3ynBfBiQbM3aWqKWDrhwyPEvlSC51qZs0868JtrbIpcpgkuzZeIfGWQwovzAcpT6hMDnvIxs/mN+pCwA7LWjxXlrGFDd9dtCC30FEGB3veoVXnDjW3+RUi+kzj9Ys= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:22:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4E6B8EB0.8070303@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:22:08 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2011 16:22:10.0295 (UTC) FILETIME=[CA7F2870:01CC6FD5] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: Subject: returning to 8.2 from 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:22:10 -0000 Have test pc. Been running 8.2 just fine. Installed 9.0 from cd and after playing around tried to reinstall 8.2. Got error about GTP table while trying to setup the HD. Used 8.0 livecd to "dd if=/del/zero of=/dev/ad0 count=5 to wipe the start of the HD clean. Now 8.2 install issues this msg GEOM: ad0: the primary GPT table is corrupt or invalid. How do I fix the HD so 8.2 will install? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 16:56:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E1C1065672 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:56:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502438FC12 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id p8AGhP2q049962 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:43:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 164 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A214E20488 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:44:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 8D34A40DE; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:44:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:44:01 +0200 From: Michel Talon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110910164401.GA89611@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4E6B93D2.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4E6B93D2.001/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Subject: Re: returning to 8.2 from 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:56:36 -0000 Fbsd8 wrote: > How do I fix the HD so 8.2 will install? man gpart, in particular the RECOVERING section. there are 2 copies of the GPT you have erased only one. See gpart recover and gpart destroy. By the way FreeBSD-8.2 has the gpart utility so i suppose installation on GPT is possible. And as far as i have seen, FreeBSD9 seems an extremely nice release, with tons of exciting new stuff. The new installer is *very* efficient, the system is fast, even with witness, I don't see many reasons to come back to 8.2. -- Michel TALON From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 17:14:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB04106566B for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: from mailhost.ssr.com (mailhost.ssr.com [199.4.235.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCA338FC0A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90849 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2011 17:09:18 -0000 Received: from pool-71-167-240-59.nycmny.east.verizon.net (HELO irelay.ssr.com) (sdb@71.167.240.59) by 199.4.235.5 with SMTP; 10 Sep 2011 17:09:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 70677 invoked by uid 103); 10 Sep 2011 16:59:22 -0000 Date: 10 Sep 2011 16:59:22 -0000 Message-ID: <20110910165922.70676.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> From: Scott Ballantyne To: Matthew Seaman In-reply-to: <4E6B8525.9030003@infracaninophile.co.uk> (message from Matthew Seaman on Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:41:25 +0100) References: <20110909141315.96273.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> <4E6A7762.4050508@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20110910151219.70166.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> <4E6B8525.9030003@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -r libnotify-0 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:14:09 -0000 > > On 10/09/2011 16:12, Scott Ballantyne wrote: > > gnome-art is peculiar. There is nothing in that directory but the work > > directory, no makefile or anything. And nothing I can find in UPDATE > > about alacarte or gnome-art. > >=20 > > Any further thoughts, if you have time? > > That is an ex-port. > > lucid-nonsense:/usr/ports:# grep gnome-art MOVED > x11-themes/gnome-art||2011-08-02|Has expired: Upcoming ruby-gnome > removes dependencies > > Kicked the bucket, shuffled off this mortal coil, run down the curtain > and joined the bleeding choir invisible. > > Suggest you update your ports tree using csup(1) or portsnap(1) -- if > necessary by blowing away what you already have under /usr/ports and > starting from scratch. Seems that your current tree is in an > inconsistent state. > Thanks again, Mathew. I csuped already, but will nuke the ports and start again. Thanks again so much for your generous help. Scott -- sdb@ssr.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 17:49:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4710B106564A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:49:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFDD8FC13 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:49:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=XvfYiOtoNjo3uZL9vglaTTOBoXIzALcQwDf8n2bqLJQ=; b=b/hC/9XU982IiPPlWN2RJ537PxBc5CwH1FVul4cGNeXCleOteFitE5QGTdR9+bDgb3NNfx8VY00ftS2EE4XbGRqnL292uLfEXiTTMbs6QIly/a94wj5aDSBD9ucdL9pcQVuAkI9WoqlBR5pQLY2sr4T6SyLjQWuGWwP6oDo/l8I= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:49:24 -0700 Message-ID: <4E6BA322.8090901@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:49:22 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel Talon References: <20110910164401.GA89611@lpthe.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20110910164401.GA89611@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2011 17:49:24.0509 (UTC) FILETIME=[FA54D4D0:01CC6FE1] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: returning to 8.2 from 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:49:24 -0000 Michel Talon wrote: > Fbsd8 wrote: > >> How do I fix the HD so 8.2 will install? > > man gpart, in particular the RECOVERING section. there are 2 copies of > the GPT you have erased only one. See gpart recover and gpart destroy. > > By the way FreeBSD-8.2 has the gpart utility so i suppose installation > on GPT is possible. And as far as i have seen, FreeBSD9 seems an > extremely nice release, with tons of exciting new stuff. The new > installer is *very* efficient, the system is fast, even with witness, > I don't see many reasons to come back to 8.2. > After erasing the front of the HD nether 9.0 or 8.2 will install. Can I use livecd dd command to erase the second copy of the GPT? Where is it at? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 17:58:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA1F1065735 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unix.hacker@comcast.net) Received: from qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599358FC12 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.74]) by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Wxtg1h0011c6gX8595yvfP; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:58:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([68.61.31.42]) by omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id X5yt1h01U0uXiss3j5yuzx; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:58:54 +0000 Message-ID: <4E6BA55D.2050302@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:58:53 -0400 From: Allen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <077CA7AC-CEC6-4AFE-95C7-2596E2A359FD@cooperationireland.org> In-Reply-To: <077CA7AC-CEC6-4AFE-95C7-2596E2A359FD@cooperationireland.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: A quality operating system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0000 On 9/6/2011 10:44 AM, Michael Doyle wrote: > Lots of other people have given good answers. I'm just chiming in on > points 3 and 7 > > On 20 Aug 2011, at 05:47, Evan Busch wrote: > >> "What is a quality operating system?" > > I work as a database developer in an SME. I support end users on Mac OSX > and Windows XP .. Windows Vista > clients, and Windows 2008, FreeBSD and SuSE linux servers. > > Of these, the FreeBSD servers give least trouble. > For non-techie users, usually but not always the OS X people have fewer > problems. I collect OSs, and I've always found the ideal of an OS interesting, so I try to use as many as I can. Of the massive amount of OSs I own, my favorites, have always been these: For Windows - Windows 2000, Windows 7 Linux - Slackware SuSE Debian Mandriva when they don't screw it up. SUSE is my favorite though by far. I used it for a LONG time as my main OS, and I've LOVED it. I also used it on my Laptop, and on my Servers, and not once had any real issues. I did have to help a few people new to it realize that Yast2 came in a non-GUI style too, by simply typing "yast" while in an X-Term, or, without a GUI loaded at all with a normal shell. I also love the Dependency tracking it had when I used it on my Servers where I was doing something as a project; I could set up a machine to do testing on, where I would have an FTP Server running, SSH running, and so on, and then, also use it as a Desktop, just to see how it would run. Well, when you have that much crap installed, if you realize any given package is giving you problems, or you don't like it, and want to get rid of it, you could simply click on "Check Dependencies" and even while installing, it would look at everything you'd selected, and if it found anything, pop up a menu that allowed you to get rid of what you wanted, and then it would show you if anything would break when you did so, and, allow you to either get rid of those as well, or, select new options. I wish FreeBSD did this but ah well. FreeBSD is my favorite BSD in general, but I am starting to LOVE PC-BSD, which is basically FreeBSD with some really nice tools, and a pretty paint job, from what I've seen so far. >> In his view, and now mine, a quality operating system is reliable, >> streamlined and clearly organized. > > That is hard to disagree with Yea, I'd have to agree with a few of my own thoughts: In MY person view, a good OS, is one that can do what you want it to do, AND what you NEED it to do, isn't overly complex for no reason, is stable, AND secure. Reliability and Stability, being related, is something I take very VERY high up. I don't like unstable OSs. And I've tried quite a few. When I used to be in college, there was a guy there who LOVED Windows. And I couldn't understand how someone who was, by all means, fairly intelligent, could think it was even OK for a Server OS like Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition, came, with a default install, WITH WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER!!! I mean first, I get that they'd want to make that available if it was needed for something.... But, an ENTERPRISE EDITION OS coming out of the box, with Windows Media Player installed by default.... Why???? Why would a Server need a Media Player? And why would they allow one that's had a host of security issues over the years? I couldn't understand that at all, and still can't, since the guy I mentioned, could never give a good enough excuse. Especially considering that a Server should not EVER have down time because the admin had to install patches for a MEDIA PLAYER, and then, was required to reboot the damn thing because of it. >> >> (3) Horrible documentation. >> >> This is my specialty and has been since the early 1980s. The FreeBSD >> documentation is wordy, disorganized, inconsistent and highly >> selective in what it mentions. It is not the product of professionals >> but it also not the product of volunteers with a focus on >> communication. It seems pro-forma, as in, "it's in the documentation, >> so don't bother me." The web site compounds this error by pointing us >> in multiple directions instead of to a singular resource. It is bad >> enough that man pages are separate from your main documentation tree, >> but now you have doubled or trebled the workload required of you >> without any benefit to the end user. > > I personally find the documentation that comes as part of the install > and the documentation on the > FreeBSD website EASIER to use and more complete than any alternatives I > use on a regular basis. I've seen some bad documentation in my time, but FreeBSD, has rarely been a culprit... The FreeBSD Docs that are installed, are great, and then, the books you can buy, are amazing. I own every book you can get from the FreeBSD Mall, except a PC-BSD book. I think there may be ONE other, but other than those two, I own them all. And I Love them. My favorite is a toss up between "The Complete FreeBSD" and "FreeBSD Unleashed". The Web site is also great, and the search function, works better than some. >> (7) Disorganized website. > > Again, what are you comparing it to? > I can often find my way to exactly the information I am looking for on > the FreeBSD site using > the search tool and menu structure within that site. > > To search for answers about Windows server, Windows desktop or OSX > problems, I tend to rely > on external search engines (Bing, Google) to trawl through the sites, > and it takes longer to find the answers > I need Yea I don't think this was something that I'd complain about. The FreeBSD website is great. I DO miss the oldschool look of it that they changed years ago, but, it's STILL not only a great looking page, it's got a good search feature to dig up what you want fast. -Allen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 18:49:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF218106564A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodolpho.eckhardt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954088FC0A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxk36 with SMTP id 36so2881003yxk.13 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:49:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key:user-agent; bh=mMVVz5OtM+kQ4RgccmGfJmItppvCyeE8SvmVTmRxHhE=; b=V4IBj4OXaSvNXVlWO2b5I1avIxtiU6KxaeJxBhRBefxLQpB2XFr6TfvxTQSNzTrH1i fK7rXOPv+W8VSBm7AbddqWbN7iHwBv+7CUe3Fh2/YJJHD23kXG0E7Ybet9AUr+liWHmj X1f3pfCrsCLAEpVSYjIWr7bjJUXGTKhKAQl2k= Received: by 10.236.78.196 with SMTP id g44mr18986105yhe.43.1315678776836; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gondor.rodolphoeck.com ([187.38.166.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y79sm6325368yhg.23.2011.09.10.11.19.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gondor.rodolphoeck.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) rodolpho.eckhardt@gmail.com; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:19:33 -0300 (BRT) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:19:30 -0300 From: Rodolpho Henrique Orlovsky Eckhardt To: Fbsd8 Message-ID: <20110910181930.GA2346@woden.rodolphoeck.com> References: <20110910164401.GA89611@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4E6BA322.8090901@a1poweruser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E6BA322.8090901@a1poweruser.com> X-PGP-Key: https://keys.rodolphoeck.com.br/rodolpho.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Michel Talon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: returning to 8.2 from 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:49:05 -0000 --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13:49 Sat 10 Sep , Fbsd8 wrote: > After erasing the front of the HD nether 9.0 or 8.2 will install. > Can I use livecd dd command to erase the second copy of the GPT? > Where is it at? Try "gpart destroy -F ". You should be able to recreate a GPT or MBR = scheme after that. --=20 Rodolpho Eckhardt http://rodolphoeck.com --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOa6oyAAoJEKTP4AdsVjfnYRIP/0/be8UGRnHyvVPGOTA+VWt4 VgGrGusXR8JaHBtzsLYQFkj3haWTJwsvWNYFNzLkB9d6Dxj/CCTGZVsLwpm5ZE6m 0WFOuD6+tV/Ief84rMqiCJPBR4hMMvUrOiNicmkdimeCqfY/6CLV9saJlSNNtFh1 np7hPzX0QqHiV07Oovff+fD/tO1ff/kNoK5ks9CYCVrLgl2c05/vlKPSoPCOfB3N O1ucMjAJo0VpL75JJfjXFIMkkVTPgIrZea4jemS0FygLZfXLuR/SMqP7xcQfhDUy znmqL4NM8G/i+3yTwWEZrH0kxRBeAAjRTxJ5e+EE/+wA/IvhYfp2AsE9+6GDph3O SvxHY/lZHq/Bj7LkH7sNredLtlVz0KrOaTG26cmPiRS1akLlFbBW0h9r6x+VGQp1 BDnvYcSdA189O3SSempBzFRWlePv0bvzPIbk57ZNgdcgC6NjIa3wZ0RnoKPvHHDl fOXEGAGkcduzJch2dDSzHajVwa+ctlPU21RZlfT2340V3TMUB4NaY3JCLYQ22RrS NiqpI86LNAeRJGpyL1bi2B1F35BS0JivoOnx6RELyZQn0ioVSs7ntLE/YY+Ixaw7 suFXKh7i54cnpAY1yTfbX/7lESFEepqJ/bvxudsctJqoIZUK/cXCOQBZL4Qvz5tM SF7GTRoKTpb/THCKtlKP =FXda -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 18:51:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5B4106564A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9998FC15 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id p8AIoX5x060021 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:50:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 164 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452F120488 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:51:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 3138240DE; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:51:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:51:10 +0200 From: Michel Talon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110910185110.GA92641@lpthe.jussieu.fr> References: <20110910164401.GA89611@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4E6BA322.8090901@a1poweruser.com> <20110910181930.GA2346@woden.rodolphoeck.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110910181930.GA2346@woden.rodolphoeck.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4E6BB19F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4E6BB19F.000/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Subject: Re: returning to 8.2 from 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:51:13 -0000 On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 03:19:30PM -0300, Rodolpho Henrique Orlovsky Eckhardt wrote: > On 13:49 Sat 10 Sep , Fbsd8 wrote: > > After erasing the front of the HD nether 9.0 or 8.2 will install. > > Can I use livecd dd command to erase the second copy of the GPT? > > Where is it at? > > Try "gpart destroy -F ". You should be able to recreate a GPT or MBR scheme after that. > If gpart destroy doesn't work, perhaps gpart recover followed by gpart destroy may work. If gpart is unavailable, reading man gpart shows that the second copy is at the end of the disk. -- Michel TALON From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 19:10:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C6B106564A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E4D8FC1C for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:10:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=gqnCaCWzs5moHIgVns3PNnUGVC4rg+Qnkh/daSySs/o=; b=UFUCPXdFVQLmQAGv+CT1jO7NZDIvQh5jO9C4d/ik3rDQQD3eAZUjfTVPc644ZUpriAWty5dQ522FzfH1hprmKqvTcZwHLR4F4zGDQPvmlZpMgzcvuQ9ZZ6Ggl+OEADs3JHQE9DRbfzz5L2Cdakl71PIIuf10uKJhMmaoz1ybxUY= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:10:13 -0700 Message-ID: <4E6BB614.5000104@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:10:12 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodolpho Henrique Orlovsky Eckhardt References: <20110910164401.GA89611@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4E6BA322.8090901@a1poweruser.com> <20110910181930.GA2346@woden.rodolphoeck.com> In-Reply-To: <20110910181930.GA2346@woden.rodolphoeck.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2011 19:10:13.0840 (UTC) FILETIME=[44C20500:01CC6FED] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: Michel Talon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: returning to 8.2 from 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:10:13 -0000 Rodolpho Henrique Orlovsky Eckhardt wrote: > On 13:49 Sat 10 Sep , Fbsd8 wrote: >> After erasing the front of the HD nether 9.0 or 8.2 will install. >> Can I use livecd dd command to erase the second copy of the GPT? >> Where is it at? > > Try "gpart destroy -F ". You should be able to recreate a GPT or MBR scheme after that. > gpart destroy -F da0 gives this message gpart: geom 'da0': Invalid argument da0 has the HD in question connected through usb port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 19:10:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C53106566C for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com (mail-ew0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D229E8FC1D for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1627075ewy.17 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:10:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h2dOob2GKfM7EhoobAsZchFB0v0fKibaCg3a3SNRE2I=; b=uHBCu8p7XDOifFHOxHIQzY5QqH1qXBPL8r8oNv6+YpBD7ZyooXF5TJu4Ktf6GtjPdS s/NS0p0w7PWv8/p5ihrv9s1AO6ofF/mLvo08ngkiYNMhKQH6NMGQ4I0vmkIWalLei74W tXjkCbPzZU/QOe0YXl4FqktXmdqcu8unlBFWY= Received: by 10.14.9.142 with SMTP id 14mr296989eet.190.1315681836864; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (5ED0E470.cm-7-1d.dynamic.ziggo.nl [94.208.228.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f56sm297763eea.0.2011.09.10.12.10.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E6BB629.9010205@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:10:33 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 References: <4E6B8EB0.8070303@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6B8EB0.8070303@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: returning to 8.2 from 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:10:39 -0000 Fbsd8 schreef: > Have test pc. Been running 8.2 just fine. Installed 9.0 from cd and > after playing around tried to reinstall 8.2. Got error about GTP table > while trying to setup the HD. Used 8.0 livecd to > "dd if=/del/zero of=/dev/ad0 count=5 to wipe the start of the HD clean. > Now 8.2 install issues this msg > GEOM: ad0: the primary GPT table is corrupt or invalid. > > How do I fix the HD so 8.2 will install? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" maybe this little script helps you. http://wiki.freenas.org/faq:0129 It helped me in several situations. If that does not do the job, you could try dban disknuke that will wipe the disk completely regards, Johan Hendriks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 20:16:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0D7106566B for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01768FC08 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:16:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=I2r4rU7itJRpfOyK6VTJ2J5aKRQo/s3D3T3zptCr47U=; b=ihKFpi8w2lbtpv4078LHBn9GPySVJUrZ/isQPR/+DSwVDDQu6q3ddo7aHEcKvX2i9VR/2gqnMprvkL2NMubARiBOCK9bKoA+Pq62qEySQMJDRQCA0RvqGU/+UzkL5crceC3LPWYtouYoA7PzAnsS859RSvLspyqwqcCoAJimjVY= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:16:51 -0700 Message-ID: <4E6BC5B2.9020902@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:16:50 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johan Hendriks References: <4E6B8EB0.8070303@a1poweruser.com> <4E6BB629.9010205@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6BB629.9010205@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2011 20:16:51.0987 (UTC) FILETIME=[93D6D630:01CC6FF6] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: returning to 8.2 from 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:16:51 -0000 Johan Hendriks wrote: > Fbsd8 schreef: >> Have test pc. Been running 8.2 just fine. Installed 9.0 from cd and >> after playing around tried to reinstall 8.2. Got error about GTP table >> while trying to setup the HD. Used 8.0 livecd to >> "dd if=/del/zero of=/dev/ad0 count=5 to wipe the start of the HD clean. >> Now 8.2 install issues this msg >> GEOM: ad0: the primary GPT table is corrupt or invalid. >> >> How do I fix the HD so 8.2 will install? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > maybe this little script helps you. > http://wiki.freenas.org/faq:0129 > > It helped me in several situations. > > If that does not do the job, you could try dban disknuke that will wipe > the disk completely > > regards, > Johan Hendriks > > diskinfo da0 says Device not configured I all ready did "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 count=2 to wipe the front of the disk. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 20:30:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6310106566C for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:30:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodolpho.eckhardt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA3F8FC14 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf2 with SMTP id 2so2923454gyf.13 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:30:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key:user-agent; bh=LYsptqP8REtMy/SrrupZComzV5rMjTQQr8lnxX0i95s=; b=xa5Kg12sQa5FUlq2yfsaBiFaITVw5PvLYpGZ8RWWBPUyxzUIguNWonjxfEjtclNUWG y8hHWLY+fCwZXmWGphCJCHiBr2wwTOY4OIuHGV8Iwm9X9ITjZN0B2u+vDjNpo6hZLNac zN/P4gqrADMzldYQWo7RTKdbXXMOuhlC1sB30= Received: by 10.236.77.162 with SMTP id d22mr18961267yhe.24.1315686615848; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:30:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gondor.rodolphoeck.com ([187.38.166.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s42sm10204294yhs.0.2011.09.10.13.30.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gondor.rodolphoeck.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) rodolpho.eckhardt@gmail.com; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:30:13 -0300 (BRT) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:30:09 -0300 From: Rodolpho Henrique Orlovsky Eckhardt To: Fbsd8 Message-ID: <20110910203009.GB2346@woden.rodolphoeck.com> References: <20110910164401.GA89611@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4E6BA322.8090901@a1poweruser.com> <20110910181930.GA2346@woden.rodolphoeck.com> <4E6BB614.5000104@a1poweruser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E6BB614.5000104@a1poweruser.com> X-PGP-Key: https://keys.rodolphoeck.com.br/rodolpho.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Michel Talon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: returning to 8.2 from 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:30:17 -0000 --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15:10 Sat 10 Sep , Fbsd8 wrote: > gpart destroy -F da0 > gives this message > gpart: geom 'da0': Invalid argument > da0 has the HD in question connected through usb port. Try: gpart destroy -F /dev/da0 --=20 Rodolpho Eckhardt http://rodolphoeck.com --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOa8jRAAoJEKTP4AdsVjfnpAYP+weJ1PT9tKApoy8JmzLUAnH8 ZYzQSY0Bml0q/HiouNS5jtrWdCQKYv+i/pxkAQTeCErVo2oyvVSeZxy1qa/C38Tx zKrjXYxIQCFNgXhC+T7iSNN8MmkRnPLNO3K3jApXGMCAJrBbdwZkR01HZEOwnoPL 7FJ1DM7ZJnRfg8ATS27Vx+B1+J3pq93BfOFHX3CwF/nNJRjOptD9ezEN1XLWb4Ck UHfidow8LUDLo2ltS92zxzYveZ2KIuaH+F/Yiu2mAr6rNKFFHmgmjJZRrojLP7T1 v+2JmapodMTEIgGFho0oJZGwqj0or78Qnnu8UP6O2XpO7p/pR49H5JXyWvI4BCyr VajUzjhL5ysppQwGd+hWOR57SryREoijXq7Yr+2WKZDjc9dlfVx+CXSaEnDhj5JH qQRFsXO0+OiKgGyWufc/Ze4Vfdpw9a07ZXBo9Kz7v+3Q84MQPDzMDyRxOqVYPfRI WDFo0p1AU1fUow2ObFdliNhGR3NrA4fuiYVaIuS7FXRCctu1BkFzyCWrNRhEfIET WHzwMv8OO1Ho1qP32KMMI3FfDMwafWP6GKPe50Bxn87ZcikzcpkT55O4vqbsV53o u78u3Qbueuj9OO47ZsFFouNrGNhL9XiOiCRmX/uA9Ma92hyH/ICJR3JBlf8rXOHH XHtemQMO7YX+1AyJFQ0b =43++ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 20:42:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E16106564A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:42:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30708FC0A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eye4 with SMTP id 4so1839499eye.31 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:42:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bnj1oHiQ6YGrUqHoaMcMceS1pLzNoHETQdXZxXYtv9Y=; b=X+t3Tz/GBPjGxyB2rRP93mKpy+oXH4lSn7qPyhRq11H9nteMITPd1E7iWxW9ovPSm9 L18fvxgz4KPj7wMI3ZA/f5n0eruGdcp/tLckdQLi/AGj/v848KP+s2PdBy+R7YY/041Y 39Kj7DEsnC7rmpafqQ2ZwqMlLTK13wvqBYG+0= Received: by 10.213.21.194 with SMTP id k2mr1123359ebb.53.1315687363421; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:42:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (5ED0E470.cm-7-1d.dynamic.ziggo.nl [94.208.228.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v9sm10595213eej.5.2011.09.10.13.42.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E6BCBBF.7000802@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 22:42:39 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 References: <4E6B8EB0.8070303@a1poweruser.com> <4E6BB629.9010205@gmail.com> <4E6BC5B2.9020902@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6BC5B2.9020902@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: returning to 8.2 from 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:42:45 -0000 Fbsd8 schreef: > Johan Hendriks wrote: >> Fbsd8 schreef: >>> Have test pc. Been running 8.2 just fine. Installed 9.0 from cd and >>> after playing around tried to reinstall 8.2. Got error about GTP >>> table while trying to setup the HD. Used 8.0 livecd to >>> "dd if=/del/zero of=/dev/ad0 count=5 to wipe the start of the HD clean. >>> Now 8.2 install issues this msg >>> GEOM: ad0: the primary GPT table is corrupt or invalid. >>> >>> How do I fix the HD so 8.2 will install? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> maybe this little script helps you. >> http://wiki.freenas.org/faq:0129 >> >> It helped me in several situations. >> >> If that does not do the job, you could try dban disknuke that will >> wipe the disk completely >> >> regards, >> Johan Hendriks >> >> > > > diskinfo da0 > > says Device not configured > > I all ready did "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 count=2 to wipe the > front of the disk. i now see two different things? dd if=/del/zero of=/dev/ad0 count=5 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 count=2 first your disk is adx and the second time it is dax Make sure you use the right disk. There is also a part add the end of the disk that needs to be wiped, not only the start of the disk. regards, Johan Hendriks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 22:55:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D600E106564A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 22:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8108FC08 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 22:55:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=uwPGB2rt6zsi7cWlwR/JNBJoWCR2AdoWt23M6oADucw=; b=g7nSDz8FtZ5/yR5Fhpkg6WcrDCm7zcd9GJvL54eNmXNeSHnZ6Vr952LySpITGEjszvU9QmiTI18n69QRiKj2b0wEbIQsazpBC6OUW6ceHsxnwc/jzhhx7LwwxSJkA8qYJj/K+iLavGjH4JCEJWX80Is7PqmS/6//K/LUTrG0HxE= Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([76.240.47.196]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:55:32 -0700 Message-ID: <4E6BEAE3.10402@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:55:31 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johan Hendriks References: <4E6B8EB0.8070303@a1poweruser.com> <4E6BB629.9010205@gmail.com> <4E6BC5B2.9020902@a1poweruser.com> <4E6BCBBF.7000802@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6BCBBF.7000802@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2011 22:55:32.0846 (UTC) FILETIME=[BEB6A0E0:01CC700C] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: returning to 8.2 from 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 22:55:32 -0000 Johan Hendriks wrote: > Fbsd8 schreef: >> Johan Hendriks wrote: >>> Fbsd8 schreef: >>>> Have test pc. Been running 8.2 just fine. Installed 9.0 from cd and >>>> after playing around tried to reinstall 8.2. Got error about GTP >>>> table while trying to setup the HD. Used 8.0 livecd to >>>> "dd if=/del/zero of=/dev/ad0 count=5 to wipe the start of the HD clean. >>>> Now 8.2 install issues this msg >>>> GEOM: ad0: the primary GPT table is corrupt or invalid. >>>> >>>> How do I fix the HD so 8.2 will install? >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> maybe this little script helps you. >>> http://wiki.freenas.org/faq:0129 >>> >>> It helped me in several situations. >>> >>> If that does not do the job, you could try dban disknuke that will >>> wipe the disk completely >>> >>> regards, >>> Johan Hendriks >>> >>> >> >> >> diskinfo da0 >> >> says Device not configured >> >> I all ready did "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 count=2 to wipe the >> front of the disk. > i now see two different things? > dd if=/del/zero of=/dev/ad0 count=5 > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 count=2 > > first your disk is adx and the second time it is dax > > Make sure you use the right disk. > There is also a part add the end of the disk that needs to be wiped, not > only the start of the disk. > > regards, > Johan Hendriks > > > Thanks that little script at http://wiki.freenas.org/faq:0129 did the trick.