From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 13 12:06:01 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E9EBCF
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 12:06:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from quix.smartspb.net (quix.smartspb.net [217.119.16.133])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E212F10
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 12:05:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dyr.smartspb.net ([217.119.16.26] helo=[127.0.0.1])
 by quix.smartspb.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
 (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <dyr@smartspb.net>)
 id 1WkBW1-000F6D-HD
 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 May 2014 16:09:01 +0400
Message-ID: <53720AA4.80909@smartspb.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 16:05:56 +0400
From: Dennis Yusupoff <dyr@smartspb.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with ipfw table add 0.0.0.0/8
References: <5371084F.1060009@bsdinfo.com.br>
 <F78BF3AC-F031-4528-A4C1-5B22E88CEC00@dataix.net>
 <5371112B.2030209@bsdinfo.com.br> <5371E9E7.70400@smartspb.net>
 <5371F4C8.3080501@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <5371F4C8.3080501@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140512-4, 12.05.2014), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 12:06:01 -0000

I think that universal table for all kind of data (ipv4, ipv6, ports,
etc) is a bad idea by design. At least unless you haven't any ability to
specify address family on add, to avoid attempts to guess what user
meant. Something like "ipfw table X add DEEF.DE ipv6".


13.05.2014 14:32, Alexander V. Chernikov пишет:
> On 13.05.2014 13:46, Dennis Yusupoff wrote:
>> May be this will help? See answer on
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/189471
> I'll try to fix it within a few days.
>
> The problem itself happens due to the fact that every CIDR table
> address is packed into IPv6 address and IPv4 ones are encoded as
> deprecated IPv6-compatible ones.
> this leads to the problems with decoding things like 0/X or ::1

-- 
Best regards,
Dennis Yusupoff,
network engineer of
Smart-Telecom ISP
Russia, Saint-Petersburg