From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 25 13:13:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3CF37B81E; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:13:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA15001; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Richard Wackerbarth Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Archive pruning In-Reply-To: <00042515105300.02802@nomad.dataplex.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > Actually, I didn't start this. Someone else brought up the idea. ...and quickly decided it was not worthwhile. > The quiet majority that might benefit are not very likely to speak up when > they are told some is impossible. After all, they are at the mercy of the > very developers who oppose change because it does not directly benefit > the developers. > > I do object to the characterization by these developers that it CANNOT be > done. I haven't heard anyone say that. What I have heard is "too much work for too little gain". If you still disagree, it's time to put up or shut up :-) Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message