From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Nov 25 11:24: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6192D37B401 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:24:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from totem.fix.no (totem.fix.no [80.91.32.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D829A43E88 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:24:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anders@totem.fix.no) Received: by totem.fix.no (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C670320297; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:24:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:24:33 +0100 From: Anders Nordby To: Dan Langille Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreshPorts sanity testing - should errors be sent to committers? Message-ID: <20021125192433.GB55119@totem.fix.no> Mail-Followup-To: Anders Nordby , Dan Langille , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20021124112140.J39895-100000@12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com> <3DE22FC8.10368.D3893A69@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DE22FC8.10368.D3893A69@localhost> X-PGP-Key: http://anders.fix.no/pgp/ X-PGP-Key-FingerPrint: 1E0F C53C D8DF 6A8F EAAD 19C5 D12A BC9F 0083 5956 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:12:24PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: >>> I wish to raise the issue of making this feature non-opt-in. >> >> Not only no, but hell no. > A feature is available which improves quality, catches simple syntax > errors immediately, and has zero affect on those who do their work > error-free.. Why do you object to that? Ports committers and other committers should be free to choose their error checking methods on their own. At least make it opt-out. Cheers, -- Anders. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message