Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:40:35 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, jb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE in freebsd6 Message-ID: <20081216134035.GU2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <a31046fc0812160423g7508bdbdrb160e9d1ec12b6e3@mail.gmail.com> References: <a31046fc0812160423g7508bdbdrb160e9d1ec12b6e3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--fPlFr9CTKi+yOJ4Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote: > Hi. >=20 > Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged into RELENG_6 without > merging a possible underlining infrastructure and breaking something else? > I want to use it in my custom freebsd6 because I see "interspersed strings > written from different CPUs at the same time": >=20 > uuusseseerrvmrem: vlmivmeimtme :e mx:ceed eldi bly 2i89m68m (iihttt t > pde) eaxtx cfcorke1 22e3e > deded ebyd by28 296898 68(h t(tpdh) att ftorkp1 22d3 > ) at fork1 223 >=20 > I'm talking about only merging kern/subr_prf.c 1.126, 1.128, 1.129. >=20 > Thanks. I did a backport of the option some time ago, see http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/releng_6_printf_bufr.3.patch --fPlFr9CTKi+yOJ4Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklHr9MACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4j61ACaAqserSkkAP0nDbXIFJJkdYeq TMYAoJ/bMtEaaJvdjffOyjdqtXjSbscR =POtG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fPlFr9CTKi+yOJ4Y--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081216134035.GU2038>