Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:04:26 +0100 From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> To: Petri Helenius <petri@helenius.fi> Cc: developer@open-zfs.org, "<freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: l2arc compression leak Message-ID: <CALfReyd9oKh-v307Zu_ogAtQ-y200uf__x=cmfL5iHM0cGwE=Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5AD0B5C0-7C72-46FA-86D3-7AFA8FA1E84E@helenius.fi> References: <5AD0B5C0-7C72-46FA-86D3-7AFA8FA1E84E@helenius.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
thats really a decision for you as your situation is specific to you, and you get hit with the penalties if anything goes wrong. If its causing you a major problem in production and the risk/benfit ratio is worth it you could use it, but I would make sure you do rigorous testing first. However if you dont have a specific issue, i would hold off until its in stable at least. On 16 June 2014 07:40, Petri Helenius <petri@helenius.fi> wrote: > > Hi, > > Recent FreeBSD 10-STABLE seems to be suffering from the L2ARC memory leak, > eventually hanging on pfault. > > Should I apply this patch > http://lists.open-zfs.org/pipermail/developer/2014-March/000535.html > > or wait for integration to SVN? > > Pete > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALfReyd9oKh-v307Zu_ogAtQ-y200uf__x=cmfL5iHM0cGwE=Q>