From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Nov 17 14: 6:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EF637B401 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:06:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2A643E4A for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:06:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918918A16E7; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 18:06:41 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 18:06:41 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Chat Subject: Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS? In-Reply-To: <058a01c28e7c$c1af5f60$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Message-ID: <20021117180438.F23359-100000@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Marc writes: > > > Actually ... there is a difference between a > > developer stress-testing an application, especially > > one as complex as an OS, and real world testing > > ... > > That's why software companies usually have dedicated test groups. Maybe we should for one for FreeBSD ... a closed list where the only traffic on it is crash related to the -STABLE branch ... all OS committers required to be on the list, and those willing to test/thrash the latest and greatest -STABLE ... I'd put all my servers back to -STABLE in a minute if I thought someone cared when it crashed ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message