Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Feb 2018 19:54:10 -0800
From:      Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,  svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r329126 - head/etc/devd
Message-ID:  <CAG6CVpWTiWVgqi_odaq=5BjdDJ7WRda6-1BUyZkRHiFx9XkdaQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrqevYVtb3A%2Bnc1HArk15_Uh0kYnRFffbH3UdjMfX8QTg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1518374549.32585.238.camel@freebsd.org> <201802112346.w1BNkPXc041510@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <CAG6CVpX9TbEwr_2ZD-qK7Lifn5JutQjrKopRRBT%2B_xR6cZdSCw@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfrqevYVtb3A%2Bnc1HArk15_Uh0kYnRFffbH3UdjMfX8QTg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> No, it's another reason why generated devd files are wrong in the face of
> devmatch.

Devmatch is both vaporware and orthogonal to the placement of
pre-devmatch static system databases.

I'm on board with the glorious devmatch-autoloads-usb-devices future.
But someone has to actually write the logic that incorporates it with
devd and remove these databases before it matters.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG6CVpWTiWVgqi_odaq=5BjdDJ7WRda6-1BUyZkRHiFx9XkdaQ>