Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:09:50 +0100 From: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: -doc/bugs issue/question Message-ID: <20030811170949.GB368@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20030811125419.266958a0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030811125419.266958a0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 12:54:19PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> Greetings,
>=20
> This is a simple question/issue I've been thinking of:
>=20
> Many people submit patches in their PRs; however, many of them are
> not applied because they are submitted for a stable branch and
> many developers simply lack the time to merge it into current.
>=20
> Perhaps in our PR/bugs documentation, we could recommend that:
>=20
> A patch against the CURRENT or HEAD CVS branch is preffered since
> all new code should be applied and tested first. After
> appropriate or substational testing has been done, the code will
> be merged/migrated to the STABLE branch.
Good idea. I'd recommend the "Attaching patches or files" section of the
problem-reports article, where it should slot in quite nicely; but do
spellcheck the above first ;-)
Ceri
--=20
User: DO YOU ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST AS YOUR PERSONAL LORD AND SAVIOR?
Iniaes: Sure, I can accept all forms of payment.
-- www.chatterboxchallenge.com
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/N83docfcwTS3JF8RAgflAKCfq16wm6pa3u44MVM+OXkvPmcmTwCfd7TR
92b7wWJ2Le1b2c1+jzXQpLA=
=uXfm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030811170949.GB368>