Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Jan 1998 20:08:32 -0500 (EST)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: LFS is nuked?
Message-ID:  <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199801310004.RAA13451@usr05.primenet.com>
References:  <19980130234945.43035@klemm.gtn.com> <199801310004.RAA13451@usr05.primenet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 00:04:04 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> said:

> Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's
> bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and
> X.25 code have all been fixed...

But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to
real users.

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801310108.UAA23804>