Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 18:52:49 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, Matt Jacob <mjacob@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/isp isp.c Message-ID: <199910281752.SAA00345@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> of "Wed, 27 Oct 1999 20:05:55 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9910272005270.30965-100000@semuta.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm? Not following you on this one here...
> > >
> > > Look- I agree that things should not just immediately get punted from
> > > -current into -stable- but this was an obvious problem to fix. If I don't
> > > do an immediate MFC on the obvious ones, things get out of sync very
> > > rapidly, and it becomes impossible to maintain the 3 different FreeBSD
> > > release streams, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux streams, and this is just the
> > > OSS platforms I'm working on....
> > >
> > > If there's another way to do this that guarantees a coherent bug fix
> > > across all the streams, I'd be glad to head abou it.
> >
> > Okay, I thought I had just seen a commit that enabled and then later a
> > commit that disabled the same thing.
>
> Still would like to know if there is an easier way to do this.... :-)
> Due diligence is wearing me out...
``cvs diff -u | review | patch'' ?
--
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@FreeBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>; <brian@OpenBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! <brian@FreeBSD.org.uk>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910281752.SAA00345>