Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 17:31:42 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Ts'o" <dan@dna.rockefeller.edu> To: benedict@echonyc.com (Snob Art Genre) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel Etherexpress PRO/100+ PCI Message-ID: <199805072131.RAA16674@dna.rockefeller.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980507150513.18096B-100000@echonyc.com> from "Snob Art Genre" at May 7, 98 03:11:01 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As I understand it, the PRO/100+ is just a PRO/100B, but fabricated > differently -- they figured out how to do it with one less chip. But > the interface is the same. An Intel support engineer told me that, although very similar, the Pro/100+ and Pro/100B are not identical at the software/driver level and that minor changes would probably be necessary to fully support the Pro/100+. He said that (at the time), since the Pro/100B was still on the market that if I was concerned, I should get the Pro/100B instead to avoid problems. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805072131.RAA16674>