Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 23:10:52 -0800 From: Jos Backus <josb@cncdsl.com> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Message-ID: <20001216231052.D80635@lizzy.bugworks.com> In-Reply-To: <20001216162720.A11561@dan.emsphone.com>; from dnelson@emsphone.com on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:26:58PM -0600 References: <Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de> <200012142245.RAA69128@cs.rpi.edu> <20001216164405.C9380@oberon.physik.fu-berlin.de> <20001216162720.A11561@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:26:58PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> That's why dotlocking is recommended for locking mail spools. Both
> procmail and mutt will dotlock your mail file while it's being
> accessed.
Or Maildirs.
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Modularity is not a hack."
_/ _/ _/ -- D. J. Bernstein
_/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/
josb@cncdsl.com _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001216231052.D80635>