From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 13 00:08:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8714116A494 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4268513C442 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H5WRA-0007un-Id for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:07:56 +0100 Received: from 89-172-39-90.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.39.90]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:07:56 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-39-90.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:07:56 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:07:22 +0100 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <465799.40884.qm@web30312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6B28B479E0BA7031338ECFC6" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-39-90.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 Sender: news Subject: Re: network perf : em driver ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:08:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6B28B479E0BA7031338ECFC6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chuck Swiger wrote: > Quick testing suggests that an Apache child process accumulates a > similar amount of CPU time transferring large files as scp when using a= n > SSL connection;=20 As expected. Though the original poster didn't mention using SSL, as far as I can see. --------------enig6B28B479E0BA7031338ECFC6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFqCLGldnAQVacBcgRAkb4AKCB4ISUHyNanY5FftV9JQBk6o/WVQCgq9r9 zHhnx2Fz4EuCTktryv+KBPI= =CJAQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6B28B479E0BA7031338ECFC6--