From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 04:54:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3C516A47A for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 04:54:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7373F43D45 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 04:54:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 59816 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2006 04:54:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=b3ch2HSri614xWNwEmHzPEKe7FBNNH9YaatrjkasaqvYUtT7S4rgQqinF0BymOao4qj7XYp5SBd0ywoFStqw0MV9+IBNgCZsteBPSKGupLHon65ghQJONnZR2BugY+Ti8dQk3YHusdrSuvjkLfKzhU4cqW89xkQzwrvc2NEzExQ= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218 with plain) by smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 2006 04:54:23 -0000 Message-ID: <4498D108.90907@rogers.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:54:32 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Hibbits References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ~/.hosts patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 04:54:25 -0000 Justin Hibbits wrote: > Hey folks, got an interesting patch. This adds a ~/.hosts file > (personal version of /etc/hosts). It was written against 6-STABLE > about a week before 6.1 was released, and has been sitting collecting > dust for the last month and a half. Currently it augments /etc/hosts > instead of replacing it or prepending it. Any comments? One > suggestion that was made was to make it an nss module so that it could > be controlled by the admin. It probably could use some cleanup as > well, just putting it out here for proof of concept for now, and some > direction. Just what exactly is the point of having a user specified hosts file? Seems like a bad idea to me, in terms of security.