From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 11 02:16:47 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DDA3B82
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 02:16:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pb0-x229.google.com (mail-pb0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::229])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9CF8F56
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 02:16:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id jt11so8146363pbb.28
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=GoC/1z7kvkubnGJ5HkvoP/sH7aEWfkwWHqkGmST2K6g=;
 b=oZhn97KHYZAPaxJqOTbdGs8/K0gGhZE0E86l4O/WhNhF5RGOzQLRbE3vSRwKtfGLZR
 HFrQjcutlfm2rzg4+9cw/QHAuh0aRB/c8EjBPQs27UEXg0vxWARqjoGGg+cqkwLENMP2
 /kZBpMt5n3tauonTxMhDHGRMhDmNojQ9LqaC6f/rDlS3NKqUW17PtDjCYoII8i5dbVvt
 GSVzBr74f3QAgTVfs/VRmncVQbbXErBwu27l5CZxn1huz8YXILVStOzraTkWwgQiVsu8
 gqLY2Ypix5TVLRxfHWAG+9Gu8eiOqiq8+ODGdflKfwHbYwQ+Sg9VH54RH+pXIM4gcGaC
 B/ow==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.112.164 with SMTP id ir4mr7984578pbb.153.1394504206540;
 Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.55.7 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <531DF82F.3010607@netlabs.org>
References: <531DF0DD.8070809@netlabs.org>
 <CA+tpaK1q8KRVB5HTMiu_Szy0XnbLMKzXKa4PC=USj05C4WFE7A@mail.gmail.com>
 <531DF82F.3010607@netlabs.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:16:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+tpaK2dZeyyCRNLK2p=Kp9XQ0WKxQMBg27tykj7BO2hJ53aFg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Reoccuring ZFS performance problems
From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Gschwend <ml-ktk@netlabs.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 02:16:47 -0000

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Gschwend <ml-ktk@netlabs.org>wrote:

> On 10.03.14 18:27, Adam Vande More wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> > Are you using a ZFS backed swap device?
>
> does not look like:
>
>        34  419430333  vtbd0  GPT  (200G)
>         34        128      1  freebsd-boot  (64k)
>        162    8388608      2  freebsd-swap  (4.0G)
>    8388770  411041597      3  freebsd-zfs  (196G)


The question remains unanswered.  swapinfo(8) will show the the swap device
in use, and you can use that information to determine if it is ZFS backed.
 There was a swap device listed in your earlier post, but not enough info
to determine what if it's the underlying block device.

-- 
Adam