From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 18 22:44:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net (swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B87937B409 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 22:44:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us) Received: from sm.socccd.cc.ca.us (pool0708.cvx4-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [209.178.148.198]) by swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA29763; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 22:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B567452.36965E56@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 22:46:58 -0700 From: Farooq Mela X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Quick question about x86 asm References: <3B554445.193CE946@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> <3B55BD97.A6E40F1E@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry Lambert wrote: > > cc -S is your friend. Right, well that can certainly help, but what gcc generates can be dependant on calling convention, optimization setting, &c &c, and though the code generated in one particular scenario may not be an absolute indicator of it's behavior. In other words, I was looking for more of a "yes" or "no" type response ;-). Anyway, redirecting this question to a gcc list. -- farooq To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message