Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 10:48:41 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamassassin vs Perl Message-ID: <20110625084841.GH16648@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20110624070900.GF16648@home.opsec.eu> References: <4E034711.6030007@webrz.net> <4E03470D.7040909@yandex.ru> <20110623162920.GE16648@home.opsec.eu> <20110624092457.7d82744e@gmail.com> <20110624070900.GF16648@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > > > Did you run perl-after-upgrade command after update? [yes...] > I assume that short of a full rebuild nothing helps if the perl > version increases. This is a bit painful 8-( > > How can one reconstruct a good dependency tree of all perl related ports > which allows to cleanly rebuild them all ? > > portupgrade -fr perl seems to have issues, as well. > > I'll start one and report back. After an portupgrade -fr perl run, I still have approx. 4200 files in /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0. This is a huge amount of files, much larger than I expected. What went wrong ? I can provide a copy of the portupgrade -fr perl run. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 9 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110625084841.GH16648>